| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Comments:
<0> it wouldn't run
<0> segfaulted constantly.
<1> hmm didnt try it just took a look
<0> yeah, it's a hardcore program
<1> then 4 opterons might be nice
<1> but thats not 300$
<1> :(
<0> 4 opterons is also gonna cost me $800
<1> i guess a bit mroe :)
<0> i found 4 840's for $150.
<2> mmm a few opterons would be nice
<0> opterons are dirt cheap now
<1> dualcore opterons?
<1> lol
<0> can get 140s for like $30
<1> they wont drop
<0> i don't know if they have smp capable dual core opterons yet.
<0> well.. 8 way capable
<1> i have dual core opterons at work
<0> what model?
<0> you need the 8 way capable cpu to do a quad setup.
<1> dunno, can check tomorow
<1> only 2 proz
<1> 4 normal opterons in the sun v40z
<1> 2 procs in the dualcore box i mean
<0> all i see are opteron 2xx series dual core cpus
<0> you can only do dual setups with those
<0> need an 8xx series to do quad.
<1> quad normal opteron, dual dualcore
<1> i am not expressing myself well :) never mind
<0> whtvr... you're the one who changed this around to be dual core.. not me.
<1> heh :)
<1> cant argue that
<0> heh
<0> the ****ty part about opterons is paying $300 for a decent board.
<1> :)
<1> you wanna know the sun price?
<1> you will need a few more 0
<0> no
<1> :)
<0> sun is the devil
<1> yes
<0> i used to have lots of sun hardware running
<0> but it's all crap
<1> aggreed, a lame sunfire 4900 costs around 900.000$
<0> and it died.
<1> but nice hardware
<0> hah!
<1> indeed
<0> that's insane!
<1> nope
<1> thats just mid entry cl***
<0> my quad xeon was $60,000 in 1999
<0> 1998 maybe
<1> :)
<0> i got it for $500 on ebay
<0> in 2003
<0> 8||
<1> yap
<1> but i never really liked the xeons
<1> dunno why
<1> dont ask :)
<0> i'm not an intel guy
<1> whats an "intel" guy
<1> :)
<0> a guy who likes intel
<1> i like what is nice
<1> and currently i liked the e6600 intel dualcore :)
<0> i have a laptop with a 939 athlon 64 in it, and i'm extremely happy with that.
<1> i wanna have 4 cpus in top like at that stupid sunfire :)
<1> <-- pentium-m
<1> thinkpad t41
<0> 8/
<1> i wanna have fiber optic discs too
<1> fc discc i mean
<1> argl
<1> ...
<0> fiber channel
<1> yes
<1> so it cannot be recorded from distance
<1> enhanced security :)
<0> i guess i can't run linux on this box i'm building anyway.
<0> need something i can do UPS, and my other shipping stuff on.
<3> because you're a noob?
<0> lude, yes; that's 100% why.
<4> ODBC = ****ing gay
<4> who the **** would want to run their entire application, including db server, and be restricted to one machine
<0> lude, when i boot.. i keep getting LI.. then it stops. pls to fix
<5> how does ODBC restrict you to one machine
<4> well
<4> unless you know of a way to make an odbc data source available over a network
<4> and if you do, please, let me know
<5> it's all depends on the driver
<4> i'm not about to ****ing run apache and php and try to do devel on my windows box
<4> err.. isn't odbc suppsoed to be an abstraction layer?
<4> can't i just say "connect to machine blah and use DSN blah"
<5> yeah, with a driver for each database
<4> ok
<5> i've connected to remote MySQL databases before from Windows
<4> so how do i connect from one box to another box via odbc?
<5> through the MyODBC driver
<4> well mysql has built-in networking
<5> on Windows, you create a DSN for your database with the right parameters
<5> server, port number etc
<5> anything the driver allows you to set
<4> bleh
<4> i don't understand the point of odbc then
<5> as long as you have an ODBC driver for it, you can access any database with the same code
<5> that's the point
<4> see, i thought odbc was an abstraction layer
<4> you need a driver for the db server to connec to odbc
<4> then you need a client driver
<4> why have the odbc middle man
<5> for not having to write different code for every existing database?
<4> but you do have to
<4> you have to have the client driver
<4> since there isn't a client driver for this DB platform for linux, I can't write software for it on linux
<4> which.. i swhat I thought ODBC took care of
<4> so that i have a generic ODBC driver on the client end
<4> have it connect to odbc on whatever machine i need
<6> old dirty bastard c
<4> bam.
<5> the only thing that should ever change in your code is the name of the DSN to connect to
<4> ok
<4> so why can't I just say
<4> "hey, connect to this DSN on blah"
<5> create a DSN that connects to blah
<5> this is done outside your program
<5> and done only once
<5> maybe you can even do it without that
<5> with a special URL
<4> still sounds like a ****ing waste of time
<4> why not just say "connect to mysql at blah"
<4> eh, I guess I can see a minor advantage
<4> you don't have to worry about if your language has support for X db server
<4> you just have to worry if they have odbc
<5> in JDBC you can connect to a driver p***ing parameters in the form of an UR
<4> so.. I can't make a DSN that connects to DSN@otherbox?
<5> if the driver supports it
<4> well
<4> the driver would be a ****ing odbc connector
<4> like a proxy
<4> that's what i'm saying
<4> is there anything like that
<4> cuz apparently the db server used for this project doesn't have network support
<5> what db server
<4> pervasive sql
<5> with MyODBC you setup a DSN "MyDSN" in the control panel with the server and port number as parameters
<5> all you do from your program is connect to "MyDSN"
<4> ok
<4> but i need to do the opposite of that, or set up a dsn that connects to another dsn on another machine
Return to
#gentoo
or
Go to some related
logs:
age fault in nonpage area
#delphi
#red
#politics
#computers
#hardware
#stocks
inetel pentium D vs core duo
#politics
#heroin
|
|