| |
| |
| |
|
Comments:
<0> Anybody home that might help me with a quick C# question?
<0> 22 Connected, 22 Asleep? :(
<1> conspiring to conquer the world
<0> Oh good
<0> Might you be able to help me?
<0> I have an object that I've instanced within Main()
<0> Main() calls out to another function called Create(), which in turns calls out a third function called Define()
<0> Inside of Define, I am trying to do OBJECT.Function = Blah and it tells me that OBJECT could not be found
<0> No typos, and all constructors and acessors / mutators are public
<1> um
<1> and OBJECT is what?
<0> A defined cl*** within another namespace
<0> I've got the namespace attached with using at the top
<1> hm
<1> its not part of another ***embly that needs to be added as a reference?
<1> i guess the use clause would fail then
<0> I don't think so.. But I've never used ***emblys and references like that.. The namespace in which OBJECT is defined is in another .cs file
<0> If I try to do OBJECT.Function = Blah within Main() it works just fine
<0> But in this static void subroutine, it tells me OBJECT cannot be found
<1> well obviously from a static method you would only be able to access static vars and methods.. is OBJECT static?
<1> even in wherever it is
<1> or is it a variable you p*** on to that method?
<0> OBJECT is only defined as "cl*** OBJECT"
<0> i.e. cl*** OBJECT { constructor(){} }
<1> oh right. it's a cl***.
<1> im tired :p
<0> No worries, so am I =)
<0> public constructor(){} as well, by the way
<1> but um..
<1> this thing you're trying to ***ign something to, is it a property ?
<0> Yes
<1> a static one?
<0> public string FName { get {} set{} }
<0> So OBJECT.FName = "Blah"; should work
<0> I thought
<0> And it does, if I do the OBJECT.FName = "Blah"; from inside of Main() just not out in this external method
<1> uh no you'd have to instantiate the cl*** first
<0> It is, within Main()
<0> Player PLAYER = new Player(); To be exact
<1> but then you'd have to do (the instance of OBJECT).FName = whatever
<0> So PLAYER.FName = "Blah"; should work, it just doesn't see PLAYER outside of Main() and that's the bugger part that I'm confused on
<1> right so PLAYER is an instance of Player
<0> Yes
<1> right then.
<1> [NoV]Pops> OBJECT is only defined as "cl*** OBJECT"
<1> 00:37 < [NoV]Pops> i.e. cl*** OBJECT { constructor(){} }
<1> .. confused me :P
<1> there you said it was the cl*** itself
<0> Sorry, was trying to use general terms rather then the Specific ones.. Looks like I added more confusion the needed
<1> usually that happens yes :P
<0> So technically, I have cl*** Player { Player(){} }
<0> With the constructor being Public
<1> ok well as long as you have the correct use clauses and p*** on the instance it should work
<1> i cant see any other reason
<0> Is use a keyword I'm not aware of?
<0> I thought that once an Object was instanced it sort of existed for all to see and manipulate depending on the acess levels of it's various accessors and mutators?
<1> it's not global, of course
<1> if that's what you mean
<1> you'd have to p*** it on through to the methods that need it
<1> OR; create a static cl*** that you can stuff it into :P
<1> i guess thats the only way of doing globals in c#
<1> or can you have static vars hm. i dont remember :P
<0> So static cl*** Player ?
<1> no i mean like
<0> Doesn't that not allow me to Player.FName = "Whatever";?
<1> static Player PLAYER = new Player();
<1> but im not sure if that's allowed. can't remember atm
<0> Ah.. Let me give that a go
<1> but that's really bad design if you ask me
<1> you should p*** the variables you need on through the parameters to your functions
<0> static Player PLAYER didn't work, errored out
<1> unless there's something i'm not following in how you're doing stuff
<0> How do I p*** my instance through to my functions?
<1> well, like you'd do with any variables
<1> public returntype methodname(variabletype variablename) .. etc
<0> In my function signatures I'd need a definition to catch it with.. i.e. like int b; Would I be able to do object P;?
<0> I guess that would make sense.. Let me see if that works or not
<1> you can do Create(Player P, int 4, object o) etc for all i care
<1> er 4 not allowed but some naem heh
<1> then just p*** on the P reference furhter
<1> or PLAYER if you want
<1> i find uppercase is messy
<1> use camel notation .p
<1> pascal notation for cl***es and properties
<0> Ya, I do with normal variable names
<1> camel notation for variables/instqnaces
<1> i havent quite agreed with myself on _varname vs m_varName yet :P
<1> for private data
<0> P.FName 'object' does not contain a definition for FName
<1> yes you're treating it as an boject
<1> object
<1> you have object P ?
<1> you'd either have to use Player P or (Player)P.FName
<0> Right, just did the Player P (Caught my own mistake before I came back to this wonidow ;) )
<0> Now it's giving me an Inconsistant Acessability. Says N.Player is less acessable then the method
<0> So it's a matter of figuring out Public and such correctly I think...
<0> You've definately got me on the right track... Let me see what the Dynamic help has to offer on this
<1> hm
<0> Ah ha!
<0> that got it
<0> cl*** Player is now defined at public cl*** Player
<0> And that got me past those
<1> ah yes
<0> I thought cl*** was public by default?
<1> easy to forget
<1> apparently not :)
<0> Heh
<0> Thanks for the nudge in the right direction
<0> Much appriciated
<1> keeping track of default visibility when switching between c++, java, c# and delphi is a mess
<1> and how visiblity works in general hehe
<1> e.g. friend (c++), same unit (delphi), private internal (c#), and whatever java has :P
<1> anyhow. good luck .p
<0> Thanks again..
<2> whow ants to help with my xml problems? :)
<3> how can i write hello world
<1> hello world
<3> yes
<1> i just did
<1> System.Console.Write..something("Hello, World");
<3> okay i'll try
<3> thx
<3> cool works
Return to
#csharp
or
Go to some related
logs:
#stocks
robocopy long pathname
#computers
#ubuntu
blk_jack
#microsoft
#gentoo
#unixhelp
#unixhelp
#italy
|
|