| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Comments:
<0> is this the appropriate place to ask question when chasing down some network gremlins?
<1> oc***ionally. kinda hard to know in advance.
<0> well, i'll pose one then ... i've just converted my network from RIPv2 to OSPF, and my C6006 doesn't seem to happy
<0> more specifically, it seems that it is routing from one subnet (vlan15, 10.15.0.0/16) to another (vlan7, 10.7.0.0/16) but not back
<0> most interesting, is that i only see this behavior when i bring up a new host
<0> e.g., i just brought up a new host, 10.15.1.14, on vlan15, and was unable to ping it from a host 10.7.0.51 on vlan7
<0> an extended ping on the router card allowed me to ping 10.15.1.14 from its 10.7.0.1 interface
<0> would anyone have any ideas as to why i might be seeing this weird delay? or have i explained it too poorly..
<2> everything hangs off the switch?
<2> both vlans, the hosts, etc?
<2> i mean, if everything is on one switch, why the hell are you even bothering with a routing protocol?
<3> multiple vlans
<3> Check for borked mask on a vlan router interface
<2> if its all one one device
<2> who cares about multiple anything
<4> i bet one of you vlan int's is 10/8
<2> everything is a connected network already
<0> the two devices i'm testing with are connected to a 3550 which hangs off the 6006 (dot1q trunk)
<0> bothering with a routing protocol because we have several routers
<0> and all vlan interfaces are 10/16 with the exception of 2 which are 10/24
<0> already checked all masks, but will double check again just to make sure..
<4> so if RIPv2 was working, why the **** did you break ****?
<0> the network has gotten more complex with more sites coming online
<4> RIPv2 scales
<4> and i'd wager $100 that "more sites coming online" really just means at most 5
<4> and
<0> rather than being criticized for doing what i am told..
<0> i would just like to understand why an extended ping might work successfully, but nothing is being routed from any other host on that subnet
<4> i'd wager another $100 that there was no testing of OSPF before some started ****ing with the productino network
<4> subnet mask
<2> ill bet ospf is constantly having to reconverge because something is ****ed up in the config
<0> well it's a good thing this is a test network, because then i'd break even
<2> but considering you basically asked us "the network is messed up, why?"
<4> coldfire2: congrats
<2> its impossible to give you an answer
<0> i hope i'm not giving the impression that i've come here because i want anyone to solve my problem .. i'd like to understand it myself, but don't know where to look
<5> wow thats an awesome line
<4> can't always understand the problem until it's fixed
<2> and we cant tell you
<0> i don't think that i mentioned i am able to ping from 10.7.0.51 to any host on 10.15.0.0/16 except for new hosts
<2> because you havent told us anything
<5> rar up the configs and email them
<5> ill whiteboard it
<4> try some traceroutes
<4> both directions
<4> multiple hosts and ints
<4> gather more information
<4> actually listen to what 4 people who get paid to do this **** for living suggested instead being a cocky *** and glancing back over your configs
<4> that's the answer #cisco gives
<2> amen brotha
<4> funny ****
<4> in a meeting w/ all the dirs, and about 6 other mid managers
<4> someone asked a question, i answered it, and my boss corrected me
<4> new chick we hired then spoke up, and corrected him saying i was correct in the first place
<4> between us we make 3x as him, we're his technical people, and he doesn't listen
<4> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulOYjCjgX9Y -- pasted last night but still ****ing dope
<6> <4> new chick we hired then spoke up, and corrected him saying i was correct in the first
<6> that is one stupid bitch
<4> hah
<7> burp
<4> i disagree
<6> she might favor you, but she is still stupid
<4> esp in the middle of implementation meetings regarding new ERP systems
<6> like kaleido said, you can cure cancer and **** a ****
<6> you're not a hero, you're a cock****er
<2> true dat
<4> haha
<6> that **** = wisdom
<6> will keep you in line to the fullest
<4> too much is riding on this project
<6> your project = taking off from the wrong runway
<4> hahaha
<4> in through the out door
<4> whatever
<4> as long as it works
<6> wrong
<6> gotta be done right
<2> yep
<2> just like 2nd place is the biggest loser
<8> WILMINGTON, N.C. - Forecasters issued a hurricane watch for the Carolina coasts Thursday, and Virginia.s governor declared a state of emergency as Tropical Storm Ernesto neared hurricane strength in the Atlantic.
<7> too bad it didn't make a left hand turn and knock new orleans off the ****ing map
<2> im declaring a state of emergency right now
<2> im out of pepsi
<8> why is it
<8> everytime a republican becomes mayor/governor
<8> they end up running against bush policy?
<8> not saying it's a bad thing
<8> then again, never mind
<8> the two states im thinking of are ca and nyc
<2> heh
<2> only way you win an election here without being democrat is when your presence makes a mockery of the whole system
<2> otherwise you better be democrat and promising new additions to welfare
<8> promising more payouts to sf bums
<8> i still cant believe they pay $300/mo to the homeless
<6> telix ftw
<2> dude california is as close as you can get to socialism without diving all the way in
<2> its sickening
<2> theyre actually pondering a law requiring "competition-free" little leagues
<2> no scores
<2> no winners or losers
<2> i mean, what the **** are they trying to teach kids these days?
<8> as much as i want to say that's bad
<8> you know that's just one wackjob city council person
<8> that wont get p***ed
<8> that CANT get p***ed
<2> dude thats something on the floor of the senate
<8> cant get p***ed
<8> cant
<2> id hope not
<2> but its california
<2> we dont wanna teach kids about life
<8> nah
<2> we wanna coddle them so they live with their parents until theyre 30
<8> nj rep tried to float a bill to ban clowns, fitness gear, etc from federal bldgs
<2> hahahaha
<2> id support banning clowns
<2> you cant trust those sumbitches
<2> ****, smokers in california are lookin at payin an additional $2.60 per pack of cigarettes
<2> people wouldnt quit when they wee warned about it, so lets tax them to death
<2> force them into submission!
<7> its total bull**** too
<2> no doubt
<7> no smoking in bars
<2> state budget is ****ed beyond all recognition
<7> how in gods name do they get away with that
<2> and they think taxing smokers will fix it?
<2> abt: san francisco and los angeles
<7> I know alot of people who cant drink and not smoke
<2> filled to the ****in brim with bleeding hearts
<8> i dont smoke
<7> I do
<7> and I love it
<2> i did
<2> and $3.79 a pack was bad enough
<2> it would have ****ed to be forkin out $6+ for a pack
<7> you smoke newports?
<6> i hope they charge $20/pack
<6> **** do i care
<2> no i smoked camels
<7> werd
<7> brother fl0fl0
<7> easy killah
<8> <dave-attel> $8/pack in nyc
<6> quit smoking
<8> <dave-attel> for $2, i could be smoking crack
<6> first you leave cali
<6> then you gonna die?
<7> not that easy
<7> well
<7> someone had to run this **** over here
Return to
#cisco
or
Go to some related
logs:
SENDER_NOCHECK
wap54gx fix
flybackcopter
#linux-noob
#politics
#firebird
osisrus
freebsd module_register
#politics
#politics
|
|