@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45



Comments:

<0> and compacted next day
<1> good
<1> YOU GO TO HELL AND YOU DIE
<1> STUPID MORON
<0> | _flyback
<0> | (away) SLEEP
<2> kuragari, overclocking doesn't kill your parts
<3> it can
<2> overvolting can
<2> raining the clocks on ram actually just increases timings
<3> and thats what i said in the first place
<3> how much damage does overvolting do
<3> i didnt say overclocking
<1> oo
<2> oh sorry
<1> asian chick stripping



<1> yes
<2> that was a combination of reading my own text and your's
<1> yes
<3> heh
<2> and, depends on the chip
<2> ram can be overvolted pretty well
<1> chick in the movie with whesley snipes
<2> processors as well, you trade chip life
<2> on a processor if you overvolt too much
<3> well, flyback made the comment, so i was askign him how bad it was
<3> but he's distracted
<3> by a semi-naked woman
<2> well, I overclock on most anything
<3> on TV
<2> videocard, ram, processor, motherboard
<1> it will cause them to eventually fail or randomly foul up
<3> i dont overclock anything
<2> My **** runs just fine
<3> _flyback, but how long you figure that would take?
<3> its not immediate
<1> dunno
<1> it's random
<1> welcome to cmos semiconductors
<1> why do you think I have spent $80 in static bags
<3> and most gamers replace all their **** every 6-12 months anyways
<1> static = up to 20,000 volts
<1> if you can afford to be liek that
<2> yeah, i do replace my **** every 6 months
<1> have fun :)
<3> see?
<1> I replace mine every 6 yts
<1> if that
<2> but, all my old machines
<2> run fine
<3> so hardware damage is the last hting he's worried about
<4> I replace my **** when I can't run the game
<5> i replace mine usually ever 1.5 yrs or so
<1> thran
<3> if it runs good for 6 months, its all good
<4> my last gaming machine ran most games at 640x480, or 800x600, on minimum settings
<1> it can cause random data corruption
<1> it's not like a yes or no problem
<2> yeah, it can
<1> it will just sliently drive you insane
<2> but the chance of it is so minor and rare anymore
<1> bull****
<2> dude, any amd chip that they release
<1> I worked for circuit board ***embly company
<2> is at least 500 mhz underclocked
<1> no
<2> from what it can perform on a regular, daily basis
<1> that's not always true
<3> intel does that too
<5> i work for intel
<1> that's 100% bull****
<3> cpus have always been underclocked
<1> when they first start out
<1> the yields can be low
<1> and all test slow



<2> wtf, that's not bull**** at all.
<1> unless you know a stepping chart
<1> and know that that stepping
<1> usually 90% RUN at xxx mhz
<1> you are pushing your luck
<2> heh, on the new 90 nm technology
<1> thran it ****s more
<1> the current leakage is getting worse and worse
<1> one of the reasons they had to nuke the p4
<1> besides being a piece of ****
<1> it's design really leakaged current badly
<2> okay, I'm not too sure on the current leakage of the p4
<2> I don't buy pentium
<0> maybe they nuked it not because it was "bad" but because society wants change
<0> the way cars look diff every year
<0> :)))))))))))))))
<1> rynz no
<1> it's bad
<1> p4 was all about mhz
<1> not good performance per mhz
<1> to fool the m***es
<1> and with cmos
<2> yeah, p4 just packed more and more transiters on a single die
<1> the higher the mhz
<2> and raised the clock
<1> the worse the current leakage
<3> longer pipeline, more mhz
<3> the bigger numbers look good to customers, thats all
<1> and they hit a brick wall
<0> so whats the successor?
<0> D?
<1> they just need to go to performance rating likr amd
<2> but, I know that amd's are underclocked
<1> rynz the new cpu from intel
<1> is based on the pentium-m/centrino
<2> people have been pushing amd 3200's to almost 3ghz
<1> btw desgiend by intel's jew division
<0> thats hardly
<0> a gaming cpu
<3> i know all the p1-3 were underclocked
<2> and running them full load for 5 months no end
<2> with no problems
<3> p4 i honestly dont know
<1> eat it you basterds
<0> so gaming systems going
<0> amd?
<1> rynz no the new intel cpu might be good
<0> they'd be stupid to ditch that market
<1> it's not a stock pentium-m
<1> it's modified and dual core remeber
<0> dell bought Alienware
<0> hah
<1> yep
<2> the only real danger in overvolting is burning a motherboard
<3> old news
<1> lets dell offer amd
<1> without intel threatening to cut off their cpu supply
<2> or frying your processor by pushing it too far
<1> thran if you say so
<0> those dudes had a tight operation
<0> dells corporate rules
<0> are gonna make aliewnare
<0> turn **** in a few years
<2> alienware is ****
<2> flyback, seriously, if you were to overclock your system 10%
<0> they sold for mad loot
<0> now ferraries, and mansions
<0> young men
<2> aside from not noticing a difference, its not going to affect anything
<2> those chips are made to take higher clock ratios, especially on current voltage
<2> especially at 1:1 ratio, you risk very low data corruption because everything runs at the same clock
<1> http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0559069/
<3> hmmmm


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #computers
or
Go to some related logs:

#windowsxp
golden kiloger
#visualbasic
#slackware
#politics
#goal
#delphi
#politics
#windows
manually relete



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes