| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Comments:
<0> I hate that all variables are globals in each movie clip. I would really want them to be isolated in each function
<0> It's been making my script go all wierd many many times
<1> the truth is that it's a complex and limited runtime and documentation is not there to help you with the hard spots
<2> are there any array-loop-methods? like foreach in php ?
<3> zip
<3> You can make functiontime vars
<0> They really need to redo flash from the ground, it would have been so cool to have a solid language with the capabilities of flash
<1> oh it was mostly going up and around diferent scenes and and clicking buttons
<3> I pretty much have no code in clips anymore
<1> doing simple interation but nothing really more then that
<3> No matter the size of the project you can still manage it
<1> there wasnt even a scripting language. actionscript was introduced in later versions i believe
<4> hmm splitted
<1> yea, but getting code out of movieclips can be a serious pain when you are giving yr first steps toward that
<1> it will play LOTs of tricks with you
<0> i usually have 1 movieclip where i script things in
<0> so i don't need to have them int he root
<1> i remember i was obcessed about centralizing code ( still am ) and when if first started it put me in SERIOUS trouble
<1> if first = I first
<5> like.. the mafia?
<1> yea, like the russian mafia
<1> and MS
<6> with AS 2, u should not have that kind of troubles
<1> ;)
<5> ns?
<6> nor tat kind of preocupation
<5> ms?
<0> m$
<1> NiB, indeed but i'm not a fan of that model
<1> you are refering to lybrary method of ***ociating cl*** and MC
<1> it's a cool method but I dont use it much
<6> just to cl***es
<7> Hey have any of you tried the http://www.digitalbrochuredesign.com/image-zoom/ ?
<6> why the hell would i use that thing
<7> could someone help me to make it possible to encrypt the input so the user cant see it in the sorucecode?
<7> i dont want the user to be able to see what image is being used
<6> they will be in cache u know
<6> in the browser cache
<6> if the user is smart enougth to look at the source..u can be sure he will also look at his browser cache
<7> good point
<6> :)
<7> any way around it ?
<6> none
<6> basiclay the web is a publishing platform..if u don't want other to have it..don't publish it :)
<6> u can take screenshots,...etc... there is always a way
<6> use same watermarks or somethin... i can hardly think about somehtin better
<7> yeah
<7> im making a page where people can sell there images
<7> so i want the user to be see a 500x500 copy of the image
<6> so watermarks are the way
<7> but i would like to show the accutal pixels
<6> user should also be able to download a 500x500 watremarlked image anyway
<6> i never buy any image if i can't test it in my layout
<6> i don' care if it's watermarked, it's just to see how it look in the page
<6> and if it looks ok i buy it
<6> what u can perhaps do, is have a big image server side, and have php/gd2 send only the zoomed part..so user only get a piece or at best many pieces of the image
<7> yeah i thought of that to
<7> like cut out a 500x500 part in the middle of the original image and put a bit watermark over it
<7> Do you know how to do that with gd2?
<6> no no i was thinking of somethin where u can realy navigate oin the image, but each time u move or change zoom ratio, gd2 cut a part of the original image and only send that part
<6> le's say your view area is 200x200, u will only receieved jpg that are 200x200, u never get the full image at its full size
<7> yes i know, that was my idea to
<7> but i thought of using simply a strict viewpoint
<7> klick on the image and you get a zoomed image of the center of the image
<6> i'm not sure it would be very usefull
<7> you can at least see the quality
<6> u ever worked in a design agency ?
<7> No
<6> nobody works without previews
<7> You get a preview
<7> a 500x500 thum of the entire image
<6> a preview u can put in your layout
<6> in xpress or whatever u use
<7> yes its a jpg
<7> 500x500 thumb and if you click it you get a 500x500 from the center of the imag in acctual pixels
<6> aren't u tryin toprevent user from getting that by using flash ? or i mssed your point
<7> no just to get the fullsize image
<6> oooook
<7> The problem i had with that script was that i had to enter the filename and path of the fullsizeimage in order to make it work
<7> and you could see it simply by viewing the source
<6> or anyway..in the cache
<7> yes
<7> i didnt think of that
<7> =)
<7> but what do you think of the other solution ?
<6> i'm not sure somethin automated, takin the middle of the image is very good... it could be a plain color..like a nice 500x500 red sqaure...
<6> does it really help user to see te quality ? :))
<7> true...
<7> Well a sample 1 and Sample 2 thgen
<7> from 2 different places
<6> http://www.sephiroth.it/file_detail.php?id=131#
<7> yeah but i dont know how to redo that one to suit me
<6> doesn't it suit ur need as it is ? except perhaps the size ?
<6> u never get the full size image
<2> how do i remove leading and trailing white's in a variable ?
<7> NiB: i know you want to make a flashapp for me ;)
<6> sure, u want my rates ?
<7> free + ha hug =)
<7> a
<2> NiB: how do i remove whitespaces from a string?
<6> if food was falling from the sky and if the roof over my family head was free it would be a real pleasure Ize
<7> =)
<7> well i will just have to try to solve it
<6> myString.split(" ").join(); ?
<2> hehe then you remove them all.. i just wanna remove leading and trailing
<6> NiB: how do i remove whitespaces from a string?
<6> i guess u can do that with regesp
<2> hm that complex? arent there any string.removeEndAndStartIfWhite?
<2> :D
<2> is there a function named isWhite ?
<2> !find isWhite
<6> lol
<2> !find -c isWhite
<6> which flash version are u using ?
<2> 8
<2> developing for mx2004
<0> I think it should be illegal for users to use old versions of flash player.
<0> Like some global LAW enforced by UN
<3> Or a poke in the eyes
<0> if (oldflashplayer) { auto_poke_in_eyes(); }
<0> -auth_*
<0> i cant type today sorry
<0> :)
<0> i just type i don't really think i guess
<3> if (oldflashplayer && !wearingGl***es) { auto_poke_in_eyes(); } else { auto_kick_in_balls(); }
<0> Even better
<0> if (oldflashplayer && !wearingGl***es) { auto_poke_in_eyes(); } else if (oldflashplayer) { auto_kick_in_balls(); }
<0> is better i guess ;)
<8> Vgslag i've found a very mysterious bug in the flash player... just in case you stumble over it:
<8> if you have wmode set to transparent, you can not enter any special char like "@" in any input text in mozilla.
<8> tested with version 8 of the player plugin
<8> i also tried to export to other flash versions, 7, 6 and 5 but did not change behaviour..
<8> removing the wmode param solved the problem
<8> you can easily reproduce the bug
<0> Oh thats why one of my text fields doenst work from a project 1 year ago :)
<0> special chars in mozilla didnt work had noo idea why
<8> hehe
<8> did not test it with other plugin versions
<8> only firefox/mozilla, in ie it works
<9> god damn
<9> I can't believe this
<8> hey mord
<3> Mov
<9> I just wasted 3 hours debugging my thing, and it turns out it was the IT guys that had forgot to move my crossdomain.xml when they did server updates
<3> Found that out a fair old while ago with some other things
<9> god damn ***clowns
<3> A hack file upload wouldnt work because of the wmode implementation in FF
<9> why can't flash give me an error message? like, NO ACCESS!
<9> god damn hell
<10> If you look at requests you would have seen it looking for crossdomain.xml and getting 404
Return to
#flash
or
Go to some related
logs:
#nhl
#gamedev
#windows
rangvers
#beginner
runkenschnabel
#politics
#debian
#hardware
#linux-noob
|
|