| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Comments:
<0> Mish: are you a girl?
<1> no
<1> why ?
<0> oh nothing ;)
<2> He's just gay.
<0> i can see getting upset over getting reject in real life, but for all you know that girl could be an automated program or a guy
<3> maybe she's not *subtle*
<0> so i wouldn't dwell on it for any more than about 6 seconds
<3> naa he's not
<2> I'd go stick my **** in an electric socket if I were you.
<3> it's site where bot can't register
<0> your 6 seconds are up
<3> and she writes in russian. in good russian
<3> bots don't write in russian
<2> ahaghahahag
<3> maximum, if bad english
<3> *in
<3> the inflexion rules are just too difficult
<3> i mean, it's not irc
<2> AHAHAHAHAHHAAH
<2> In all the history of computers, there's never been a competent Russian... Much less a simple translator that actually works.
<2> I mean... Na... Couldn't happen.
<3> davar: with humanlike decent nick, you better behave decently
<2> AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
<2> MishMan: Humanlike? I'm nothing like a human.
<3> do try to be
<3> i meant, your nick looks human this time
<2> Humans are vile, disgusting, manipulative, evil things that need to burn in Hell.
<4> davarus: http://videos.streetfire.net/video/1ea98a61-9ae3-4244-9d0a-14e3396b238a.htm
<4> davarus: that vid will reaffirm your theory
<2> SgtUnix: I don't have a video player installed.
<4> it requires flash :P
<2> And which theory is that?
<4> who doesn't have flash?
<5> Google's Skynet is going to nuke us all as soon as it becomes sentient anyway. Why worry about tomorrow!?!?
<4> davarus: that humans are vile?
<4> basically it's just a bunch of retards in Oakland, CA smashing cars intraffic
<4> for absolutely no reason
<2> Teckla: No it wouldn't. That would be counterproductive.
<2> The whole concept of nuking is wrong.
<2> It would never be done.
<4> skynet.google.com has address 66.249.81.69
<5> SgtUnix: What's their excuse this time?
<4> woah
<2> There is no incentive.
<4> Teckla: absolutely none.
<5> SgtUnix: Who's involved?
<4> Bunch of mexicans and black guys.
<4> Who specifically? No idea
<2> It's his cousins and their friends.
<2> Don't believe his lies.
<6> erm how do I figure my horizontal and vertical sync rates? ddcprobe gives me a few "timings" and "ctimings"?
<6> http://cdgenp01.csd.toshiba.com/content/product/pdf_files/detailed_specs/tecra_8100.pdf also is vague
<3> s/tecra/tecla/
<3> http://www.99-bottles-of-beer.net/c.html
<3> i need to solder the rs232-controlled device that controls the 220v switch
<3> a relay + transistor, basically
<3> 4 components
<2> Something is definitely leaking.
<2> Incompetents.
<7> hey, can anyone help me with this -> http://pastebin.4programmers.net/140
<7> it returns socet(): sucess
<8> char *c; c=strcpy(c,"bla"); << why does this give me a segmentation fault when executing?
<2> webby: I give up. Why does it?
<9> what does: int i; printf("%d\n", i); print?
<8> i dunno
<10> webby: because you didn't initialize c before using its value
<8> :|
<11> you are trying to copy a string into a pointer, not going to happen
<3> webby: your computer doesnt have enough memory
<7> webby you must allocate some memory where the string will be stored before acutally copying there anything
<9> char *p = malloc(9); strcpy(p, "blah"); works just fine
<8> thx
<10> char c[5]; strcpy(c, "blah");
<7> ok, so anyone can help me now with this -> http://pastebin.4programmers.net/140
<7> ? :)
<8> ack, it prints 134513600
<3> long long x; char *c=(char*)x; strcpy(c,"bla");
<2> Yes. I will help you by telling you to READ A BOOK.
<12> ivo: a) You haven't asked a specific question b) You still haven't realized that you might look at h_errno?
<7> my godd, it's you again Xirtam ;)
<10> if (gniazdo != -1) { ERROR; } <- ...
<10> write(gniazdo,NULL,sizeof(NULL)); <- excuse me wtf r u doin
<7> mauke sending NULL char
<10> think again, bat man
<3> maaaaaaaaaan
<10> you got all three arguments wrong
<9> webby, and you tried to strcpy into 134513600
<8> yeah now i got it, sry, dudes
<7> write(int fd, const void *buf, size_t count); gniazdo is socket (int), NULL hmmm I see
<10> I_v0: gniazdo should be a file descriptor, not -1
<10> buf should point to valid storage
<10> and count should be the number of bytes to write, not the size of the pointer
<3> I_v0: you want write(xxx,"", 1)
<3> if you want t send nul char
<7> mauke this was errorous !=-1, it should connect somwhere and then send
<7> MishMan I see
<3> "Nie udaBo si otworzy poBczenia!\n"
<3> hmmm that not what i typed
<7> MishMan what with that string ?
<3> nothing
<7> k
<3> "BBd"
<3> this irc client doesn't like this l crossed char
<3> I wonder what's "Blad" in this language mean
<11> I have a pointer to a pointer to a struct s1 **pps. One of the members of s1 is a pointer to another struct we'll call this s2 *ps, I need to test if pps->ps is equal to NULL so I tried: if (*pps->ps == NULL) but it comes back and says error: request for member 'ps' in something not a structure or union. How do I access a member of a pointer to a pointer to a struct
<10> ncaller: pps->ps is the same as (*pps).ps
<10> ncaller: (*pps) is not a struct. that's your error.
<10> you want (*pps)->ps or (**pps).ps
<3> poltran.com gave me "No translation" for "Blad"
<11> okay I'll study and play with that a bit thanks
<7> MishMan Bd (Blad) means error
<7> ;)
<3> Bljad
<11> so -> has more precedence than *
<10> yes
<10> ->foo is a postfix operator, more or less
<13> that's an interesting way of thinking of it.
<13> i wanna go ride my motorbike. screw working today
<13> but to pay for my toys i need to work. *sigh*
<3> there are two exceptions to the rule "all unary ops have higher precedence that binary ops. These two exceptions are x.y and x->y"
<13> that's like 10% of the ops right there.
<3> 46 ops in C
<3> i m not kidding
<3> i just counted
<13> wcalc 2/46
<13> dcalc 2/46
<14> answer: 0.04347826086956522
<3> 4.3%
<13> i wonder why wcalc doesn't work.
<13> mcalc 2/46
<3> wcalc 2 / 46
<15> dcalc 2/46
<14> answer: 0.04347826086956522
<3> !calc 2 / 26
<3> rcalc 2 / 46
<14> cout says: Not enough parameters
<10> you broke my wcalc :(
<13> wcalc 2 + 2
<14> wcalc 2
<14> dcalc 2
<13> hrm.. that doesn't work
<3> wcalc 2/ 46
<14> answer: 0.04347826086956522
<13> i dunno what happened to it. algorithm just sort of lost it's mind for a while.
<3> **** happens
<13> oops
<3> OrngeTide: I want to solder rs323-controlled device that controls simlpe power switch. DO you have advice ?
<13> i closed my connection with algorithm running. :)
<13> MishMan, why not just buy one?
Return to
#c
or
Go to some related
logs:
#freebsd
#hardware
kismet wrt54gl
#stocks
#nhl
#beginner
#fedora
#beginner
#red
#gamedev
|
|