| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Comments:
<0> i dunno.
<0> sometimes I think it's better for them not to contribute.
<0> :x
<1> God, I hate buying memory for computers sometimes.
<2> Can anyone think of a reason Borland.Studio.StarTeam.dll or Borland.SCI.Gate.dll would bug out on loading BDS? They are throwing exceptions, but then BDS loads up anyways
<3> warez version?
<3> yawwwwwn
<4> damnit
<4> I always put the ? and : in the iterary operator wrong
<2> no, legitimate architect version
<0> i recently discovered the rather awesome ?? operator in C#
<4> C#2
<4> unless you meant ?
<0> no, ??
<0> I think they added it for nullable types
<4> yeah
<4> it's new in v2
<0> but apparently it works just as well with reference types
<0> and if you thought ?: was a confusing operator to read, ?? it just mind-boggling :)
<4> hehe
<4> Well I tend to write them in the wrong order
<4> : and ?
<4> instead of ? and :
<0> really?
<0> I never really had a problem with that.
<4> Dunno why
<4> I'd much rather use the Chrome IIF internal function
<0> it's pretty much like natural langage.
<4> way more obvious
<0> is x ? then y : else 0
<0> yeah.
<0> I liked Iif in VB too except it wasn't short-circuiting.
<0> stupid VB
<4> Chrome's is
<0> of course.
<0> cuz that makes sense!
<0> well actually, it kinda doesn't make sense
<0> but every other language in the world short-circuits
<4> it's like one of the 6 internal function.
<0> :)
<0> I just reinstalled X-Chat and all it's scripting plugins
<0> so now I have to decide if I want to learn perl, python, tcl, or ruby.
<0> well, I know Tcl, and Perl kinda.
<4> With the scripts you wrote
<4> I would ***ume tcl would come natural
<4> then again
<0> ahaha
<4> I doutb TCL actually can become natural.
<0> Tcl is a lot of things.
<0> NATURAL
<0> not one of them
<4> oh yeah
<4> I think it's besides VB and Whitespace that acts completely different on the basis of an enter.
<4> the only language *
<0> it's a completely logical and internally self-consistant language.
<0> it's like LISP for idiots.
<0> everything's a list
<4> Well Lisp is functional
<4> TCL is still procedural
<0> true
<0> I also don't get all the hype around Python
<4> same for ruby.
<0> it looks just as cobbled-together as PHP
<4> it's "yet another scripting language"
<0> it's got a gigantic built-in library. and it's "OOP" in some twisted, javascripty sense
<4> heh
<4> the most used internet lib for Python
<4> is called "Twisted"
<0> but seriously, it's bad enough that some language treat enter as special.
<0> Python treads *leading tabs* as special
<4> it does?
<0> yes
<4> I tend to consider Python as execute only
<0> blocks, like loops/ifs/etc
<0> are set off by indentiation
<0> as in
<4> yikes.
<4> the end of the loo
<4> loop
<0> you indent the block, and as soon as the indent ends, that's the end of the block
<4> is found by looking at the identation?
<0> yes.
<4> indent*
<4> ouch
<4> you checked out the new LINQ stuff btw/
<4> That's cool
<0> a bit.
<0> not too much yet.
<4> say you have an array of cl***es
<4> and you want to sort it on a field
<0> I'm still trying to bring our internal .NET libraries up to 2.0 with generics
<0> speaking of stupid operators.
<0> C# has a :: operator
<0> and for the life of me I can't figure out why.
<4> yeah but that's only for scoping.
<0> but how is it any different from the . operator?
<0> how is System::Int32 different from System.Int32 ?
<4> How to: Use the Namespace Alias Qualifier (C# Programming Guide)
<4> hrmm
<4> why don't msdn links work
<4> KutuluMik: It's useful if you have something in scope that hides in front of a namespace
<0> ...
<4> cl*** System { ... }
<0> so if you're stupid enough to have a cl*** named "System" ?
<4> yep
<0> brilliant
<0> I guess I shouldn't judge, though
<4> one of those things
<4> you really shouldn't use
<0> this project I inherited has ~ 25 namespaces in it's heirarchy.. 6 of them have an Application cl*** and 19 of them have a Process cl***.
<4> nice
<0> yes.
<4> so if you wanna use the real Process cl***
<4> you have to alias it
<0> we use namespace aliases rather extensively.
<0> yes.
<4> I have one lib
<4> that uses "Type"
<4> as a cl*** name
<0> kutuluware.appname.business.financial.payments.Process pmts = new kutuluware.appname.business.financial.payments.process();
<4> hehe
<0> kutuluware.appname.business.scheduling.students.Process students = new kutuluware.appname.business.scheduling.students.process();
<4> anyway:
<0> ok, Type might be worse than System
<4> Array.Sort(mylist, (a, b) -> (a.Field1.CompareTo(b.Field)));
<0> yeah, I've seen that
<0> I'm kinda concerned, though.
<0> our apps run so goddamned slow as it is.
<4> well
<4> the code this translates to:
<0> it's all I can do to make then perform remotely as well as pre-.net apps, I'm scared to layer another level of indirection into them
<4> Array.Sort(mylist, new CompareDelegate(mycomparemethod));
<4> int Mycomparemethod(Cl***1 a, Cl***1 b) { return a.Field1.CompareTo(b.Field1); }
<4> it's a shortcut
<4> to write the same code
<4> just with a lot less work
<0> yesterday I wrote a data access method that uses a DataReader with hard-coded field indices in it because using the names was too slow :(
<4> ah
<4> hrm
<0> and I had an awesome time explaining to the rest of the team why: int a = (int)myDataSet["Field1"]
<0> performs faster than: int a = int.Parse(myDataSet["field1"].ToString());
<4> hah
<4> clueless
<0> I'm not kidding. that's our entire data layert.
<0> of course, I later found out why.
<4> lemme guess
<4> they had a Byte field somewhere in the db
<0> our DBA arbitrarily chose to make some fields smallint and some fields tinyint
<4> that didn't cast to Integer properly.
<0> yup.
<4> :)
Return to
#delphi
or
Go to some related
logs:
#stocks
#politics
#online
#red
#gamedev
#stocks
#barcelona
#3dsmax
Uploader.Files.Items Find name of the field
#hardware
|
|