| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Comments:
<0> you don't think 70% of the people don't want more troops in IRAQ to help the 'fight'. <0> Iraq needs a civial war not the USA fighting for them. <1> just wait till they report the results and they put their spin on em. <1> polls are all rigged. <1> the more words in the options, the more rigged they are. <2> US needs a civil war! <1> for instance <2> RED VS> BLUE
<0> interesting theroy youhave here <1> why does the 'no' answer say "define 'win'" <1> where in the poll topic does it say anything about win <0> true true <0> i see your point kitchen <0> god damn MSNBC! <3> evidence: you can try here for 2.6 -> http://dev.gentoo.org/~dsd/genpatches/tarballs/ and here for 2.4 -> http://dev.gentoo.org/~plasmaroo/patches/kernel/gentoo-sources/ <0> LETS BOMB EM ! <0> This BB has everything! <1> bitrot: don't forget the world code '666' <1> NAME THAT MOVIE REFERNCE <0> kitchen: oh i got it lOl <0> ESCAPING FORM LA <0> I WIN <1> BITROT WINS <0> such a horrid movie <1> nah, i liked it <0> I never saw Escape from NY <0> it's escape from LA <0> not escaping from la <1> escape from ny is good too <0> my bad <1> escape from la was pure cheese <1> which is what makes it great. <0> indeed <4> shiznix: ty much <5> heh <1> hanggliding off the santa ana winds from the queen mary? haw! <0> okay <0> wtf
<5> my cl***mates flamed the blackberry phones <0> if i'm granted access to a dir on the network drive <0> er on ao network drive in windows <1> riding a ****ing tsunami and jumping into a car that just happens to be right next to the wave? <0> would i have to log out and then back in to have the permissions 'refreshed'? <1> no. <1> the permissions are live <0> I didn't think so <5> /etc/init.d/bitrot stop <0> that's why i hate the people who work here <4> unless its domain oriented <0> evidence: it is domain <4> then yes you do <0> but i've never had to do this before <0> interesting <0> okay brb <6> ok, i'm going home <4> or you can run gpupdate <4> but it might not work in all cases <0> well <0> that didn't do a god damn thing <0> back to what i was saying <0> that's why i hate ppl in thius company <0> ****ing a <4> so does gentoo only patch against the initial release of a kernel? 2.16.17 but not 2.6.17.1? <7> e%ewe rock all -r's <7> once it goes stable we're on to the next breaky code <7> this ain't no fedora channel <8> evidence: pretty much <0> ah nm it did work <0> :) <9> VVV <10> Silly KuR-RupT <9> llol <3> evidence: no, take genpatches-2.6.17-7.base.tar.bz2 for example, that would be a set of patches for linux-2.6.17.7
Return to
#gentoo or Go to some related
logs:
#computers #beginner #mirc #debian #online apache mod_rewrite to iis change port #visualbasic reload windows hosts file without rebooting AustNet RogerY #dsl
|
|