| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Comments:
<0> orly?
<1> hrmm.. la-paz.mit.edu, eh?
<1> wow, mit has 18.0.0.0/8
<0> That's nothing, I have 10.0.0.0/8, 192.168.0.0/24 and another one I like to keep hidden from public knowledge!
<0> Err.
<0> 192.168.0.0/16
<1> woah, hund is an ARIN ******in
<2> I have 0.0.0.0/32
<1> that's so leet.. oh wait, ipv4.. that's actually kinda lame. :P
<3> whats the correct way to scroll a richedit to the end? ive been using EM_LINESCROLL, i asked this in #win32 but everyone seems to be idle
<4> i'm bored
<5> so, buddy went to walmart to buy a can of compressed *AIR* and got ID'd on the grounds that people were using them as ihalant drugs..
<2> acctualy, that *would* be the perfect thing for it though
<5> well you wont really get high of a can of compressed air
<5> more than you would from going up on some mountain
<5> or even not breathing citysmog
<6> DCC SEND "string" 0 0 0
<5> how about getting it right :p
<0> Hm? It works like that.
<0> binrapt: I took a look at #depression for a while.
<7> hund: Sorry to hear that.
<0> It's not even amusing.
<7> It's just meaningless spam, really. They talk about drugs and insult each other all the time.
<7> Add some Myspace and Youtube URLs and you got the #depression conversation in a nutshell.
<8> I have a function that is supposed to print the contents of the linked lists in a chained hash table called PrintTable() - the program dies while calling PrintTable, any ideas? - http://www.rafb.net/paste/results/UMkwvC16.html
<4> is there epic/ircii trick to make it not slpit URLs ? like, print it is mouse-copyable fashion ?
<9> are we handling irc client questions now?
<4> you are not
<10> Bah, the new digg is text-resize-unfriendly just like the new Slashdot.
<1> Teckla: unfriendly how?
<4> ncaller: try to comment out line 188 and see if it still crashes
<10> CStubing: Sometimes text gets rendered over other text or scroll bars appear instead of text flowing to the next line.
<10> It seems like every site that eventually gets the CSS religion ends up being text-resize-unfriendly.
<1> Teckla: in what browser? I use konqueror and firefox and I resize all the time.. haven't noticed problems with the new slashdot.
<4> world record for pi digita is 1,200,000,000,000 digits
<4> *digits
<10> CStubing: I'm in Firefox at the moment, running 1024x768, and increased the digg font size two levels.
<10> Web sites seem a little happier to resize one level, but generally much less happy to resize (increase) two levels.
<4> hmmm what's this M parameter to this pi computation program...
<4> <=100
<4> ah, no. <=25
<4> Start of PI calculation up to 33554432 decimal digits
<4> let's ee how long it takes
<4> 33 million
<4> can take hours
<10> I wonder if it's just a fundamental problem with CSS.
<1> Teckla: yeah, I see what you mean.. it's not a fundamental problem at all... the problem, I think, is that people don't consider resizing issues when they design
<10> Yeah, probably not.
<4> Teckla: do you mean, it becomes too wide ?
<4> need horiz scrolling ?
<1> if it were designed properly, there would be a hierarchical tree model for the container elements
<10> I increase text size all the time since I often have a hard time reading fonts as small as the web designers choose.
<10> eMishGLX: Yes.
<1> instead, people put things side-by-side, and it works out fine at the default font size... and blows apart when you change sizes
<8> eMishGLX in fact it does still crash but it takes a lot longer too after looping in that function for quite a bit
<4> Teckla: actually, it need horizontal scolling for me even on normal and small font sizes
<1> it's unfortunate, but it's just one of those things u need to get used to because you're not a normal user.
<4> define normal user
<4> IE user ?
<1> normal user == one whose practices conform with those of the majority of users
<5> a normal user woudlnt know that tho
<1> I'm merely stating that resizing text is something most users don't do (or even know they can do)
<4> why not them being normal web designers ?
<10> CStubing: Yeah, most of my colleagues will just get real close to their displays and squint, whereas I just hit Ctrl Plus a few times to increase the font size.
<1> heh.. web designers have to strike a balance between elegance, speed of implementation, and target audience
<10> I think web designers are fundamentally attracted to fonts that are too small for comfortable reading for some reason.
<4> I like the "Disallow documents to use other fonts" button in Mozilla
<4> Don't know if FF has it
<4> sometimes it helps when site wants to use weird fonts
<8> why do you think that line makes it crash
<4> ncaller: shut up and just do it
<1> I like KDE's default stylesheet.. you can alter the defaults when a page doesn't specify background color, text color, etc...
<1> so if you have a cool color scheme going, you can make the content inside your web browser part of it (sometimes)
<1> until you get some jerk who set the text color and just ***umed that by not setting the background color, everyone sees white...
<4> wow rinning pi generation and firefox makes my cpu fan run like crazy
<8> I did do it, and it gets past that point but crashes later on when I byp*** line 188
<8> I'm just asking what am I doing wrong on line 188?
<8> I realize that I am doing something wrong
<4> good boy
<4> now you are thinking
<4> thiking == cuddle your eyebrows and make serious face
<4> that's wha thinking is!
<8> okay game face on
<4> you can also squint your eyes
<8> if I do right now I will fall asleep
<4> and tense the mouth
<10> I've traditionally liked KDE but I'm really liking GNOME on Ubuntu (which is what I'm using right now).
<4> but the eyebrows are the most important
<8> ok
<1> Teckla: there's a purist in me who likes running a really light WM, but there are a few things here and there that I've really come to like about KDE, so I put up with all its weight.
<8> I for one really like katapult
<4> i said squint, not close
<8> my bad I'm squinting
<4> then tell me what you're doing bad on line 188
<4> btw did it crash on line 188 before ?
<8> I honestly don't know. just trying to print a string stored at some address
<8> yes it has always crashed there since it has existed earlier today
<4> do you ***ing curr->offset anywnhere in the program, anything ?
<4> not that i see
<4> ah you do
<4> maybe you strings in mpool are not 0-terminated
<4> *your
<4> your strncpy on line 149 is very bad
<4> or maybe you overflow mpool
<4> you never check for overflow
<4> there are too many reasons
<8> if (len >= poolsize-pooloffset-1) {
<8> mpool = ReallocateMemory(mpool, poolsize+ONE_MEGABYTE);
<8> poolsize += ONE_MEGABYTE;
<8> before line 149 I do that to see if the string I'm about to copy into mpool will overflow it, if so I realloc mpool
<8> to be 1 MB larger
<4> why this pi-calc loads both of my CPUs
<4> must be multithreaded or something
<4> heh
<8> what is wrong with the strncpy on line 149? Not that I'm disagreeing with you obviously something is wrong but I don't see what is wrong with it.
<4> ONE_MEGABYE *is not* 1,000,000
<8> yes I know that
<8> just a generalization for nwo
<8> for now
<4> you 'd be better of just malloc-ing the strings with strdup()
<4> off
<4> than doing this strange pool thing
<4> which is possibly buggy
<8> well I can't use strdup because it has to run on Windows where strdup is not available
<4> void *strdup(char *s) { void *p=malloc(strlen(s)); if(!p) return NULL; strcpy(p,s); return p; }
<4> that's what strdup is
<4> or even
<4> void *xstrdup(char *s) { void *p=malloc(strlen(s)); if(!p) abort(); strcpy(p,s); return p; }
<8> that is nice, I'll play with that.
<4> oops, i had bug
<4> it shall be ... malloc(1+strlen(s));
<8> okay
<4> calc strdup
<11> void *strdup(const char *s) { void *p; if(!(p=malloc(1+strlen(s))) return NULL; return strcpy(p,s); }
<4> calc strdup
<11> void *strdup(const char *s) { void *p = malloc(1+strlen(s)); if(!p) return NULL; return strcpy(p,s); }
<4> that's better
<12> nerd
<4> proudly
<4> well when something is one-liner, it's one-liner
<4> even if you reformat it into 7 lines
<5> mmm off by one bugs
<4> ?
<13> where
<4> he means, in the old line
<13> ah
<5> is gcc mudflap effective against this sorta thing?
<12> dude
Return to
#c
or
Go to some related
logs:
libmp4+suse 10.0
#delphi
#solaris
#beginner
#goal
heeha29
mplug addon
Gag-Gun
#stocks
how about a nice mug of shut the fuck up
|
|