| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Comments:
<0> i do have another 100mbit card in there tho.. maybe those 2 are making life hard for eachother
<0> although i've put eth0 down, otherwise eth1 wouldn't work
<1> if you want to experiment, use the irqfixup kernel parameter
<0> not exactly sure how tho, kernels isn't my expertise :)
<1> just type that after the kernel name in your bootloader
<2> I have a box with 2 differant domains, when I send a msg with postfix it uses the wrong domain, is there a way to change this?
<1> for example, in lilo type "linux irqfixup"
<1> TraKeN: isn't deciding the e-mail address the mail user agent's job?
<2> Ahh, so if im typeing mail bleh@bleh.com from the command line what agent am I probably using?
<2> :>
<3> um... mail.
<2> Duh, thanks, just needed a jolt, /etc/mailname handles it well enough... ;)
<3> that will change all email sent from that computer though, you realize?
<3> if its not a mail server that should be probably be OK though.
<4> hm is mkswap supposed to take so long? \o/
<3> Tsunami: nah it should be very quick
<1> you can force postfix to append specific domain to all domainless mail leaving fromy our machine, but as the postifix's documentation states, it's MUA's job :)
<1> Tsunami: mkswapping the root partition? :)
<4> lol no
<4> it's stops after the msg that it truncated the swap partition
<2> K, thanks folks...
<1> Tsunami: you exceeded the 2 gigabyte limit?
<4> yep, 2,5 times \o/
<4> crap :p
<1> you can hack around it by modifying the kernel, but I just can't remember where the hard limit was set
<4> ah, it continued, finally
<3> there is no 2GB limit on swapfs that i know of
<3> i make 4GB swap partitions all the time
<1> atleast there used to be, I remember running into it long ago
<1> and the swapfile limit is still there in i386, I think
<3> ah
<5> oh
<3> ee
<5> ii
<3> you germans are wacky
<3> ;)
<1> germans rule.
<5> love u too denkieboy ;)
<0> argh this is getting frustrating
<0> anyone else an idea what's causing this: http://pastebin.ca/125148
<0> it works for about 300MB then gives this error when i'm trying a filetransfer over my us robotics r8169 card
<0> i'm using the drivers supplied by the accompanied cd
<6> that looks like a hardware issue with your disk
<1> disk?
<7> disk is, like, that which stores Debian, its packages, your resume, and other junk. ;)
<1> it seems to choke on the NIC's interrupt
<0> i'm writing on my new 320gig WD so i hope it's not the disk :
<0> :)
<0> was hoping to make a linux backup server with 320gig to start with in addition to the 500gig i already have
<0> i have a wlan on it too, but that's too slow so i thought gigabit would be fun
<1> did you try the ircfixup parameter?
<1> .. argh, irq :)
<1> too much IRCing :)
<0> yeah i did, didn't help
<0> i tried ircpoll too i read somewhere about it, didn't help either
<1> okay
<1> those were my best ideas :-/
<1> is it a PCI card?
<0> yeah
<0> i did a kernel recompile tho and included support for 8169 into my kernel
<1> try moving it into another slot if you can, that'll change the IRQ
<1> oh, is the IRQ 9 shared?
<0> no it isn't
<1> ok
<0> i'll try changing pci slot
<0> hmm same, once again irc 9 being disabled
<1> then I'm outta ideas, sorry :(
<0> what is that CPU0 when you do cat /proc/interrupts?
<1> if you have more than one CPU, it'll show their interrupts there aswell
<1> you'll have another column for CPU1 and so forth
<0> the number with irq9 is 100.000
<0> it seems like a lot compared to the rest
<1> no, it's just been active lately
<0> ah k, another thing learned
<1> http://pastebin.ca/125254 - here's how the interrupts-file looks during normal run
<1> it's after 30 days of uptime
<0> thing with that nic is that when i do ifconfig eth0 down... ifconfig eth0 up it works again
<0> as long as my filetransfers remain under 270MB all is fine
<1> does it seem to be related to specific file, or just the amount of data transferred?
<1> what happens if you for example stream something for 270 megabytes?
<0> amount of data
<0> Transferred: * 232,58 MB in 10,61 seconds (22.446,7 KB/s)
<0> then after 59MB it stalls
<0> and my console gives me the nobody cared irq error
<1> shareware drivers :)
<1> "please register for unlimited transfer"
<0> lol
<0> i'll sue them for it if it's true :p
<0> sadly i'm not american so it's not that easy to sue :p
<8> har har
<1> .. which reminds me, back when the SCO case was hot, I drew this: http://iccl.fi/read.cgi?id=174
<0> imagine that :O
<9> good evening basta^H^H^H^H^H people.
<0> lo
<0> i'll be damned
<9> yes, you will
<9> I know jesus, he let me in on a few secrets
<9> your damnation beeing one of them
<0> i had all this problems transfering files over my network with proftpd
<10> but dont worry its nice there this time of year
<0> and now i use samba to transfer files and it works wtf is that about :s
<9> err, what kinda problems ? or did you allready mention them before I got here ?
<0> yeah let me paste you an url
<0> http://pastebin.ca/125148
<0> ah damn even with samba it failed now
<0> the error log is a bit shorter now tho
<9> what do you have on irq 9 ?
<0> my new gigabit nic
<9> hmm
<9> what driver/module do you use for that?
<0> http://pastebin.ca/125309 this is the error log when using samba as file transfer
<9> Ronin`: how does it feel to be restless|'s computer, anyway?
<0> i used the drivers that were included on a cd with the USR
<9> ok
<9> which kernel is that ?
<0> 2.6.8-4
<9> hmm, right
<0> compiled it myself using: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?t=206992
<9> isn't rtl8169 included in the vanilla kernel ?
<0> yeah that's the thing i compiled that kernel with 8169 included
<0> but it's still using my own compiled drivers instead of the kernel
<9> yeah, that sounds like problems
<9> if I was you, I would get a haricut, then do a normal vanilla kernel and (re)move the "custom" driver you're using.
<0> what exactly do you mean with vanilla kernel? the one that's being delivered by default?
<11> if you were him, you would probably feel somewhat schizophrenic
<0> if he was me he'd be getting a headache, been at this for a day now..
<9> restless|: vanilla kernel is an other word for a "clean" kernel, usually from kernel.org or a mirror :)
<0> not one that is delivered by debian themselves?
<9> well, other debian-people might disagree, but I prefer just getting the newest available when I compile kernels by hand, and then you pretty much have to use a vanilla kernel
<9> nagual: sure, but schizophrenia has never really bothered me
<9> it keeps me company when I'm bored
<11> Kristian: the trich with being schizo is just to be able to take out the person most appropriate at the time
<11> speaking of haircut
<11> check the notice
<0> i'm already almost baldheaded btw
<9> haha, smooth
<9> literally
<0> Kristian can i still install the new kernel "the debian way"? using kpkg etc?
<1> yes, use kernel-package
<11> yea, im also almost bold
<11> smooth :)
<9> I need to get a haircut actually
<0> i have very frizzly hair so it's best to keep it as short as possible
<0> going for linux-2.6.16.9.tar.gz then.. let's see how he reacts
<9> there is a 2.6.17.8
<0> ok dl that one then
<0> in a min i'll have 3 kernels installed then
<9> hehe
<11> thats ok, i have around 20 or so
<0> 2.6.8-2, 2.6.8-4 and then the new one
<1> I just keep the 2 most recent
Return to
#debian
or
Go to some related
logs:
#beginner
#nhl
morrowind time attack
#politics
#slackware
#openbsd
servermgr_dns + Bad zone file
#politics
#beginner
#red
|
|