| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Comments:
<0> some one give me a network cable how to?
<1> there is a Intel Core Duo at $1200
<1> on newegg
<0> thats works:P
<2> yeah
<1> hey
<3> my laptops are a 3200+ and a 3500+
<0> just for a basic strait threw cable
<0> :p
<0> cause I'm ****ing confused right now
<1> I've checked out H.264 accell on my brothers x1600 Pro, and CPU ussage is %7
<2> A Turion64 at 2.0 gig is a blazer
<1> on my system it's %100
<1> now
<1> I've found a new nvidia driver and Inter Video DVD 7 and CPU ussage went down to %30
<2> Dual cpu opteron?
<1> so
<1> single core
<1> so
<1> nvidia is working on H.264 accell
<1> you know
<3> my next cpu purchase is going to be a FX
<1> FX=waste of money
<1> my next CPU
<1> opteron 165
<1> ~$300
<2> fx are a waste
<1> will OC to 2.6~2.8
<3> I can do that now
<1> opteron 165 is dual core
<1> same as FX60
<2> amd new AM2 will run at clock speeds of 2.6-2.8
<1> for 1/4 price
<3> my 3500+ runs at that
<2> I won't not bother with dual core this year
<2> honestly
<1> true
<1> not enough software
<1> I will use Linux for video encoding
<1> much better threading engine
<1> than Windows
<2> and amd plans to have quad-core next year
<1> that will kill Intel
<1> Intels dual core 9xx are worthless
<2> true
<1> I've worked on a HP media center PC
<2> dual core has been out for a while now
<2> how much of a impact has it done
<2> very little
<2> why I say not worth upgrading to dual core
<1> Dual Core =! Dual CPU
<0> flammingo isn't flyback right?
<2> if you want to spend money on a cheap dual core when prices drop then upgrade 6-7 months later
<1> it's a little better than HT
<2> then by all means
<1> I will buy a AM2
<1> when they come out
<1> and been out for a while
<1> so I can OC
<2> yeah
<2> well summer they will come out
<1> I bet that 1st wave of AM2 won't be good OC'ers
<2> so then you gotta give time
<2> I'd say fall possible
<1> maybe, just maybe if I find a used opteron 165 CABYE
<2> for the truth to be out
<1> they OC to 3.0 Ghz
<2> on them
<1> that would be faster than FX60
<3> I dont oc, that is why I am going the fx route
<1> but still
<2> amd has a edge
<3> but you can shove a 3500+ to 2.6 easily
<2> even with half a meg of cache there still efficent chips
<1> on AMD more cache = Better Multi Tasking
<1> I got a sempron oced @ 2.31 (Sempron 64) and encodes videos faster than a P4 @ 3.0
<1> L2: 128 KB
<1> ****ty multitasker do
<2> intel lags behind
<2> I guess we wait and see what am2 will be like in a while
<1> why is Inetel so sloppy?
<2> and as for dual core IMO not worth it
<2> Like what I read if you got a fast single core chip and get a dual core you may not even notice if at all any difference
<2> like marcm like you or I for example
<1> why didn't Apple go to AMD for their new platform?
<2> Intel has the strenght
<1> they use Intel Core Duo, which, the fastest Core Duo is slower than the slowest AMD X2 (3800)
<2> even at trade shows
<1> look up anandtech tests, Core Duo vs X2
<2> AMD still is not in the show
<2> they had out pamplets outside
<3> price in volume and ***ured production
<2> Intel got booths the whole works
<1> hehe
<2> Intels Core Duo for notebooks or desktops
<2> just stinks
<1> AMD has better volume pricing
<1> more so
<1> has 27 FABS
<2> get a Turion64 for laptop and it will out preform a Intel Core duo
<3> 27 fabs?
<2> hands down
<3> where?
<1> worldwide
<3> where?
<1> 2 In Germany
<1> Couple in USA
<1> South America
<1> Europe
<3> dresden and texas
<1> Japan I believe
<1> A chip that needs to comunicate with itself over another chip (Intel Dual Core) is retarded
<2> when I saw PentiumD it was new
<2> over getting AMD
<2> I knew I made the right choice by not buying a PentiumD
<2> and we all can agree on this
<2> or most of us
<3> they have 3 fabs
<1> a Pentium D and a Core Duo needs to talk to the North Bridge and then back to itself
<3> dresden has 2 and austin texas has one
<1> how stupid is that?
<2> true
<1> look on AMD web site
<1> they claim 27
<2> Why I said get a fast AMD single core
<3> no, no, no
<3> that is the fab names
<2> and still faster then Intel
<3> that has nothing to do with the places
<3> fab in austin is fab 25
<2> what kind of balony is that
<3> germany is 30 the other is 35
<2> you gota dual core chip
<2> and the competitor single core is still faster
<2> sometimes intel one of it's cpu
<2> "sleeps"
<2> the other one wakes it up (so to speak)
<4> Hello evil ones.
<2> now if your tired and someone tells you in 10 seconds after you woke up to lift 50ib weight
<3> and yes, I would say they had alot of fabs total, but not fabs making proccessors
<2> could you do it
<2> odds are no
<3> they make a ****LOAD of more things that processors
<3> embedded controllers, flash ram, DSP's
<1> true
<3> processors they just have 3
<3> and intel has WAY more than that
<2> how intel dual core kind works
<1> chances are that the ECM module in your car is Int3l powered
<1> if it's a GM
<3> nope :)
Return to
#computers
or
Go to some related
logs:
ibm volcer
#windows
#politics
harbor freight milling machine
site:www.quotesdb.info thabondgirl
#linuxhelp
#gentoo
#computers
#heroin
my webcamXP server
|
|