| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Comments:
<0> is kinda obvious
<1> how can you not know :/
<0> didn't really pay much attention
<0> but of course dual
<0> will slam a single core cpu
<0> in well threaded apps
<1> the X2 didnt slam my P4
<1> its better
<0> all depends in what
<1> 3dmark96
<1> 06
<0> yah
<1> the X2 didnt slam my P4
<0> games and game benchmarks
<0> aren't exactly greatly threaded apps
<0> video encoding, software 3d rendering
<0> etc
<0> maya
<0> 3dsmax
<0> stuff that's been designed for SMP
<0> for ages
<1> I thought 3dmark06 was
<0> it's better
<0> but not exactly what I call great
<0> the fx at work
<0> clocks pretty well
<0> 425mhz core, 760Mhz mem
<1> I really dont see any differance in daily use from that X2 and this P4
<1> there tied to me
<1> :/
<0> yah
<0> you have HT
<0> which makes a diff
<1> and the X2 is more $
<0> in multi-tasking
<0> turn off HT
<0> and see
<1> I was expecting more from X2 tho...not a tie :P
<0> for everyday use
<1> I was actually expecting more from amd64
<0> HT and X2 are comparable
<1> that never happened
<1> :}
<0> just X2 has more power available
<0> per thread
<1> yeah...its nice and fast
<0> because of it's physical 2 cores
<0> but having a CPU that can accept multiple threads
<0> on daily multi-tasking
<0> changes the dynamics
<0> of the operating system
<0> either physical
<0> or virtual
<0> that's why a64 won in nearly all game benches
<0> but for daily work
<0> people found P4's HT
<0> smoother
<0> games being up until now
<0> mostly single threaded
<1> so, wich would you prefer to play UT on...AMD x2 with my 6800XT at work or this P4/6800GT
<0> same difference
<0> UT isn't a viable bench anymore
<0> outdated/old engine
<0> does stress any recent cpu
<1> so, wich would you prefer to play UT2k7 on...AMD x2 with my 6800XT at work or this P4/6800GT
<0> p4/6800GT
<0> but unrelated to CPU
<1> yeah
<0> it's a 16pipe vs an 8pipe
<0> how much did you get
<0> in 2k5
<0> on your 6800gt/p4
<1> 2k5?
<0> 3dmark
<1> oh
<0> 2k5
<0> 2005
<1> ?? jefreymonvideocard
<1> the X2 and this video card would be best :>
<2> I bought an X2 yesterday
<1> WHAT!
<2> im lying
<1> lol
<0> I'm at 5567
<0> on a slower cpu
<1> its all grafics
<1> not CPU
<0> cpu makes a diff
<1> ATI is bad
<1> :P
<1> hehe
<0> 5401 to 5567
<0> for 200mhz cpu speed
<0> increase
<1> nvidia is better
<0> so I'd imagine
<1> there roadmap is good
<0> that with an equivalent cpu
<0> as in around 2.6ghz
<1> nvidia
<1> better
<0> which would be similar to a 3.8ghz
<1> :P
<1> nvidia <------
<0> I'd be around the same results
<0> as you are at
<1> you have to get over that ATI brainwashing
<1> :]
<0> so lets say it scales proportionally.
<1> dont you have any nvidia cards?
<0> hear me out
<0> lets say it scales proportionally
<0> and I gain 166 points
<0> per 200mhz
<0> so jumping to 2.6ghz
<1> do you have any nvidia cards?
<0> which would be 2 jumps
<1> do you have any nvidia cards?
<0> would equal 332 points
<0> extra
<1> do you have any nvidia cards?
<1> hehe
<1> comon man
<0> which would bump the result to 5899
<1> thats all thearedical
<0> which is only 3 points
<0> off yours
<0> ok
<0> 4
<1> ATI's drivers are bad
<1> thats a truth
<0> interface wise
<0> yes
<0> CCC is a disaster
<0> and the previous one wasn't great
<0> either
<0> but since I don't run any of those
<0> just plain drivers
<0> that's not an issue
<0> 333points from 2.2 to 2.6ghz
<1> yeah yeah
<0> is actually quite possible
<1> :]
<0> which would bring me exactly to where you are
<0> afterall
<0> x800XL and 6800GT
<0> are direct
<0> competitors
<1> if you had my card + coolbits
<1> it would be more of an increase
Return to
#dsl
or
Go to some related
logs:
ccbill.log
ati radeon x800gto firmware update
#3dsmax
#sql
+actionscript +createchildren +init
#politics
Q886903
#freebsd
#solaris
teaneh .com
|
|