| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Comments:
<0> but then i know how to check out svn :P
<1> where do i download the latest policy?
<1> dud
<1> you have m 4 different URLS...........
<1> Lindent Makefile README checkpolicy libselinux libsemanage libsepol policycoreutils selinux-doc
<2> i liked selinux in fc4 but in gentoo its a ballache
<0> Path: .
<0> URL: http://oss.tresys.com/repos/refpolicy/trunk
<0> Repository Root: http://oss.tresys.com/repos/refpolicy
<3> How many deps does xorg-x11 HAVE
<0> Two9A: 1842
<1> yeah that's two seperate svn cos
<3> Looks like it
<1> why not keep it the same in one
<3> Taking forever to generate deps
<1> just adding to the already endless nonsense
<0> because the userland stuff is maintained by the nsa guys
<0> and refpolicy is maintained by tresys
<1> k
<1> how do i install refpolicy?
<1> just make install from the trunk?
<4> guys, i need help with gcc i think... i'm trying to tell it to use 4.1.1 but it won't do it
<0> make install-src from trunk/
<0> then into /etc/selinux/refpolicy/src/policy, edit build.conf as i said earlier, make, make install
<0> go to /usr/share/selinux/refpolicy and re-run that semodule command
<5> KlrSpz pasted "GCC Cross compiler not set up right???", view at http://genpaste.pengu.in/pastes/show/298
<4> let me know if anyone has questions... i'm tring to read up on this some more as well
<0> what the hell are you trying to do with klibc anyway
<0> and are you really on a 386 ?
<4> portage wants to emerge it
<6> I'm trying to find the command revdep_rebuild but it's not on my system, so i must have the wrong file name. What is the correct one?
<4> lol no, i noticed that recently and changed it.. don't know why it'd be showing that
<0> so what's your CHOST set to in make.conf ?
<0> ah, screw it
<0> just pastebin emerge info
<4> that is the emerge info
<4> or what other info do you want
<0> i want the output of 'emerge info'
<4> the --info probably eh?
<0> what else ?
<5> KlrSpz pasted "emerge --info", view at http://genpaste.pengu.in/pastes/show/299
<0> your CHOST doesn't match any of your compilers
<0> => broken system
<4> joy
<4> hmmm.. so what do you suggest?
<0> reinstall binutils, gcc, glibc and libtool at the very least
<0> probably twice.
<0> (just to annoy you)
<4> to annoy me?
<0> what else?
<1> same ****ing error
<0> with trunk?
<4> i don't follow what you mean by that
<1> no
<1> i already installed the policy
<1> libsepol.expand_terule_helper: duplicate TE rule for initrc_t insmod_exec_t:process insmod_t
<7> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-494409.html
<0> ok, i want to know what you broke
<1> yeah
<1> what _I_ broke
<1> i did exactly waht you said haah
<3> ****en modular X
<3> look at the ridiculous list of packages I have to merge
<0> what i said worked for me dammit
<0> how much do you trust me ?
<4> spb, according to this post i'm reading, emerging gcc will recompile itself 3 times to make sure it's compiled by itself
<1> none
<4> is this true?
<0> good
<1> i'm so fusturated at this point
<0> i am really rather curious to know what's happening there
<1> this is why linux will never go anywhere
<1> the developers have their head shoved so far up their ***
<0> once it goes into the tree it'll be a bit smoother
<0> and if you want it with no effort use fedora
<1> no where does it say that Treysys handles the policy and that the NSA handles the userland tools
<1> i had problems with the old one
<1> the documentation for this is ****ty as ****
<0> the documentation is mainly written by redhat
<1> yes
<1> the documentatoin is ****ty as ****
<1> i was reading a book
<1> and he was using the god damn GUI tools
<1> it's like 'ookay'
<1> i don't have the gui tools
<1> people should stop thinking that LINUX IS ****ING FEDORA
<1> b
<1> but yeah
<1> for servers
<1> freebsd > Linux
<1> BY FAR
<1> i'm glad i didn't switch fully
<1> what a heaping pile of garbage
<0> and the selinux page on sf says "userland is here, policy is maintained by tresys here"
<1> i can implement secuirty measures that are, guess what, ALRAEDY BUILT IN
<1> I don't have to us a different ****ing kernel to get the same ****ing results
<1> what a bunch of nonsense
<0> selinux is already built in
<1> oh and waste of time
<1> no it's not
<0> sure it is
<1> you have to use another kernel
<1> hardened
<1> no
<1> it's not
<0> no you don't
<0> it's in ****ing vanilla
<1> well
<1> you still need all these policies and stupid bull****
<1> where in freebsd
<0> my laptop runs selinux with the vanilla kernel
<1> there are no poliicies
<0> where in freebsd you have no MAC
<1> it's smart enough to use the ****ing system users
<1> just good ol acls
<1> yeah but thanks for your help anyways
<1> but it was just a huge waste of time
<0> which put you at just the same level as a default linux install
<1> at least i understand now i can never use linux for waht i want
<8> lol
<1> mainly bcuase it's a waste of time
<8> that's a bit general isn't it?
<0> only because you give up too easily
<1> dude the ****ing install is not a problem
<1> i had it 'runnin'g
<0> everything's a waste of time if you stop half way through it
<1> the worthless policies and userland tools for this stupid nonsense is what the problem was
<1> STOP 1/2 way through it?!
<1> I haven't gotten this thing to function as it should
<1> now using TWO DIFFERENT SOURCES
<1> the other sources that gentoo recommends are pointless as ****
<1> yeah let me not be able to su or sudo
<1> wow
<0> the sources that gentoo uses by default are outdated
<1> yes
<1> and linux is outdated
<0> and you can su fine if you're in the right role
<1> wrong dude
<1> again
<1> for the 5th time
<0> i'm running the gentoo policy here
<1> i was in the staff_r ****ing ROLE
<0> YES
<1> and the sysadm_r ROLE
<1> R STAND SFOR ROLE
<1> NO
<2> bitrot: try fc5, it all works great
<0> and you need sysadm_r to su
<2> ;)
<1> i had to newrole -r EVERY TIME
<0> right
Return to
#gentoo
or
Go to some related
logs:
#politics
#cisco
hivemail + crack
TExplorerButton
#netbsd
#politics
#fedora
#politics
#gentoo
clubyvette
|
|