| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Comments:
<0> http://youtube.com/watch?v=xl0c8lOpdHY
<1> wht is it
<0> pron
<0> hardcore
<0> no its a mac vs pc type comercial
<2> which side does it take
<0> mac
<0> its actually vista vs pc
<0> vista vs mac rather
<3> hah
<4> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48iAY5jsUC0
<4> that can't be 18
<3> I don't know, she might be
<5> well ***uming she got her tattoo legally
<5> she would be 18
<3> Maybe she had parental consent
<4> ah ok
<4> cause if she's 18
<4> uNF
<3> When did all the attractive girls turn into sluts?
<5> DefiantN: a lot of artists won't even tattoo on under 18 even with consent
<6> just recently i beleive
<3> They only need 1 artist
<4> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ig1KzqC7sc
<4> this was a great anime scene
<7> amime ****s
<3> haha
<8> Can anyone recommend any Windows Software for scanning legal documents and saving as pdf
<7> scanning is one thing, pdf is another
<8> Just a good overall scanning program
<7> high end hp scanners come with an app that was pretty good
<7> forgot the name
<9> http://microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=252581
<9> buy right now or no
<10> omg no
<10> no buy
<10> damn slurpee, why did you have to come online? now i feel like a slurpee
<11> u should be able to get a p4 for that price
<10> man it has 512MB of ram with shared video
<10> and vista on it!
<10> it will be as fast as terry the turtle
<11> ddr2 though
<10> doesnt mean squat
<10> ddr2 is meant for high end overclockers
<3> That's not a P4?
<11> celeron
<10> no
<10> duo
<10> celeron duo
<11> wow - 2 patties in one
<10> garbage x 2
<10> and the fact that it has vista on it makes it even worse
<10> an operating system that demands at least a 128MB video card and 1 gig of system memory
<10> poor equipment and crappy package
<3> vista can be removed
<11> then have no OS for 199
<10> yes but i still want a slurpee
<11> is it true most progs dont use the duo anyway
<12> at the moment that is fairly true
<10> well you can run multiple programs and take advantage of the duo
<12> however, that's not a reason not to get any multicore processor
<10> as far as using one program that takes advantage of both is not common
<10> running multiple program these days is very common
<13> anyone know what this Intel.Fortran.Compiler.v9 does? is for?
<11> i put suse 10.1 (64) on my athlon 64 but didnt notice much diff from 32
<12> google it AMDMan
<10> oicu812: i dont think going 64bit should make a big speed difference
<12> Oicu812: you're not going to see much difference unless the processors are put to extreme tests
<10> the purpose of 64bit to my knowledge is that it's meant to excuate at larger sizes
<10> so if a program is 64bit compatible but meant to operate a 32bit level then it's the same thing
<10> larger memory execution sizes
<12> 64Bit means that that internal registers of the cpu can hold 64bits
<10> desolate, i'm talking about the practically
<12> in the future when there is multiple sets of different data that needs to be pumped through the processor
<12> it will be applicable
<10> in the future but not current
<10> when 64 becomes mainstream like it is in mac, i can see that
<11> is vista 64 bit?
<12> there's 2 different versions
<12> 32 and 64 bit
<13> or Hampson.Russell.CE.v8
<10> 64bit processors currently an ideal concept not a practical concept
<11> i downloaded a 64 bit trial of xp but was told not to try it cuz i'd have to give up my reg lic. and it was crap
<12> Clocker: current applications are only a fraction of what processors should be doing
<10> it really depends on what apps you're referring to and in what respect you're talking about
<10> you've never seen a processing cpu gauge meter go to 100%?
<12> all aspects
<10> i've seen it many times
<10> in fact, it does it when you load up and the program attempts to inialize from a non memory state
<12> lol
<12> think outside the box Clocker
<10> what do you mean by that?
<12> you sounds like an intel spokesperson
<12> sound*
<14> Then explain yourself, Desolate
<10> no desolate, i am realistic
<10> faster cpu means faster load times
<10> however when an application has launched, it will not max the cpu in doing functions
<10> because it is now memory resident
<12> Processors have the potential to do so much more than they are currently doing, someone just needs to build the systems
<12> and when that time comes, larger registers will be needed
<11> i remember waiting 26 mins for my hazzard run game to load of off tape drive
<11> i dont mind 10 secs now
<10> desolate, you are talking in ideal theory
<10> come back to the real world
<12> so we should appreciate what we got now instead of striving to do better?
<10> why would you say that?
<12> half *** it, so to speak?
<14> Talking about how things are now != not trying to improve
<15> proud americans? :)
<12> because you're talking about 64bit like it won't be needed for another 100 years
<10> thats a bit of a rhetorical question dont you think?
<10> i never said that
<10> you have to a bit ***umptive and not so extreme
<11> it seems to me the pipleine cache is the bottleneck now, no?
<11> y not crank it up?
<10> cache memory is only one factor
<12> any instance where the cpu has to go to memory slows the system down
<12> that's a bottleneck yes
<10> lets look at the basics, heat and economics is the slowing factor
<12> clocker: what are you talking about?
<10> do you think that processor companies want to release the latest and greatest using the most state of the art?
<10> do you think that consumers can afford to pay for that?
<11> yes and noo
<12> things take time to adjust but it will be sooner than you think
<12> clocker: have you ever heard of fusion?
<10> the movement of processors have to related to the fact they are building pcs now for performance / watt?
<10> and why? it's cuz the way they're going, they're burning up the chips
<10> of course i've heard of fusion
<10> but humans are no where near achieving that
<12> would you please expand on what you're saying
<12> are you saying we reached the max clock frequency?
<10> lets examine simple concepts once again not to demean anyone but it's to simply understanding
<3> Is it possible to put a cpu in backwards? without using a hammer?
<10> why would amd and intel the two largest cpu manufacturers change over from a 90nm process to 65nm?
<12> less power
<12> that's a dumb questions.
<12> question*
<10> it's cuz they dont continue going on without the system chips burning
<10> you want faster, u need more circuitry
<11> its possible i saw the smoke
<10> u need to shrink it to reduce the heat
<3> YOu need smaller circuits
<12> clocker: get to the point
<10> that's what is capping cpus today
<11> intel is maaking smaller now eh
<12> Clocker: if you knew what fusion was, you wouldn't be discussing the heat issues
<10> not the cache level
Return to
#computers
or
Go to some related
logs:
emerge coldplug stuck
#gamedev
#red
jared zx11
#windows
#politics
#red
lesson you learn amnesty works you just don't call it amnesty
#windows
#politics
|
|