| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Comments:
<0> I use the them both for PS/Bridge
<1> i had a dream about smithfield one time
<1> i was walking and on this bridge over a creek
<1> it was in big letters
<1> "smithfield"
<2> The 805 uses a different revision of the Smithfield.
<0> Either way... I think AMD has lost my faith atm... least my wallet.
<3> the whole am2 thing was useless.
<0> Releasing ****ty AM2 garbage, upping the cost of their Buggy *** NF-4 mobo's...bah
<3> its stopgap.
<0> yep
<0> AM2 is garbage.
<0> Atm
<0> They'd better hope that in 07, their 65nm fabs go flawless... or they'll be losing MAJOR revenues trying to catch up to wintel
<0> Opteron is the only thing saving them: for servers that is.
<0> Even those chips are overpriced
<4> AMD is garbage, period.
<1> yes
<1> amd is terrible
<1> :(
<1> LoSeR
<0> Well up until core2Duo AMD was still the better value
<0> Things have changed huh...
<4> but was still garbage
<0> Compared to?
<4> that's why I haven't upgraded since my old P4 2.8 GHz
<0> X2's dominate all but the P4 EE's
<2> Not really
<2> Do you want to see some benchmarks?
<0> And the opterons are better than all the P4's period.
<4> Intel is to AMD like an Audi A4 1.8 is to a Mazda 3
<0> I don't need to see some, I've seen a whole ot of them
<0> Lmfao
<4> ok the Mazda 3 is 2.3 lts, etc
<4> but come on you're driving an AUDI
<0> Those cars aren't even in the same league
<0> Not even based on interiors
<4> ok an Audi A4 2.0 version to a Mazda 6 maybe
<4> the Mazda has bigger engine
<0> Still not even close dude.
<4> but it still ****s
<5> (CPU 1) Intel Celeron CPU 2.93GHz (Socket 478) @ 3014MHz (133MHz FSB), 2% load
<0> ircN[moo] [cpu: 2-Intel Pentium 4, 2992MHz, 0KB (6% Load)]
<5> say the full specs of ur frocessor
<5> proscessor
<0> that's all it says
<0> Doesn't list anymore
<5> type /sysinfo
<5> (Operating system) Microsoft Windows XP Professional (SP2), version 5.1.2600 (43 processes running, 153.23MB free RAM, installed 10w 3h 59m 10s ago, 58m 13s uptime, 5d 16h 28m 46s uptime record)
<5> i can give u my computer info
<3> you're all idiots for arguing over "which is better" as a blanket statement. Better is relative to what your uses are and what architectures are out at the time.
<5> im happy with intel and ive used AMD both r good
<3> a core 2 will probably be my next build, but depending on when that is, ill see what amd has available.
<5> both Intel and AMD r good
<5> to me though AMD ****s for gaming
<2> I'm only refuting the claim that X2's always outperform Pentium D's.
<0> meelk= I was trolling, damn you HAD to out it?!
<5> hey if i get a 3.4 GHZ dual core Intel wouldnt it actually run and 6.8GHZ
<5> since its dual core
<5> someone answer my question
<6> what makes you think that ?
<6> it just means it runs faster
<6> i mean
<6> it just means its wideer
<6> NOT Faster
<6> JUST WIDER!!!!!
<7> no
<6> YES
<7> well yes
<6> newb
<7> but no
<6> yes newb
<7> yes it runs wider
<6> thank you
<7> i was saying no to Robert_we
<6> oh ok
<5> well my mom has a Dual core Athalon 4200+ ant its clocked at 2.2GHZ it runs at 4.4GHZ
<7> no
<7> it runs at 2.2ghz
<7> but it's two cores running at that speed
<6> bandwidth Robert_we newb
<5> its technicly 2 times as fast
<5> but its not
<6> dude..
<6> listen
<6> 2.8 single core vs 2.2 duel core... who will win?
<8> http://www.local6.com/news/9717727/detail.html
<8> ROFL
<3> just face stab him and feel better.
<6> idiot, 2.8 single is faster than 2.2 duel
<7> Compiling code, the single core will win
<6> dUal even
<6> 2.2 is wider than 2.8
<7> single-threaded apps and OSes will be faster under a single core processor at twice the speed
<6> its about STABILITY Over speedility
<3> speedility?
<5> i like speed
<6> Stability vs Speedility
<3> rofl
<6> doh
<7> you were so close
<7> and then you said "Speedility"
<6> well then you're going to crash faster
<3> I've got to remember speedility. I'm going to use that on someone tonight, wait and see.
<6> i mean crash harder
<6> Speedility (tm)
<7> basically, in a modern OS instead of cramming a bunch of processes into one thread, dual core procs allow for cramming a bunch of processes into multiple threads.
<3> "with Blast Processing Speedility!"
<7> comprende?
<5> ok
<7> another way to look at it is like this:
<7> you're filling up your bathtub, would it be faster to fill it up with one faucet, or two?
<5> 2
<7> if the source of the water is different, yes :)
<0> <8> http://www.local6.com/news/9717727/detail.html HAHA ultimate PWnage.
<0> Coulda KILLed someone, heh
<7> (what a horrible analogy)
<9> hi, i keep getting banned from #help and a few other channels because i have some sort of "suspicious" script running
<9> i ran a virus scanner and it found nothing
<9> i had a trojan a few days ago, but got rid of it
<9> what can i do?
<5> remove the script
<7> upgrade to mirc 6.2
<2> Does a Linux/Unix system have to be configured for SMP to utilize the second core?
<7> or use a different irc client.
<9> ill try uninstalling i guess
<9> comcast shut my emial down because the trojan i had was sending out emails to people
<0> fug that... if I got one of those goon trojans and ****, I'd pack up and just pop in the fresh Ghost image or sys-restore... who KNOWs what kind of ports and backdoors it could have opened that virus scanners do NOT fix after the fact.
<7> yeah, well your virus scanner probably didn't get rid of all of the trojan
<7> what do you use?
<9> mcaffe
<10> cap
<10> MCGAYFEE
<0> HAHA
<0> That **** is garbage
<10> mcCANUCKED
<7> McCrappy
<10> mcCANUCKED
<10> mcCANUCKED-
<10> mcCANUCKED--
<7> get rid of that
<0> Trend Micro is supposed to be the top atm
<10> avast, avg
<0> Trend, Nod, Kav
<7> Trend Micro is good
<10> or get that ubcd for windows
<7> avast and avg are awesome for free
Return to
#computers
or
Go to some related
logs:
irab news
gabrieal koran
raid 11 adapter
#computers
duplicate flashscript
#computers
#freebsd
LIKE Bodega Sans
#politics
#microsoft
|
|