| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Comments:
<0> which is not big
<0> it talks to the codemodel
<0> which is 100% chrome
<0> compiler is c# code
<0> filecodemodel is c# or chrome
<0> debug expression evaluator is C#
<0> (it is completely impossible to debug an expression evaluator with itself)
<1> heh
<0> compiler is C# for obvious reasons
<2> this pisses me off...
<2> sets limited to 256
<2> now i have towrite butt-ugly code for a simple vlaidation routine.
<1> Slap it in a function so its not quite as ugly.
<1> Or, at least, you can hide the ugly :)
<0> MrBtrieve: slap it in a case statement
<2> no way around ugly
<0> case ci of 40050..41110, 42005, 42010, 42030, 42035, 42040, 42045: Res := true; else result := false end;
<2> yeah, that's the only option.
<0> in the end
<0> that will result in the big if
<0> but at least its readable
<3> party time, bbl
<4> does this sound like a bug? i got an error from the db that a column unknown... change the order in the FROM clause, and it works correctly
<4> ie, "from table_foo f, table_bar b" vs "from table_bar b, table_foo f"
<0> sound like it, of course.
<0> wait, column unknown?
<4> yeah
<0> that is interesting.
<0> which dbserver?
<4> mysql of course :P
<0> oooh
<4> "FROM phpbb_sessions s, phpbb_users u, phpbb_topics t LEFT JOIN phpbb_posts p ON (p.post_time >= u.user_lastvisit)" doesn't work, if i switch users and topics it works (barfs on the lastvisit
<4> Unknown column 'u.user_lastvisit' in 'on clause'
<0> heh
<0> BUG!
<0> well it IS mysql.
<4> yeah, thats why i said "of course" :P
<0> there could be a perfectly valid reason for it though
<0> in their eyes perfect.
<4> yeah
<4> hmm
<4> they DID upgrade the db yesterday
<1> Sounds liek a bug in the optimizer.
<4> Drk`Angel: well didnt work even if i added u.whatever to the "select" part
<4> so...
<1> Yeah, still.
<1> The optimizer is dropping something that it shouldn't be. Almost guaranteed.
<4> hmm
<4> well
<4> now that i figured how to fix it...
<1> If you have time, fiddle with it some and see if you can reproduce it in a simpler case, and submit a bug report.
<4> well i asked in #mysql if it was a know issue, ill start there :)
<4> argh
<1> Banned yet?
<1> hehe
<4> that was the cut down case, but the full version wont work, because it actually has another statement in the ON clause, and now it complains about that (since it involved t)
<2> latest rumor going around the web - Microsoft purchased Capcom
<0> capcom ?
<1> hm.
<2> game compny
<5> made street fighter!
<4> ok, if i dont do the left join part
<4> it work
<6> isnt that the fighting arcade game company
<4> works
<1> Dunno how capcom is doing nowadays.
<1> But, everything is possible. I mean, they did buy Bungie.
<2> http://news.yahoo.com/photos/ss/events/us/011207sgtplayboy/im:/070111/480/sa10301112336
<4> of course, that defeats half the point of the sql statement
<7> hello again
<8> Greetings, mortal.
<4> right
<4> that was the whole db in my console right there
<9> shalom ;)
<10> mmmm Tilapia
<9> if one can read this ****ty translation then one probaly laugh his *** off http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pravda.ru%2Fscience%2Fplanet%2Fspace%2F208894-3%2F&langpair=ru%7Cen&hl=en&ie=UTF8
<10> pravda.ru?
<1> Showoff. ;)
<9> aha, but in this case name doenst matter ;)
<9> *doesnt
<10> MrNeutron: Are you Russian?
<9> (previously it was main official paper)
<9> Vibes, yep
<10> termoyadernae = thermonuclear?
<9> yes, exactly
<10> ok.
<10> Yeah, this article's kinda crazy.
<9> even ridiculous, IMO ;)
<10> Basically saying that in the near future, companies will produce thermonuclear explosives in factories and anyone will be able to buy them, cheap.
<10> ...so when the terrorists walk in to wal-mart and buy a nuclear bomb, we will all be in deep trouble.
<1> heh
<1> mmmm, FUD.
<9> i think he's refrering to 'cold' fusion reaction but didnt readup about it even in newspaper ;)
<10> Heh. Cheap cold fusion would be a lot more important than any little bomb.
<1> Was going to say, dirty nukes are easy to build. If you can get your hands on enough fissionable material.
<11> rob any hospital and you can do that.
<9> yes, unlimited energy from (almost) empty space
<12> How do I do a procedure/function with different numbers of parameters?
<0> dynamic ?
<0> or several defined number of parameters ?
<0> like default parameters
<0> overloads
<0> or open arays
<12> overloads I think it's called
<10> procedure proc(param: integer); overload;
<10> procedure proc(param: string); overload;
<10> It's that easy.
<10> Though I'm not sure WHY the overload directive was needed, but that's all you have to do.
<12> Aha... great... and I ***ume it's function func(param:integer):integer; overload;
<9> there was a 'nuclear boyscout' kid who tried to build breeding reactor at the backyard ;)
<0> Vibes: easy.
<0> type x = cl*** procedure Test(a: string); end; implementation procedure x.test; begin end;
<0> (that actually compiles)
<10> And?
<0> the overload thing had to be introduced
<0> to disable that support
<0> and allow overloads.
<0> moonlord: saw smallville yet
<13> I love smallville
<10> Ah, I see... I missed the missing param list on the implementation.
<0> yep
<10> I didn't realize you could do that, actually.
<0> it's a leftover
<0> from Pascal.
<10> Interesting.
<0> that said
<0> it won't compile in chrome :)
<0> I'm actually suprised ayou don't know this
<10> Because internally, to the compiler that would be @unitname@x@test$qqrs
<0> if you say so
<0> it maps it to the proper string parameter
<10> Which name includes all the params and everything. So it's easy to differentiate between methods with identical names, as long as the param lists are different.
<0> I never was fond of obfuscating things in this way.
<10> Time to go do some dishes
<4> hmm
<4> would it be hard to have a TCollection where the items could have different properties depending on what they are? (in the object inspector)
<0> LordCrc create a base cl*** for the collection cl***
<0> and have subcl***es inside the collection
<14> Mom! Dad! I'm Home!
<4> ki9a: right, so that each of the items are of my TFoobarCollectionItem ?
<0> yes
<0> but they'd be TFooBarCollectionSubItemWithMoreProperties
<4> righto
<4> id need to make a custom editor though, to add the items i guess
<0> why?
<0> the IDE determines the type
<0> it shows the editor
<0> based on that
<0> devexpress has all sorts of these editors.
Return to
#delphi
or
Go to some related
logs:
msconfig crashes
#computers
#worldcup
assassin garfiled
netbsd xorg binary-package
#worldcup
osb efnet
Try Out NHL Richard Park
#red
#unixhelp
|
|