| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Comments:
<0> Tonight@8:00pm
<0> court TV > *
<1> JPres: have you heard about LEAP?
<2> tank god tomorrow is friday
<2> the weekend
<3> i have a good buzz
<3> bourbon ftw
<2> good Murex
<2> nurse that buzz
<3> drinking away my car
<4> here is why alabama is bad:
<4> http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2004/09/red_states_feed.html
<3> too many words
<4> for every $1 in taxes paid, alabama receives $1.61 back.
<2> nice
<2> good return
<4> ergo Alabama is a welfare state
<2> they have white, older gentlemen doing their bidding on K Street
<2> very effectivly I might add
<4> in contrast, for every $1 California sends in, it gets 81 cents back
<3> california is stupid
<2> californians are too liberal
<3> they **** at business
<2> too progressive
<4> yes, that must be why we have the third largest economy in the world :P
<2> californians created that gas problem by making that version of gas that limtied o2 output
<2> or whatever it did
<4> what the hell are you talking about
<2> californains always got those tighter emissions laws
<5> Murex, no MMS
<5> :(
<4> yeah, but did you ever see LA before they did that?
<5> where was your car?
<3> in front of the house
<5> damn
<2> Number-6, I drove over Altamont last fall, I saw the brown blanket
<5> possible bright side here
<2> it's ugly
<5> when is the last time you waxed it?
<3> 2 years ago
<5> hmmm
<3> at least
<5> well
<1> LA is doomed
<5> it will probably still buff out pretty well
<2> I love California but man do they have smog
<5> rubbing compound + buffer
<1> JPres: do most people in law enforcement know the drug war is a waste?
<4> things were a lot worse before emissions standards improved, smog testing was instituted, and the fuel was reformulated.
<5> if you are good with a buffer and not burning paint
<3> yeah im n ot
<3> so i gotta pay to have it fixed
<5> spike723, most people involved with the drug war probably don't want to work at McDonalds when the drug war ends.....
<4> ah, alabama is actually more welfare than it was before
<4> http://www.taxfoundation.org/files/sr139.pdf
<4> now it's up to $1.71 back for every $1 paid
<3> oh goddamn it shut the **** up
<5> Murex, do you know anyone who details cars, and won't **** you over?
<1> JPres: so why don't they put the DEA to use on the mexican border?
<4> alabama--
<1> mexicans--
<3> JPres: yes, and he will be handling it
<5> cool
<5> I'm guessing paint won't be required.
<3> JPres: hopefully
<3> i sent him pics, he is pretty sure he can do it without painting
<5> the worst part will be the plastic and rubber
<2> Murex, what did you wreck?
<5> however
<3> deadnow: http://trepullins.net/01-25-2007/son-of-a-bitch/
<3> i didnt wreck anything
<3> mothert****ing nigglets
<5> he may be able to duplicate it on the other side....
<5> and then you can claim it is custom paint.
<1> Murex: was it some local niggers?
<2> damn
<2> somebody sprayed you?
<5> spike723, when I get elected president in 2012
<3> no they set my car on fire and raped my wife
<3> yes, my car got sprayed
<2> Murex, you gotta be pissed
<3> dude i am ****ing livid
<2> majorly
<2> I'd be loading a gun
<5> the first 2 groups of people I will put on the unemployment line are Tax Professionals, and DEA agents.
<3> loading .. i keep two loaded
<5> Murex, I'm guessing you didn't notice till you got to work?
<2> I had it happen to me once
<4> nah don't put them in the unemployment line... help them get jobs as road crew or sanitation enigneers.
<2> it was paint stripper
<3> JPres: uh no i saw it right when i got out, the smiley faces can't be missed
<1> JPres: and put them on the border
<3> out/in
<3> in the morning
<5> smiley faces?
<3> whatever
<2> Murex, that can probably be buffed off
<3> JPres: on the p***enger windows
<3> in black paint
<5> OH
<5> didn't see those
<5> wtf man
<5> anyone else get hit?
<3> yeah evidentally a few others got hit as well
<5> so it wasn't personal
<3> no
<5> most likely
<3> it was ranfom
<5> well, that's a plus
<3> random
<3> no that makes it worse
<3> i'd rather it be for cheatin or someting
<5> well, it means they won't likely be back.
<3> so i'd atleast deserve it
<5> yea
<5> I see that too.
<2> still makes you think you should keep a night scope, tripod mounted, electronically controlle rifle on guard
<5> Number-6, do you think your accountant would make a very good road crewman?
<2> with remote
<4> JPres: they can be retrained.
<5> I don't know that I would completely get rid of the DEA, but the IRC code, as it applies to humans would fit on a single one sided 8.5 X 11 sheet of paper
<5> typed
<4> JPres: that way they're still contributing to the economy.
<5> double spaced.
<5> IRC
<5> heh
<5> IRS
<5> basically, there would be a standard deduction of somewhere between 30k - 40k
<2> right off the top
<2> I'm with you
<5> and 2 people who live at the same address would be able to double said deduction if they wanted to file together
<4> just have everyone file separately.
<2> no matter what ***
<5> a possible additional deduction for children under 18
<5> and nothing else.
<4> it doesn't make sense to file jointly
<5> it does if one doesn't work.
<2> jointly is *** discrimination
<4> then that other person need not file at all.
<5> outside the house.
<4> if you don't work, then you don't have income
<4> so why file
<5> deadnow, not my way
<5> because that would sum up to a 'marriage penalty'
<5> maybe
<4> how?
<2> and these family medical plans, what if they have 18 kids?
<4> there could only be a 'penalty' if you taxed married people at a different rate.
<5> ok, that would be open to negotiation
<4> just tax everyone the same
Return to
#freebsd
or
Go to some related
logs:
#beginner
python signal module
#stocks
#politics
#computers
#3dsmax
jannies got a gun
#beginner
#3dsmax
#windows
|
|