| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Comments:
<0> edit /etc/network/interfaces with them both down and swap eth0 for eth1
<0> reup and done
<1> Skiz: sometimes that is not possible (IP--MAC correlation)
<2> the blonde leading the blonde.....
<0> Ouroboros, well afaik it fixes the 2.4 to 2.6 issues with nics
<3> I thought it was blind, awol ? ;)
<0> anything beyond that is beyond me
<1> Skiz: it doesnt re***ing the eth names... you are just changing what the names mean
<1> Skiz: that also means you have to change other configuration files which may use those names
<2> Napta: blind blondes?
<1> but yeah, that is a solution
<3> ehehe
<1> so anyway, where might i get a debian-patched 2.6.17 kernel source?
<4> anonyone can point me to a howto so set up 2 or more ethX one one nic?
<4> so one nic can run seviral subnets?
<4> if u follow?
<1> meglaw: you juse use ethX:Y in /etc/network/interfaces
<4> my googlefu
<3> ok people,
<3> hands up who has been using ubuntu or gentoo in the last 48hrs ?
<3> This is like a police alcohol test
<1> meglaw: keep in mind that these virtual NICs are not fully independent
<3> it inpairs your judgement and ability to google simple things
<4> Ouroboros: speed is the less of my concerns. u wanna dcc a example?
<1> not just speed, and no
<1> instead of 'ifconfig eth0' you use 'ifconfig eth0:0'
<1> everything else is the same
<3> how fast is your link, meglaw
<4> Napta: i use knoppix to wardrive, does that count?
<0> Ouroboros, yes I know that but if you are configuring several interfaces and dealing with iptables and such directly you should be aware of the issues and be able to take responsibility for what you are doing, etc etc and know what you are doing. as I understand what you are saying I'm just giving the 'idiots guide to 2.6 migration issues' quickie ;)
<1> whew
<4> Napta: lan, 100/100, and from there to WAN, 8/1
<1> Skiz: should i even read that? seems like hard work :)
<0> just the last sentence =)
<1> Skiz: yeah, i agree with you, but i found this method was not desirable for me
<3> uber
<3> yes war driving counts!
<0> as it was for me in a few places.
<1> Skiz: i think the best method is the one where you can specify explicitly what NIC comes up with what name.. forget what that is called
<0> mmm war driving with a PSP
<0> lol
<3> i have that beat
<0> treo with a wifi sdcard adapter?///
<3> I have a zyxel usb 802.11b/g/a bluetooth dongle that also is a wifi scanner with an LCD
<3> mwahaha
<0> mmm yum
<3> never picked up any a networks yet though :(
<1> lol
<0> yeah but some guy at a bus stop with a psp you arent going to look 2x at
<3> did I say bluetooth dongle.. err, meant wifi dongle
<3> sure ya are
<0> yet hes bruting your wifi
<3> to rob him
<3> grown man with a psp looks retarded at a bus stop
<0> hrmm true...
<3> holding it up to his face lol
<0> I drive around with it running sometimes
<4> Ouroboros: , seems to be working, now only to set up iptables. :)
<1> iptables dont use that syntax
<1> thats one of the non-independent aspects of it
<4> what do you mean
<1> iptables thinks that eth0 and eth0:* are all the same interface
<1> (which it is)
<5> virtual nics!
<1> usually it is preferrable to just get 2 real NICs
<5> many problems with that
<0> mmm wtf0:99
<5> Ouroboros: yeah, but sometimes that isn't ideal
<5> I have a box that has two nics and 10-20 ip's
<1> heh
<5> for vhosting
<5> I guess a couple quad cards would do the trick
<1> i have a box that has > 64 NICs and 1 IP
<5> 64 nics?
<0> root dns server?
<1> well they are not really NICs, but they show up as real interfaces
<0> hahaha
<5> I was going to say
<1> they are actually point-to-point channels
<0> I'd think it would be 64 servers and 1 ip
<3> I have a root DNS server
<3> and it doesn't have 64 nics
<3> lol
<0> Napta, yes we know ;)
<5> the most I've seen on a node in the data center is 6 pci slots with a quad card in each
<5> for a kick/jumpstart server
<4> so what your saying is the entire GNU comunity still has not made it possible to run a gateway one on nic?
<0> btw Napta I have this strange sore on my penis, want to talk about it in PM?
<5> haha
<0> wait does this mean sid is supported now?
<3> haha
<0> 8)
<1> meglaw: it is possible, but just know that all traffic may be seen everywhere
<3> Skiz: you have a psp right ?
<3> how do you rate divx playback
<3> if you do that at all
<0> yeah a 1.5fw
<3> nice
<5> choppy vs. not
<0> dunno I know the lcds are slower on the older ones
<0> never did much video watchin on em
<0> about the same as a treo imo
<3> gah, im trying to find a decent 'media' player to play dvds on the train/plane (dvds = avi movies)
<1> heh
<3> I dont' want to drag my ibook around, as I have to worry about damaging it
<6> What's wrong with mplayer?
<6> :P
<3> well, I can't carry mplayer around on the train
<0> Bodach, port it plz
<4> Ouroboros:, inside my lan or what?
<5> Napta: i wouldn't worry about an ibook
<3> as it's software
<3> souljah!
<5> I dont' think anyone worries about mac's
<5> ;)
<3> my ibook is like
<3> my second girlfriend
<5> pron?
<6> hrm that's sad
<3> or my first
<3> one of them
<0> damn it I'm going to buy a pro 2 duo by next week
<0> thats it
<3> when my ibook g4 does..
<0> core 2 duo*
<3> s/does/dies
<3> Im going to buy ANOTHER g4
<3> mwahaha
<5> I have a t60 that has the duo
<1> meglaw: well if your private network and the public uplink are on the same NIC, then each subnet may see traffic from the other one ocasionally (***uming a switch)
<5> bloody windows whores it out
<5> not to mention software encryption software
<5> :(
<0> going for the 17" but people sat they like the 15
<3> software encryption software? hehe
<0> or 13 or whatever the 1 down is.
<3> macbook is 13
<0> 17 is a bit big but why even have a desk?
<3> pro is 15 and 17
<3> 15 is way too big for me. 12/13
<5> Napta: it encrypts the entire hd and decrypts it for use when necessary
<0> hot lap? heh
<5> as you imagine i/o blows
<3> ah
<5> not to mention waste of battery
<3> I encrypt my home dir on my macbook (AES) and I don't even notice the overhead, which is nifty
<0> the _whole_ hdd?
<5> yup
<1> hm, so you cant get old versions of packages from apt-get?
<0> a loopback encryption supported by the kernel has that much overhead?
Return to
#debian
or
Go to some related
logs:
#politics
#politics
#mirc
#nhl
#politics
#beginner
#nhl
#beginner
#cph
#beginner
|
|