| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Comments:
<0> jk's
<1> :P
<2> lol nosun
<0> ok I'll cut the queerness now;P
<0> hopefully;P
<1> heh
<0> hows stuff with both of you
<0> me I'm just slobbering looking at pictures of SG 750gb
<3> gimme link
<0> no link
<2> link pls
<0> its just random stuff;P
<0> http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,125556-page,1/article.html
<0> one anyway
<0> http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,1959264,00.asp
<0> as is I got 2 comps with Barracuda 7200.10 but their both 320gb's:P
<0> 1 is sata and the other is ide
<0> I might get another 320gb
<0> or something
<0> wonder how tiny a perpendicular 1gb could be:P
<0> like a tiny hair that the head moves across a stripe and nothing else;P
<0> doesn't even need a spinning platter:P
<4> It is cheaper buying 320 GB drives than 750 GB ones
<0> yes is why I got some dozen 320's
<0> though I bought only 2 for myself:P
<0> 320's are nicest price to me:P
<4> 750 GB harddrives = 400 bucks
<0> mind ya they gone up in price here
<4> 320 GB hardrives = $90
<0> here costs 133$
<0> locally
<4> Still not bad.
<0> canadian currency mind ya:P
<0> ones I bought were 127$
<0> or something
<4> EVen if the 750 GB harddrives were around for $300 its still not worth it
<5> ya
<4> Since that is nothing compared to 3x320 GB :P
<5> when 750GB dies..
<5> bad
<4> I don't think they die that easily.
<5> hah
<5> nice optimism
<6> sup takuma
<0> I don't think either
<5> i'm a realest =\
<4> Heck, my 250 GB harddrives has been around for over 2 years and still running
<0> these last SG's seem pretty solid
<4> The only harddrive sthat have died on my are Maxtors.
<5> wd goes through phases of good drives
<6> drives should last that long
<0> reminds me of the good old days:P
<5> so does maxtor
<6> i have a 40gig from like '95
<6> and still works damn gr8
<5> ive got still living 40g's, but less than a year old 250gs dieing
<4> ouch.
<0> I actually lately aquired some 4-5 drives from 95 era:P
<4> What 250 GB?
<5> wd
<0> give sec
<5> ive had both my raptors die
<0> all small drives
<0> though
<5> 36g
<4> WD is very varied when it comes to quality
<0> biggest is the 40gb
<4> Some of their drives can be kick ***
<4> While others can be worse than a DethStar
<1> Takuma, what's the name of that song?
<5> afk, being called to help
<4> Raffika: Don't try looking for a TAB. There is none.
<0> Barracuda 7200.10 I can say is definitly kick ***:D
<4> Raffika: I wouldn't ask you to transcribe it if there was a TAB for it :P
<1> I'm not looking for a tab.
<1> lol
<1> I like the intro.
<4> How's the progress?
<1> Not too much. But, it's coming.
<4> You got one chord yet?
<4> I think I've taken out some parts of it.
<4> Though it doesn't sound 100% correct
<0> these are the drives I got in the last month or so
<1> I have it writen down somewhere.
<4> Gimme
<0> from upgrading old drives;P
<4> Tell me what you've discovered
<1> I gota look.
<0> smallest to biggest
<7> will a processor have its socket # written on it?
<5> ya
<5> ive had dozens of drives die
<5> usually due to psu problems.. but bout 30% dead drives
<5> crashed heads
<2> do you like scsi hdds for gaming?
<5> uhh
<0> Seagate 6.4gb Medalist ST36423A, I think this one Fujitsu 15gb, 20gb Maxtor 91366U4, and Maxtor D740X-6L 40gb
<5> what does that even mean ?
<5> scsi is scsi is scsi
<0> all pata/ide
<2> are they more practical than raptors?
<5> raptors are outdated technology
<5> compared to sata II
<5> when they actually have drives that can fully support the bandwidth
<7> it says 2.4ghz/512/533 on my processor
<7> is 512 the socket #?
<5> they are loud too, but they are cheaper than scsi
<0> I bet 2x Barracuda 7200.10's in raid1
<0> would kick the **** out of 1 raptor;P
<5> i've got 4G scsi drives still working though
<2> k
<5> scsi lasts forever
<5> nosun: uhh
<5> 2 raptors in a raid0 will kill those
<0> hence why I think SG should make something that compairable;P
<5> unless those are sata ii
<0> not the point though:P
<5> is there one?
<4> SCSI 320 is unfourtunently excessively expensive.
<0> ok give sec
<2> im thinking a couple raided scsi drives ftw
<4> Hence the reason why Raptors exist
<5> Takuma: ya but such a warm fuzzy feeling from them
<0> what I'm saying is overall SG's are better:P
<5> i'd really like to go scsi for my home systems
<2> the maxtor atlas looks affordable
<4> And SCSI 320 ruyn ****ing HOT
<4> And NOISY
<5> i just can't afford the space I need
<4> No sane person would have those
<5> or can't justify it anyway
<4> Unless for server purposes
<0> phisher1 I agree
<0> I can't aford 100tb's either
<0> ;)
<2> ololol
<5> ya uh.. 100tb is alot
<5> i don't need a san at home
<4> And I doubt the raptors durability
<5> wouldn't mind one though
<0> me I'm not picky 100 is a small number
<4> I don't think they survive as long as Seagate Barracude 7200.10
<5> Takuma: the last ones went through a few moves
<0> big enough for me:P
<5> hdds don't like being bounced around heh
<4> Hence why I really don't feel confortable buying one.
<5> they've done me well
<5> only 1 of them actually fully died
<4> And to be honest
<5> the other was starting to whine, so I rma'd it too
Return to
#computers
or
Go to some related
logs:
#computers
#computers
#freebsd
gay sergio ramos
#worldcup
poohdevil
crystal reports error converting nvarchar to datetime
easdropping
warmeetings
t
|
|