| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Comments:
<0> hehe
<1> i don't even read IRC i use tty
<0> how can you say NO to FREE money!
<0> I use brail
<2> soul|w0rk: is he the guy with the question mark jacket?
<1> yes
<0> jacket?
<0> try suit
<0> pants match the damn jacket :(
<0> http://www.asklesko.com/ <<<
<0> and the tie matches too
<0> don't know if it's question marks tho
<0> just seems colorful as well
<3> nice shoes
<0> heheh
<0> green tennis
<1> bitrot
<1> if you went into the hospital and had to be put on life support
<1> would you trust someone who came into the room and said "i'm gonna flash the firmware on this here iron lung"
<3> HAHA
<4> soul|w0rk: that depends, am I on *that* iron lung?
<1> yes
<4> then yes.
<1> i can just imagine astronauts up in space "the control unit for life support keeps locking up" 'that's supposed to be fixed in the latest firmware" "how do i internet from space"
<4> I don't want to iron lung to reset because someone sent it a DCC SEND exploit
<3> haha
<1> one of our network customers gets internet through some satellite service
<1> they call me up to complain about the latency
<1> "800ms is unacceptable, we need you to fix that"
<1> how, exactly, do i adjust the speed of light
<3> 800ms is alittle bad for sat
<3> should be about 300ms off that
<4> soul|w0rk: 800ms is bad, and the speed of light isn't the issue.
<4> it takes ~450ms to bounce up to geosync orbit and back.
<1> this is true
<1> but i am talking about large packets in this case
<3> 0.27 sec is optimal
<3> one way, that is
<1> they were doing like, 6000 byte ICMP pings to our datacenter
<4> MrStabby: 0.27 sec? I thought it was 0.22ish...
<4> soul|w0rk: rofl.
<0> soul|w0rk: since i don't care about anything no i wouldn't care
<3> you might be right, its been a while since i had to mess with sat
<0> at least that way my family can sue the idiot that though that was a good idea at that time
<4> bitrot: you insensitive clod.
<0> soul|w0rk: LOL
<0> soul|w0rk: that's halarious dude
<1> am i missing something
<0> unacceptable haahaha
<0> i love it when customers say that ****
<1> yeah
<1> mostly it just irked me because
<1> "what in the good **** am i going to be able to do about it?"
<0> right
<0> like this one time
<0> this ****ing dip**** called up acting like a huge prick
<0> all angry
<0> kept yelling
<0> TEN MS
<0> you guys made your network TEN MS more laggy WHY
<0> this is IMPACTING MY BUSINESS
<3> hahaha
<0> itold him to send me a detailed letter of why 10ms is impacting his business
<0> he hung up on me
<3> did he mention his "business" is supplying chinese sweat shop dvd pressing factories with warez?
<1> haha
<1> this one guy, who is like 50 and does nothing but sit at home all day playing counterstrike,
<4> bitrot: he was probably a noob that thought the lag was making him **** in his FPS
<0> .
<0> yeah who knows
<0> it was funny
<1> he bitched me out on the phone one day because he noticed that "one out of every 50 packets or so suddenly has higher latency than the rest"
<4> OMG I'M IN CPL, FIX THE LAG!
<1> i am like "do you want me to explain AP power saving to you"
<0> soul|w0rk: lol
<1> and he did
<1> so i did
<0> a lot of people don't understand that icmp is NOT the first priority....
<0> so using ping to test isn't going to give you the best results.
<0> our agg routers don't have icmp as priority
<0> wtf for
<4> bitrot: but then how can I be sure that my ping floods are actually cripling the person?
<0> CannedBar: heh
<1> i can't believe how many of our customers are sitting there with some random gay*** winders ping/traceroute utility, using it 50 thousand times a day, then emailing me with "THERE WAS A 27% INCREASE IN LATENCY FROM THIS HOP TO THIS HOP AT 4:20 PM WHAT'S GOING ON IS SOMETHING DOWN"
<0> soul|w0rk: LOL
<0> It's even better when they call up and ask why website B is not working
<0> i'm like uhh I dunno
<0> it works here
<4> soul|w0rk: I only bitch when our ~10ms response times spike up to 200+
<0> and then they state it works for them at that time too
<1> CannedBar,
<0> and 99% of the time it's a broken router somewhere
<1> normallly, even our longest wireless shots, say 90 miles round trip from our datacenter to the client,
<1> averages around ~8ms
<4> soul|w0rk: then again, this is a busines T1 line :-)
<0> CannedBar: uhh well that's different :)
<1> however, due to the nature of wifi, APs must go into powersave mode while the clients do background scans for noise right?
<0> ppl who call and bitch when they're on a shared network is what urks me
<1> well, that means that for literally less than 1ms
<4> soul|w0rk: I know what AP powersaving mode is.
<1> the client isn't transmitting
<0> and the ashsoles that are like OMG WHY DID YOU ***IGN ME A /24 what are you guys stupid?!
<1> it doesn't impact any data at all, doesn't lower throughput, won't affect games, etc
<0> i want to ****ing drive down there and show him just how stupid we are
<0> what should I do ***ign /32s to each ****ing customer?
<1> but some of our more retarded customers see it as a threat to their security and safety
<1> haha
<0> soul|w0rk: hah i had a 'White hat' call in once, he actually CALLED himself a white hat (never knew there were douche bags of that size on this earth) anyways he stated how us filtering NetBIOS on our modems causes him not to be able to test customers security heh
<0> cus he needs to see if their shares are secure
<0> i wanted to hurt him BADLY
<1> HAHA!!! dude!! i've had the same **** happen to me!
<0> are you seroius?
<0> how is that even possible?
<1> we filter 135-137 and we get a call at least once a month demanding to know why
<1> i am like are you joking
<1> are you high
<0> lol
<0> some ISPs still don't do that ****
<3> well, that's part of the security then
<0> MrStabby: yep
<3> what a clown
<1> so a few of the customers ask us to remove the filtering for their ranges right?
<0> soul|w0rk: and you do that?
<1> we make them file a disclaimer
<0> hah
<0> we say 'no'
<4> soul|w0rk: but then how else am I going to get nude pics of the girl next door from her My Pictures folder?
<1> then i lift the filter
<1> and bam guess what
<5> http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/internet/02/06/internet.attacks.ap/index.html
<1> about 4 of those customers are right now infected with netsky
<1> and their servers got blacklisted
<3> i remember viewing my neighbors' 'my documents' in 2000
<3> that was awesome
<1> haha bitrot another great one, because downtown eugene is packed with wireless, we get a lot of calls from our networking customers demanding to know why their VPN is down or why they can't email, etc... when it turns out their laptop auto-magically connected to some random AP downtown
<3> phisher1: whats funny is I'm surprised we (DoD) aren't blaming "hackers" for what happened day before yesterday
<1> "I AM ON STARBUCKS-54 WHAT IS THIS"
<4> "Behind the scenes, computer scientists worldwide raced to cope with enormous volumes of data that threatened to saturate some of the Internet's most vital pipelines." <---- Seeeee pipelines == tubes
<5> who are they blaming ?
<3> apparently a circuit was cutover and they left an MSPP in loop back
<1> MrStabby, what happened?
<5> looks like to me they are blaming hackers..
<3> flooded a a lot of stuff
<3> lots and lots
<3> took about 3 hours to figure out
<0> soul|w0rk: hehe i've had that before here too
<0> cus twits are in a office complex
<0> and everyone has unseecured wireless
<0> HOORAY
<3> hannibal rising is going to be slick *** slick
Return to
#gentoo
or
Go to some related
logs:
#winxp
#politics
#debian
#winxp
because the collation of the value is unresolved due to a collation conflict
#hardware
#ubuntu
#politics
fresh wordlist
#debian
|
|