| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2
Comments:
<0> That is a normal day in Houston
<0> Cali freaks are just weaksauce
<1> you know its sad when bicycle riders take steroids
<2> to win a race with the word france in it
<3> ruh roh http://www.net-security.org/advisory.php?id=6547
<4> i really hope landis didnt do the roids
<1> you know how you can tell he did, lnk?
<1> yesterday he was amazed and had no idea
<1> today he has naturally high levels of test
<1> obvious lie
<4> ugh
<4> <lance> greg, thanks ****face.
<4> +o
<1> hah
<1> lance armstrong was on the juice as well
<1> everyone is on it
<1> any sport where strength is crucial, steroids are there
<5> hmm
<5> later
<6> don't let the door hit your *** on the way out
<1> you ever see frank caliendo do his impersonation of al pacino?
<4> nein
<1> search caliendo pacino on youtube
<1> best pacino impersonation ever
<7> wow
<1> ?
<1> asa bug #8429354574?
<7> no
<4> customer up here found a few bugs
<4> but wont roll back due to ospf support improving
<1> ewwww
<7> kal
<7> asa 7.3 will have eigrp
<7> phear
<1> hahah oh no
<7> remember the early eigrp code?
<7> i do
<7> ;)
<7> scarey
<7> -e
<1> one acronym
<1> SIA
<1> :(
<7> **** sia
<7> that's poor design
<7> i have seen more than enough bugs in eigrp
<7> with the early code
<1> i dont **** with people who have routing protocols in their spec
<1> i let my brotha from anotha motha take those
<1> ill grudgingly do asa
<4> kal, hah
<1> but i cant see the need for ospf on a firewall
<4> that was today's issue
<4> noc+kal
<4> best way of changing advertised next-hop, aside from route-map?
<4> hrm...route-map on receiving routers? but seems messy
<1> route-maps all i can think of off top of my head
<7> lnkBOS: what are you trying to do?
<7> just point them somewhere else?
<4> got 2 boxes, with a shared address
<4> not doing carp/hsrp/vrrp/etc
<4> so i need route to originate from shared address
<4> not interface ip
<1> what are the boxes? asa?
<4> no
<4> you know who i work for
<1> they do an active/active setup, if you will?
<1> brb dogs barkin
<4> no
<4> active/standby
<4> which is why i need em to originate from shared address
<4> man this **** is embar***ing
<7> lnkBOS: why can't you use a route-map
<8> 23:19 <@kaleido> they do an active/active setup, if you will?
<8> I ****ING WON
<7> doing 100 things at once here...my response will be delayed
<8> T
<4> noc, i tried
<4> our gay *** sw wont do it
<7> what routing protocol?
<4> ospf
<9> try GLBP, it does active/active
<4> ah it's worthless
<4> i'll bitch at product dev
<4> and **** with dirty route-maps for now
<2> working for f5 = like getting told to beat off with both hands tied behind your back
<2> <lnk> im david blaine!
<8> f5 == ****ed
<1> lnk, perhaps they dont need ospf and just need to be told why
<1> i mean, this is a load balancer of some sort, right?
<1> one interface each hanging off a switch or switches?
<7> haha
<7> lnk
<7> come to the dark side
<7> we use cisco here
<7> they have route-maps
<7> wtf are you running ospf on a bigip anyway?
<7> :)
<8> **** a bigip
<8> in the ***
<8> with my ****
<4> kal, i told dude
<4> no ****ing need for ospf
<4> so most like war between me and sales rep+eng next week
<4> likely*
<4> noc, customer loves ospf for redundancy
<7> ospf is for ROUTING
<4> surprise!
<7> that line there just gave me a headache
<7> ****er
<1> well, dont make it a war
<7> 19:46 <@lnkBOS> noc, customer loves ospf for redundancy
<1> you gotta have a sales hat in your closet somewhere
<4> but when f5 folk hear ospf
<4> they think dollars in licensing
<4> here's the thing
<4> if i dont get ospf working
<4> that's egg on my face
<1> yeah i hear you
<4> if i make it clear to customer that ospf is not necessary
<4> that's egg on sales face
<7> **** sales
<7> :)
<1> yeah, im down with the communication breakage
<1> you gotta talk with your sales guy
<4> so i set up custy with static routes and redistribute static subnets
<4> and told him i'd get back to him after some research/support calls/etc
<4> made him feel all warm and fuzzy by pulling cables and watching **** failover
<1> well, theres gotta be somethin in your code thatll do it
<4> it's not our code
<1> this cant be the first case where this came up
<4> that is the embar***ing part
<4> 19:21 <4> man this **** is embar***ing
<4> kal, it really wouldnt surprise me if it was
<4> and if it's not, internal team is keeping quiet
<4> as if they dont know nothing
<1> oh dude
<1> you need to talk with your sales guy and let him know "hey we cant do this. i talked to so-and-so in support/whoever and he says we cant"
<1> then push for the ability to be added
<1> while offering the customer a better idea
<1> like not wasting lb cycles on ospf
<1> but id definitely hand the ball back to sales and let them slicktalk and wine/dine their way out cleanly
<4> word
<1> cause theyll escalate like madmen to your inside teams
<1> Kelly Ripa: The stupidest woman on television is an absolute embarr***ment to all of woman kind. She's probably too stupid to ask for a dildo in the ear, but I'd love to do it.
<4> i'd hit it.
<4> end of story.
<1> **** yeah
<10> anyone want to explain 'BGP with loopback peering' to me?
<1> ok the nutshell version
<10> ok :)
Return to
#cisco
or
Go to some related
logs:
#beginner
#delphi
#linux-noob
#politics
#politics
#delphi
#politics
#mirc
mary magdellon
#sex
|
|