| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Comments:
<0> any idea?
<1> 3 minutes
<0> i put in the live cd and am urnning it now
<1> 3 to 4 minutes
<2> MrStabby, bad blocks?
<0> and when i mount /dev/sda4 /mnt/sda4 it brings everything up just peachy
<0> only thing I did was pop in this raid card
<2> try different slot
<0> but the sda is not on that raid card as it is
<2> unshared preferable
<0> the slot is pci-e
<2> ah
<2> :)=
<0> either way, the sda is not on that card
<0> brb i'll try pulling the card out and see if it boots
<3> nastjuid: where is ya.. you owe me bling
<2> Ubench MEM: 291923
<4> User: Frantch Pasted http://pasteme.com/p.php?id=473
<2> no more output, just MEM
<5> renihs
<4> User: Frantch Pasted http://pasteme.com/p.php?id=474
<5> did it give you a ubench figure yet
<5> it does mem after the cpu
<5> wuts the cpu figure though :)
<2> it stopped, only output is the error i posted
<2> no cpu
<5> doh :(
<4> User: Frantch Pasted http://pasteme.com/p.php?id=475
<2> hmm dunno
<5> heh renihs got another bit of benchmark software?
<2> everything that is in portage :9
<2> app-benchmarks :)
<5> heh cant find anything that runs on both fbsd and linux
<5> renihs check this
<5> [root@netflow /var/run]# cat dmesg.boot |grep CPU |grep Detec
<5> FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 8 CPUs
<5> [root@netflow /var/run]# top -b |grep Mem
<5> Mem: 4243M Active, 2523M Inact, 169M Wired, 375M Cache, 214M Buf, 477M Free
<5> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.66GHz (2665.35-MHz K8-cl*** CPU)
<5> Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf48 Stepping = 8
<5> :)
<5> <3 that machine
<2> small
<2> but cute :)
<5> heh renihs *shrug* 8 woodcrest cpus
<5> ooops 4 woodcrest
<5> isnt bad
<2> AMD OpteronAMD Opteron(tm) Processor 848
<2> 4 :)
<5> renihs you sure those opterons will outrun these new intels?
<2> however, more benchmarking later, gotta go play a bit
<2> in 64bit, i guess so
<2> dunno
<5> renihs these intels ARE 64
<2> ya but intel sux at 63
<2> 4
<5> EM64T :)
<6> 65 ftw
<2> kk, bbl
<2> :)
<7> is it really worth it to go with x64 based gentoo over 32 bit?
<7> err x86_64 that is
<8> i barely notice a difference...but why not?
<7> better hardware support with i686 for one...
<9> nux: lots of reasons
<9> nux: flash, all sorts of 32bit binary plugins
<9> nux: say, did I permanently lose my voice?
<8> hmm i spose
<8> Genia4: did you change your host?
<7> I have a EM64T pentium D and im kinda thinking about gentoo 64
<10> I'd say that in general, 64-bit works great for servers, virtually no problems. But 32-bit is still the better option for desktops.
<11> i'd agree with CannedBar
<11> after having run both archs for server and desktop
<7> ahh that what I figured
<9> nux: yea
<9> nux: but it's permanent now
<11> "tar -clpf - --numeric-owner / | tar -xf - -p" is the same as "rsync -ax / .", right?
<11> er, "rsync -av --numeric-ids / ."
<11> hmm, its not copying sockets
<0> christ
<0> some reason the pci-e card was being called sda/b/c/d
<0> and the mobo is sde
<0> :|
<0> that took WAY too long to fix
<11> disklabels/lvm <3
Return to
#gentoo
or
Go to some related
logs:
#computers
#qmail
ntfsfix gentoo
#sex
#worldcup
login virtuallyjenna
#politics
#beginner
sanjuancapistranomission
#openbsd
|
|