@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20



Comments:

<0> not really suprised
<0> Rix|Port80: Our slogan is "probably best on IP".
<0> heh
<0> http://www.acsblog.org/ip-and-tech-law-2883-11th-circuit-to-webmasters-telling-someone-to-go-away-doesnt-make-them.html read that?
<1> Surprise! Surprise!
<1> The attack-raiod on The Pirate was issued by none other than the M.:p.AA THEMSELVES
<1> Serveral ministers in the Swedish goverment has been sued for vowing to the M.P.A.A pre***ure on taking down the pirate bay site
<1> This entire thing is a scandal
<1> hahaha. Apparently the LAYWER of thePIrate bay organization and homepage had to leave a urine-sample test before going to court.
<1> ****ing rediculous
<2> Is there someone here that understands cookies? I'm trying to create a proof of concept on how to byp*** them.
<3> they are pretty useful, so its not a good idea to not use them
<2> Nah, i mean... if i'm getting logged on into a box
<2> to make it somehow to byp*** the user or something...
<2> I don't know exactly how to explain what I really want.
<2> I'm trying to be sure that nobody can change the cookies in order to fool a mail system...



<3> you must mean email you read using a browser
<2> yes
<4> best music video ever? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQdp68zsK4I&search=jan%20terri
<4> *snicker*
<3> ask a ninja is funny
<2> does someone know how cookies are being encrypted? is there a way to fake out some cookies?
<5> haha
<5> i read that topic story at the gym the other day
<5> funny ****
<5> hehe
<5> when will ppl learn to support their local, independant technicians, instead of big, multinational corporations
<5> we're cheaper and your hd won't end up in chicago at a garage sale
<5> hehe
<6> rofl
<7> File sharing works like a Hydra, if you cut one head off, two more grows out!
<7> words of wisdom:D
<7> http://piratbyran-in-eng.blogspot.com/ near bottom of page
<7> 2006-05-31
<6> nosun: totally
<6> god that article is stupid
<7> which?
<7> best buy?
<6> pirate byran has no copywrite material! only torrent files, which arn't!
<6> no, the pirate bay one
<7> oh heh
<7> its true:P
<6> no
<6> that doesn't matter
<7> pirate bay have kinda like shortcuts:P
<6> theyre stull actively working to distribute illegal material
<7> disagree
<7> piratebay..... is not a illegal file distributor
<7> its a search engine
<6> I dont think its right for them to shut them down, for other reasons, but its still illegal to distribute them, and thats what theyre doing
<7> if it is guilty so is google
<6> whether or not they have the files on their server, theyre still distributing it
<7> no they're no
<7> not*
<6> no, pirate bay is explicitly used for piracy... google is designed for legitamate material
<6> yes. they are
<7> Idle.... get it strait.... if you submit a website in google that has illegal crap is it googles fault
<7> .....
<7> better yet
<7> if you go to a forum.....
<6> you dont submit a website to google, it crawls there roboticly
<7> and paste your ftp of 0day Warez is it the forums fault?
<7> idle..... then there you go:P
<7> is it google's fault though?
<6> its not the forums fault if you put kiddie porn on the website, but it becomes their fault if the forum is designed for kiddie porn, or fails to remove it in a timely f***ion
<7> who says its designed for warez?
<6> uh, the PIRATE bay
<7> ;)
<6> cmon...
<7> pirate bay to me is designed for files
<8> like linux torrents :-p
<6> bittorrent is designed for files
<7> what about it
<7> I'm a pirate;)
<7> and its got nothing to do with "piracy"



<6> pirate bay is designed for distributing files, which center on illegal files
<7> infact piracy has nothing to do with "piracy"
<7> bah no its not
<6> yes, it is
<8> pirate bay intents to be the biggest tracker...
<7> plain and simple, its for sharing files
<6> nosun: with focus on illegal files
<7> no matter what type are
<8> they don't...
<7> explain me why I can find loads of non copyright crap on there;)
<8> they have no reason to prohibit illegal files...
<6> nosun: explain to me why its so easy to find illegal material on there
<6> Martijn: cept the laws
<8> that's like apple having to allow only drm on their ipod
<7> explain me why it matters?
<7> ;)
<8> what's the difference with apple???
<7> I can find kiddie pron on google probably
<7> not that I'd try
<8> I bet over 50% of all the music on ipods is illegal..
<7> and I bet it wouldn't be hard
<7> if you knew how to;P
<6> Martijn: well over that
<8> compare it to the pirate bay...
<7> and I bet if everyone on google searched up kiddie pron it would infact reflect that
<7> and no matter what you searched it would come up with kiddie pron
<7> get it?;)
<6> the difference is, iPods arn't used to distribute the music
<8> they are used to play illegal music...
<7> sure they are
<7> iPods are totally illegal
<8> so no difference as far as I see...
<7> now thats something that should be all out ban
<7> along with car stereo's
<7> and subwoofers and speakers and even tweeters;)
<7> even earbuds should be in question;)
<8> and plasma tweeters?
<7> each time you listen to a song damn you know how many people are listening to it with you
<7> and oh the people who share their headsets
<7> with friends
<6> nosun: no, see, heres the difference
<7> thats so illegal;)
<6> iPods, and all MP3 players are marketed with software to use your own music, from your own cd collection
<6> its not illegal to own MP3's, so long as you have the origional copy
<8> and the pirate bay is marketed with options to upload linux and other legal torrents...
<7> thats 2 people listening to the same song file
<7> thats totally illegal
<7> suppose to be 1 per person
<6> it is illegal to distribute those same MP3, regardless if you have that copy
<6> its not illegal to own an iPod, its illegal to have un paid for music on it tho
<6> nosun: exactly
<8> and it's not illegal to use the pirate bay, but it's illegal to download files with their torrents...
<7> I completely agree
<8> so tell me the difference...
<6> 2 people listening to 1 paid for song
<7> it should be illegal to own speakers though
<7> :)
<6> Martijn: they are actively participating in the distribution of that music
<8> and apple isn't?
<6> nosun: no, because you may own that music
<6> Martijn: no
<6> theyre playing the music, under the ***umption you ripped that from your collection, or paid for it with the numerous services
<8> they are making it possible to play your illegal music
<7> and any device that may intermit or un intentionally allow un autherized people to listen to the music
<7> emit rather*
<7> ;)
<8> they would just have to add drm..
<6> Martijn: making it possible to PLAY it, isn't the same as actively participating in distributing illegal content
<8> apple is not ***uming you ripped that from your own collection just like the pirate bay isn't ***uming you are uploading legal files...
<7> Idle..... pirate bay chooses to have pirate in there name
<7> but that don't make em so called "pirates"
<8> well the pirat bay only makes it possible to download...
<6> nosun: the name has nothing to do with it
<6> its the fact that theyre distributing it that has the issue


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #computers
or
Go to some related logs:

using Bloomberg with a sql database
#beginner
#windowsxp
telusmail.net
#hardware
#gamedev
#nhl
#beginner
#politics
#tcl



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes