@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2



Comments:

<0> thank you, opsec, that will be very helpful :)
<1> yea it is
<1> it's sort of like a total yum "refresh"
<1> removes all headers and downloaded packages
<2> hmmm
<3> anyone know how to get songs to auto play in xmms when i double click them
<4> Billbong: right click and select 'open with'
<4> they should open in xmms from then on
<3> ya i know i did that but it just adds it to the play list and doesnt play it
<5> heya! mind if i ask a question? hehe
<6> U just did, no?
<5> recently i setup ip masquerading (sucessfully woot!) on my Fedora box, now i need to open up a few ports for eg. a Teamspeak server, any links or guids / tips you could provide?
<5> i've got it installed and running np @ all, but i keep getting connection refused while connecting, i'll ***ume it's the locked down 8767 port, i just have no clue how to go aboutoening it
<1> Cricht0n: iptables
<5> what would i put into my iptables in order to open ports for certain apps, eg.8767?
<7> is https://myserver/file.html forbidden by default?



<8> what can I use for burning dvd .iso, .img, is there a linux version of dvddecrypter?
<8> i am so sick of windows
<9> is there some way to set up an redudant network connection with fedora using a computer with 2 NICs connected to 2 switches in the same network, if one NIC och switch failes the computer should identify this and use the other NIC instead
<9> I've been trying with bridging but I get arp storms all the time
<10> Hi
<11> Hello?
<11> Anyway, I was just wondering if it's possible to upgrade Red Hat 9 straight to Fedora Core 4.
<11> ?
<11> Anyone?
<12> yeah should worjk
<11> Any problems to be expected?
<12> dunno never doine it
<12> always formatted
<11> ...
<11> I just don't want to waste time downloading.
<12> it only 4 cds
<12> shouldnt take more than a hour top d/l
<11> Yeah...
<11> 555
<12> Linux bert.monavale.jobro.net 2.6.14-1.1653_FC4 #1 Tue Dec 13 21:32:09 EST 2005i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
<13> hi peeps
<13> can anyone tell me how to add services to a fedora machine while booting?
<14> hello?
<1> .
<15> hrmm .. i'm trying to install a couple of things.. is there some tool that just installs rpms including dependencies ?
<0> it's called "yum"
<0> Use it. Love it. Introduce it to your mother.
<16> Anyone know how I can delete a file on Fedora?
<16> the command 'del' doesnt work here.
<17> uhm.... can someone tell me which file to pick from http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/fedora/linux/extras/4/i386/ and what "not pre-configured" means?
<4> that bot seriously needs a new home
<18> hello people
<18> are u awake?
<18> I have a problem with kded
<18> 1. I boot into my core 3, 2. enter in KDE during the usual process of init 5
<18> and then start a terminal
<18> the pecurious thing I noticed
<18> is that I have 3 users loged on
<18> NOT 2...
<18> the pts/0 and pts/1 , along with :0
<18> anyone?
<19> m6s: whats the matter?
<18> 1.booting my fedora
<18> 2.enter in the kde
<18> 3.open a terminal
<18> 4.run who, or run users
<19> ok
<18> what do you see?
<19> i see 5 me's
<18> hmmm
<18> well close the 5 yous
<19> er ?
<18> simple
<18> when I get in
<18> and I have nothing more open than the terminal inside my kde
<18> I see, 3 users
<19> ok.. thats fine
<18> loged in with the who or users command
<18> ?!?!?!?!??!fine?!??!?!?!?



<19> sure..
<19> type: w
<19> what does the WHAT say?
<18> kded
<18> kdeinit
<19> there you go
<19> kded = 1 .. kdeinit = 2 .. term = 3
<18> it says, :0 startkde
<18> pts/0 kded[kdeinit]
<18> pts/1 w
<19> :0 = x
<19> so its .. kded = 1 .. startkde = 2 term = 3 then
<18> yes I see that....
<18> but...
<18> since when kded opens an account
<18> is this normal, in the blueprints of kde?
<19> it obviously needs a login shell to run
<18> "obviously", or "honestly"
<18> :-)
<18> ?
<19> er.. what?
<18> well
<18> opio in the #kde
<18> run the 'w'
<18> command
<18> and sees only one user
<18> for startkde
<18> he has gentoo
<19> sure
<19> im still not seeing the complaint..
<18> again sure?
<19> you are not wanting kded to run a login shell?
<18> I never asked to run this kde shell
<18> well I asked one terminal, when I clicked it
<18> this terminal of kded came right from the boot up process
<18> USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT
<18> m6s :0 - 19:04 ?xdm? 5:40 0.02s /bin/sh /usr/bin/startkde
<18> m6s pts/0 - 19:04 2:58m 0.00s 3.04s kded [kdeinit]
<18> m6s pts/1 - 19:21 0.00s 0.07s 0.00s w
<18> 19:04
<19> does opio use xdm?
<18> he just run startx
<19> so it could be something in xdm that does it?
<18> perhaps
<18> is it normal now that? 19:04 during the process of boot, two created users, one from kded just like that
<19> could be running it as its the default login for xdm session?
<18> is n't the user xdm ? as in the first line of the who command mentioned?
<18> I got confused now a little, it's not normal that I have two users m6s, 19:04 created, one from kded without asking that on this exactly time, right??? The third it is only the terminal I asked to run.
<19> sure its normal..
<19> why isnt it normal?
<19> all it means is that kded has been started in a login shell
<18> how can I be sure for that? check it out on y own? see the proof?
<18> LOL see the word of God ? allelouhea!
<18> LOL
<18> hey I didn;t insult you! did I? I just be friendly.....yes?
<19> hrmm... er ok
<19> fact is i see you just creating an issue for nothing..
<19> who cares if it runs in a login shell or not?
<19> it doesnt alter anything ..
<18> well
<19> well nothing.. you need kded to be running..
<18> it is a matter since I know that anything runs in linux as services only in their own environment
<18> xdm, users, root, cdr
<19> yes?
<18> etc etc etc
<18> so after a huge pile of logs from some IPs which they try to make a brutal access
<18> I checked once this little command and gave me 3 users instead of really 2, which I expected and I don;'t know why
<18> at least not since now
<19> if you think that they have exploited you by replacing kded .. think again
<19> if you are going to replace a daemon.. then you would replace something like cron.. or append something to xinetd
<19> something where it can control time
<18> if someone could do some hacking I don't know if they could compile the kded itself, they could use javascript of kde which is everywhere
<19> and what if you arent logged in?
<19> no kde is a terrible choice in attack vector


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #fedora
or
Go to some related logs:

musclemaniax
#delphi
#beginner
#mirc
malaybalay words and language
#hardware
#nhl
#windowsxp
#politics
#beginner



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes