@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26



Comments:

<0> spb: I haven't ****ed up anything
<0> oh except when I removed teh libs
<0> but that was an easy fix
<0> and there is nothing wrong with relabeling the FS while it's running nubster
<0> i've read that in several docs for this selinux ****
<0> and i have /.autorelabel
<1> katepls: yeah it's working fine for me on the mipsel (2.6 kernel) target and the armeb target
<1> DaDead: my nice was originally supposed to be CannedBart, but EFNet doesn't let nicks be that long, so this stuck.
<2> this pisses me off.
<2> i have what i believe to be a working sd/mmc reader on my linksys router, and i can't compile the software to make it work from this machine.
<2> actually, i can't even dl the software from this machine!
<3> User: Salec Pasted http://pasteme.com/p.php?id=469
<4> I'm looking for some guidance on an issue I have that seemed to occur after I upgraded to glibc 2.4-r3 from 2.3.5-r2 : my compiler (ver. 3.4.6) doesn't seem to function properly now [configure: error: C++ compiler cannot create executables]
<4> gcc-config -l points to x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6 * ; and bin-utils-config -l points to x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-2.16.1 *
<4> rebuilding binutils with the compiler seems to work fine but I can't find much else that will compile correctly using emerge (e.g. gcc 4.1.1, gmp, mpfr)
<4> I've tried running ldconfig, env-update, source /etc/profile, fix_libtool_files.sh, and binutils-config but nothing seems to help



<3> User: Salec Pasted http://pasteme.com/p.php?id=470
<1> katepls: what is the error you are getting?
<4> should I attempt to downgrade glibc back to 2.3.5? (during the upgrade it forced me to use ntplonly and ntpl ; of which I already had ntpl but not ntplonly) could that be part of my issue ?
<2> CannedBar, letsee
<4> no thoughts? =\
<5> thoughts?
<4> I guess you missed my posts =]
<2> CannedBar,
<2> i got tied up
<2> i'm getting this error
<2> svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/openwrt/branches/buildroot-ng'
<2> svn: PROPFIND of '/openwrt/branches/buildroot-ng': SSL negotiation failed: SSL disabled due to library version mismatch (https://svn.openwrt.org)
<1> oh, lol..... I thought you were getting an error when attempting to crosscompile openssl for a router.
<2> no, when i dl.
<5> me wants gcc 4.2 ...
<5> gimme gimme gimme :)
<2> i hate computers
<1> katepls: you are probably using an old version of neon
<4> when I attempt to re-emerge glibc it fails now with [ configure: error: cannot compute sizeof (long double), 77] ... nor can I compile gcc
<2> this ****ing douchebag wants me to make this soundcard work in his 1999 windows machine.
<2> the ****ing sound driver is no longer available.
<1> I'm using neon 0.26.1
<2> net-misc/neon-0.26.1
<2> same
<2> probably compiled it with a different ssl though. 8)
<2> hopefully that's it.
<1> emerge -DNua subversion ?
<5> xy: gcc is still set to 3.4.6?
<2> i'm about to walk out of this mfer.
<2> i did that twice!
<2> avuD, no N
<1> hehe. dunno then, the N shouldn't matter really, just habit
<4> renihs1: yes ... gcc-config -l points to x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6 *
<1> next time you get a chance try a revdep-rebuild
<2> yeah, i will.
<5> hmmm
<2> CannedBar, rebuilding neon fixed it.. thanks.
<1> cool.
<5> xy, not really any ideas, i would try emerge -e gcc, then try to upgrade again
<1> then it was built against an older version of ssl previously
<5> but i doubt that is pointfull
<5> bla
<5> but hmm
<5> is that in a running system or a chroot?
<4> running system
<5> and with new glibc gcc failes to compile new gcc hmm, ya i guess emerge -e gcc cant hurt but doubt it will help
<5> me has not really thoughts, i upgraded a few 32bit boxes to gcc 4.1.1 today without a hazzle
<1> hmmm, what about using glibc 2.3.6 and gcc 3.4.6 to compile gcc 4.1.1 and glibc 2.4
<1> then switching to the new gcc and glibc and building everything else.
<4> well I'm currently linked to gcc 3.4.6
<4> how can I verify what glibc I'm using ?
<1> doh, I was thinking glibc was one of those lovely slotted packages, silly me.
<4> renihs1 : I'm having trouble compiling anything in my current environment .. I think some lib links are incorrect at the moment
<4> is there an easy way to revert back to an older glibc ?
<5> i wouldnt know about one since the old glibc has been replaced as far as i know
<5> but me doesnt know too much :)
<5> hmm you could actually try to hmm
<5> hehe, maybe i am too stoned but just a general idea, what about setting up distcc, localbox gets 0 jobs (just distributing) and another box compiles? :)
<1> renihs1: easy to build binary packages on the other machine :-P
<1> easier*
<5> bla, but the distcc thingie would be cuter



<5> cute -> cuter?
<5> hmm
<6> hey, CannedBar, remember my harddrive predicament last night?
<5> whats the augmentation of cute?
<5> btw, being on the topic of gcc, anyone tried gcc-4.2 alpha with mpi?
<1> Boerta: yes
<6> i replaced the PSU today
<5> CannedBar, nice brain, i cant even remember what happened today :)
<6> spin up times, seek error rates, spin up retry counts etc etc dropped significantly across the board
<1> cool.
<5> anyhow, me needs faster disks, is it some physical limitation (eg centrifugal force) or why are disks still at slow 210km/h aka 15.000rpm?
<7> anyone here know iptables syntax real well?
<5> real well, hmm
<5> whats there to know about?
<1> renihs1: heat.
<5> heat????
<5> gotta be kidding?
<5> really?
<1> 15,000rpm disks are ****ing hot
<7> renihs, how do I put in a rule that says forward all traffic coming into on interface1 to a gateway on interface2
<5> hmm actually hmm how do you cool things in a vacuum?
<7> (source routing)
<7> well, not even all traffic just traffic matching realm x
<5> forward or snat?
<5> thats different to me :)
<7> renihs forward, I dont wanna do any form of nat
<5> you dont need an iptables rule for that ...
<5> just enable ip_forwarding?
<7> renihs, I wanna forward all traffic coming in on eth0 matching realm X to a forward host on eth1
<7> no, uhhh I wanna forward to a specific gateway
<7> dependant on realm
<5> you need iptables to drop or mangle stuff
<5> ah
<7> renihs I need iptables to match the realm of the ip prefix
<1> renihs1: heat is merely radiation, so things can still disappate heat in a vacuum
<5> iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -s 0.0.0.0 -o eth1 -j ACCEPT?
<7> hrm
<5> CannedBar, vaccum has no temperature?
<7> iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -m realm international -o eth1 -j ACCEPT
<7> might work
<1> but modern hd's won't work in a vacuum, they depend on the cushion of air to keep the drive heads floating above the platter
<8> true vacuum should be absolute zero right
<5> CannedBar, AIR???
<1> renihs1: in space the temperature is 0K (or close to it)
<5> why not magnet fields, oh, stupid question
<5> but why not paramagnetic
<5> hmm
<1> renihs1: matter does a better jobs than a weak magnetic field.
<1> s/jobs/job/
<5> Symmetria, yea but dont forget to add a DROP rule (at the ending) so everything else gets dropped
<8> because a vacuum has no m***
<8> therefore it won't have temperature
<5> ya but its not absule zero
<5> just none
<5> absence
<8> which would be absolute zero
<5> no
<5> thats different
<1> renihs1: if you put a thermometer in space, it would read absolute zero (or extremely close to it)
<5> absolute zero, believe me you could alter alot things if that cuold be reached :)
<9> is it possible to get raid5 with intel matrix storage technology working, or should I just use software raid?
<5> i prefer software raid, its alot faster
<5> unless you are really rich :)
<5> CannedBar, no it wont, it would be very hot
<5> in most cases (our solar system)
<5> i mean "hot" for space relations
<5> the thermometer has m*** -> there is radiation -> it would heat
<9> what sort of fs should I use when the machine is going to run the free vmware server?
<1> renihs1: oh heh. gotta think about this one some more.
<5> Nichotin, ext3
<5> in case of the vmware server which is really easy to backup the vmdks, xfs might be cool too
<5> but never really used that
<9> yeah, I was thinking xfs


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #gentoo
or
Go to some related logs:

#sex
delphi pdftotext
#opengl
#photoshop
#stocks
#politics
#firebird
#computers
#mirc
#nhl



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes