| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Comments:
<0> maybe soeone stole his nickl ?
<1> Possible.
<2> Someone doesn't like the whole bell.ca domain apparently
<3> aedinius, i wanted to have it to play a couple games and to run ms project. but sinc eit doesn't work i'm just going to do it in parallels. although no 3d accelleration in parallels so no games.
<2> That domain probably has above 100k users though
<4> yoelPlat: err, no, you're wrong.
<4> yoelPlat: Hamas's main sponsor and supporter = Iran
<4> yoelPlat: Though some parties in Syria do support it
<4> Yes, no doubt.
<3> iran funnels money into everything.
<4> and have taken refuge there, but it's not based there
<4> OrngeTide: *BIG* time into Hamas though.
<3> imagine if iran got to have nuke plants. how many of them would be covertly converted to produce weapons grade material?
<3> seeing as israel and the arabs can get into a shooting war at the drop of a hat, i would appreciate it if NONE of them had nukes.
<5> why not?
<5> solve the problem once and for all
<5> sounds like a plan to me
<3> i really don't want radio active dust sweeping across the globe.
<5> stupid 2000 year+ problem too.
<6> squeeze: apparently you're infamiliar with what detonation of nuclear weapons do to the rest of the world :P
<5> OrngeTide: too late
<6> does
<3> yea. i don't want any more than we have.
<3> right now we're only double pre-atomic background radiation. i don't really want quadruple.
<7> OrngeTide you beast
<3> zid_, it's on its way. :) i have a tracking number for it someplace if you are interested
<7> ooh ***
<3> it's full of pr0n
<7> hah
<3> czth-based pr0n
<7> it'll be rull of XP soon hopefuly
<7> then i'll install vmware
<3> i installed xp on my macbook yesterday. but it ****ed on there. so i deleted it before registering it. i wonder what i'm going to do with this extra copy of XP now.
<3> (i actually paid for xp, again)
<7> oh man, WHY MAN WHY?
<3> so i've sent microsoft $400 total in the last 5 years.
<5> lol
<3> zid_, i need to support balmer's child pornography habbit.
<5> trying to remember the last time I ever bought anything MS
<1> OrngeTide: ballmer has a kiddie porn habit? wtf?
<3> Aeon_, yea. i'm running win2k in parallels right now. it's a lot lighter weight.
<6> i bought one of the sim games once
<6> :P
<7> 00OR444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444`
<3> Aeon_, well i don't have any proof.
<7> sorry, looking for my lighter
<0> ?
<0> proof of what ?
<0> ah that was to aedi
<3> Aeon_, sorry. my tab completion is poor
<5> I'll tell you what works like a breeze in vmware: win2k3 server
<6> why win2k over XP?
<5> unbelievably fast to startup and run
<3> strtok, why XP over 2k?
<0> strtok: it uses less resources
<6> OrngeTide: less patches to install
<6> :P
<0> w2k is lighter
<0> definitely
<6> that's true
<3> strtok, not really.
<3> microsoft doesn't release new patches for 2k very often.
<0> w2k is cheaper, too!!!!!
<6> i meant to get up to speed
<6> unless you have one of those CDs with service backs i guess
<3> and w2k doesn't have the kiddie gui that xp enables by default
<1> XP was only $25 for me
<6> OrngeTide: yes, but easily disabled
<3> yea i have a few of those service pack cds.
<2> I don't recall ever having problems on DMZ with win95/98, I can't say as much for my very brief XP experience :)
<1> OrngeTide: That scares me, I never see it over remote desktop
<3> aedinius, i paid $99 for home edition.
<1> OrngeTide: When I hook it up to a monitor and login locally, it's like "Whoa crap"
<5> lol
<1> OrngeTide: I paid $25 for XP Pro and Pro 64
<3> lucky
<7> I paid for 98 with my PC probably, that's it
<6> zid_: you still have that same PC ?:P
<1> I paid for OSX with my MacBook
<1> And iBook
<3> i paid $139 for xp pro. and it was a waste of money.
<1> And then I bought it separately
<7> it's been replaced piece by piece enough for nothing to still be the same
<7> but sure
<7> same case! :P
<1> OrngeTide: Mine was too =/
<1> I set up that box for gaming since my firends wanted me to bring it to LAN parties
<0> OrngeTide is 1) rich 2) law-obiding
<1> Since then we've not had any LAN parties
<1> So it just torrents
<3> Aeon_, if i couldn't afford the software I would simply not run it. windows is not something i necessarily need.
<3> it seems kind of silly to pirate software when you're a programmer :)
<8> Q: is it possible to use a variable size buffer with fprintf? so i can p*** something to fprintf that will resize itself automatically?
<0> boy, *one* *hundred* *dollars* !
<3> oledole2, nope.
<8> so i basically need to use sprintf with a fixed buffeR?
<3> Aeon_, yea. that's like a week of groceries. i guess i won't be eating this week
<3> oledole2, yes.
<8> k, thanks .)
<8> :)
<3> generally people don't use sprintf to process extremely large format strings. if you need to ***emble large amounts of text there are better methods (that require more work)
<0> where is this mauke's two-liner that does malloc + sprintf
<0> and returns the pointrt to the malloc'd buf
<0> searchcalc msprintf
<9> index: 2753. results:
<0> searchcalc asprintf
<9> index: 2753. results:
<3> well i gotta go. adios.
<0> how do i get fractional part of the double
<0> would it be x-floor(x) ?
<0> anything shorter ?
<0> Maloeran ?
<4> Aeon_: That works, man rint as well
<0> no, rint seems wrong in this context
<0> i can't believe there is not single function for fractional part of a doubl;e
<2> foo = fmod( bar, 1.0 ); ?
<2> I'm not sure if that's much better than x-floor(x)
<4> Aeon_: No, rint works.
<4> Aeon_: ah, I see what you want, my bad.
<0> fmod would prolly be slower
<0> ok, so x-floor(x) it is
<4> It is slower.
<2> I thought fmod() may optimize the 1.0 case or powers of two, but I wouldn't bet on it
<3> i found this neat article on wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Getaddrinfo .. has nice examples of using getaddrinof and getnameinfo to make very generic network routines (protocol indepedent)
<0> after 10+ years on Linux, I still didn't tame the 2+ clipboards of X completely
<0> even though i'm runnin autocutsel
<3> there is that gnome clipboard server too
<3> basically selection buffer versus clipboard thing in X11 was the biggest mistake made in X11.
<2> X itself doesn't have "clipbards", just selections
<3> and that xterm and firefox handle the two totally differently doesn't help
<3> Maloeran, it has selection buffer and cut buffer.
<0> in mozilla, if you use Ctrrl-V it uses one thing, if yuo use middle-mouse, another thing
<1> Aha
<0> but still, something is wrong
Return to
#c
or
Go to some related
logs:
#winxp
concealec carry
compiz: GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap is missing tnt
dj ramen
#linuxhelp
#openbsd
#linuxhelp
#cisco
#freebsd
#windows
|
|