| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Comments:
<0> RIGHT
<0> you'd think it'd work like they say. it doesn't
<1> bitrot: hey jew there?
<2> MrStabby: what?
<2> lol
<2> keep nick works great
<2> everytime i loose it somehow like if i timeout
<2> the second the clone leaves
<2> i get mine back
<0> oh
<0> right
<3> KuR-RupT: ... nothing new
<2> MrEcho: ?
<2> VVV
<0> let us see if it works
<0> :)
<1> bitrot: i NEEd this! http://thepiratebay.org/tor/3500130/Garmin_US_TOPO_24K_National_Parks_v3_-_No_Unlock_Needed
<2> just type /keepnick and it will save it
<2> iamben: you cant DL it?
<2> 7 seeders?
<2> lo
<2> l
<0> you mean /keepnick -net efnet <nick>
<2> MrStabby: well ya u can do that too, but i just go to a channel located on efnet and type /keepnick
<2> and it autodetects
<0> yeah I tried but it says **** you
<0> Keepnick: Unable to find a chatnet
<2> 23:43 -!- Keepnick: Now keeping KuR-RupT on [efnet]
<4> what is a good iptables script to help set limits of connections and packets?
<2> FoxHunter: home made?
<2> dont think there is a script made for that
<4> ya ok. tutorial?
<4> I have something like: iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --syn --dport 22 -m connlimit --connlimit-above 2 -j REJECT
<5> iamben: download it! :)
<3> bitrot: he cant...
<5> I know
<5> wow
<5> newegg said they didn't get my package
<5> but UPS says it was delivered on the 4th
<0> you need to chown them
<5> doing that now
<3> did you give them the ups #
<5> going to try the webchat first
<5> no
<5> but i will this time ;)
<5> i didn't have the tracking# when I spoke to them
<3> and if you didnt put the RMA # on the outside... they dont like that
<5> which i did
<5> cus i can read directions
<3> good :)
<5> the only thing I didn't have is the RMA #
<5> which I got from the guy last time I spoke to him
<6> sadewa
<7> pamevxf
<8> febexxro
<4> how come this iptables rule isn't working?
<4> iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --syn --dport 0:65535 -m connlimit --connlimit-above 16 --connlimit-mask 24 -j REJECT
<4> it seems fine to me but it says, "iptables: No chain/target/match by that name"
<5> there isn't a destination...
<5> -d eth0
<5> er -i even
<5> input
<5> -i eth0
<4> oh
<4> uhm..adding -i eth0 didn't work
<9> `man iptables'
<9> its in the first 3-4 pages
<9> foxhunter: whats the point of that --dport
<9> i didnt know
<9> port 0 existed
<4> to specify all ports
<9> remove it ...
<4> ok
<9> not putting it isnt gonna match none ...
<4> then does it apply to everything if it's removed?
<9> if its tcp and syn
<9> it WILL match
<4> ok
<9> it cant not match what you didnt tell it to
<9> foxhunter: it doesnt "match" cause you didnt specify it, but its not NOT matching at the same time, it doesnt effect your rule at all
<5> I use tcp w/ dport all the time..
<9> bitrot: but his --dport option does /nothing/ to his rule
<5> motional: ahhh :)
<4> so instead of doing "iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 0:65535 -j DROP" I can remove the --dport there also
<9> bitrot: i find putting worthless matches in a rule just more confusing later
<5> guess it would make sense since it would just limit those connections on THAT interface
<4> ya, I would only use --dport if I wanted to limit connections on port 80
<9> iptables -A INPUT -j DROP -i eth0 -p tcp -m connlimit --connlimit-above 16 --connlimit-mask 24
<4> or whatever.
<9> and make sure you have connlimit support in kernel
<9> iptables -m connlimit -h
<4> ya, but I still missing something in that cmd
<4> it not working
<9> whats it say
<9> do that cmd
<4> iptables: No chain/target/match by that name
<9> you dont have connlimit
<5> motional: oh no i agree
<5> i just didn't think about it :)
<4> yup, connlimit is compiled in
<9> bitrot: ;)
<9> foxhunter: iptables -m connlimit -h
<4> yup
<4> it showed up
<4> if I type something rather than connlimit then I don't get the help screen
<9> foxhunter: no uh
<9> connlimit is in patch-o-matic
<4> connlimit v1.3.7 options:
<5> well
<9> its not in your kernel
<4> oh
<5> they still didn't process my RMA
<5> dude sent them an email
<4> so I need to compile it as a module
<4> or in the kernel
<9> foxhunter: no its not in kernel sources at all
<9> you need to go
<4> oh
<9> gentoo-wiki 'patch-o-matic'
<5> I haven't even setup the patch-o-matic
<4> I see
<5> still using whatever is available in the kernel @.@
<9> bitrot: heh i have it running on my laptop.. not the "easiest" implementation for gentoo
<9> they should find a better way
<5> yeah
<5> cus gentoo can't get **** right it seems
<9> heh
<5> probably going to install *gasp* fedora core
<9> i <3 gentoo just crap like patch-o-matic
<9> plus its confusing as ****
<5> motional: i like gentoo too
<5> I don't like portage anymore tho
<9> cause some of the **** IS in iptables sources
<5> and i'm tired of compiling everything.
<9> but NOT in kernel
<9> but some stuff is NOT in either
<9> so either way
<10> anyone using firefox 2.0 notice dramatic loss of launch speeds ?
<5> yea makes no sense
<5> jasmine: recompile it ;)
<10> over firefox 1.5.x
<9> you have to use patch-o-matic to get it into kernel sources
<5> motional: i see
<9> bitrot: so iptables -m ... -h becomes useless
<10> bitrot: is that a joke ?
<5> jasmine: no the simile means i'm dead serious.
<5> yes it's a joke
<5> jesus
<10> lol
<9> ok... i am not asking this
Return to
#gentoo
or
Go to some related
logs:
#solaris
xls to cvs
#microsoft
#beginner
#winxp
#microsoft
#linux-noob
nietzsche avatism
#windows
#ubuntu
|
|