| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Comments:
<0> solution for that was vpn ;/
<1> I hate Windows applications that think they're so important that they need to steal focus from your current window.
<1> When you startup Lotus Notes, it pops up a splash screen above all your other windows. That wouldn't be so bad, except that you can't get any of your other windows back to the front!
<1> So you have to wait until Lotus Notes feels like finishing starting up, which takes approximately the same amount of time it'll take for the sun to burn out.
<0> i suggest a sledge hammer
<2> how do I use % as a character in sprintf
<3> you read how sprintf works?
<1> You can optionally translate all my babbling as: Lotus Notes ****s.
<1> chandler_: %%
<2> sweet thanks man
<4> Teckla: you probably already know there are plenty of alternatives to RDP.. use one! ;)
<1> CStubing: I use VNC tunneled over SSH all the time.
<5> TTTTecklaaaa:: I dunno windows, but dion't you have this LotusNotes& thing ?
<1> Aeon_: I don't understand your question.
<5> the run-in-background & thing
<5> in *background*
<4> yeah, it'd be nice if the window manager was properly encapsulated in windows
<4> so you could just say "Don't allow any app to change z-order/focus"
<4> and so you could set anything to always-on-top, etc
<4> but alas... windows is a plate of spaghetti
<1> Aeon_: I don't think that's the issue.
<5> anr run-minimized property won't help ?
<1> Aeon_: Maybe I'll try that some day. :)
<6> Hi Teckyteckteckla
<1> Hi aedinius :)
<7> Been watching some UK TV recently, aedi?
<8> Two9A you pakistani mani
<8> Gud morning
<9> Two9A, gotta love the lovefest on dsdev atm :)
<7> Yeah, what the hell's going on in there.
<9> stone's been gone for too long, they're getting all touchyfeely :P
<6> Two9A: No, why?
<7> aedi: "mickly-mick-mickey" is a line from Doctor Who (last week's episode)
<6> Two9A: Aha
<8> that dr. who was pretty good
<10> Ew
<8> glad rose is dead
<11> quicky question, just learning and not sure if it can be done better, we must ***ign a preprocessor macro to a variable before we can printf it dont we?
<4> the stuff you smoke... do you have any extra?
<3> quazimodo: no.
<11> what would we do then?
<10> std::cout \o/
<12> shutup binrapt this isnt #c++
<4> quazimodo: why are you plural?
<10> Oh noes, C++ was removed from the topic
<12> printf to teh bone
<10> BoR0: There used to be "C++" in the topic, too
<10> C/ObjC/C++/D
<0> waste of topicbytes ;]
<0> topics are an optimization issue.
<0> ;/
<11> right ill just shut up then and google :/
<10> What was the clip in the topic all about?
<4> quazimodo: int n=5; printf("n is: %d\n",n); // What's so complicated?
<10> It has been removed
<3> quazimodo: not much difference between expanding the macro in an ***ignment, vs as an argument. type perhaps.
<11> CStubing> you are silly, when did i mention a variable? im talking about #define here...
<10> quazimodo: At 17:09:33 CEST.
<13> hey, anybody here use the bloodshed dev-C++ IDE?
<3> bloodshed is a rumor.
<4> 11:07 <+quazimodo> quicky question, just learning and not sure if it can be done better, we must ***ign a preprocessor macro to a
<4> variable before we can printf it dont we?
<4> quazimodo: that's when you mentioned a variable...
<13> twkm: hows that?
<12> we dont use eleet editors and stuff. just pico and gcc
<14> Do you actually use pico for coding?
<13> real programmers use emacs
<14> Blasphemy, vim!
<12> what is wrong with pico
<9> and real men use vim
<8> I use pico
<15> I use pico for coding quite often
<13> I use emacs when I have to do it through terminal
<4> pico just makes you use a whole lot more keystrokes than you have to
<13> otherwise it's all about notepad
<12> pico is small and ***y period
<11> vim and emacs both rock :/
<4> it's the difference between driving 100 miles on a lawnmower and driving 100 miles in a car... both will get you there.. one just goes faster
<12> wow it must be super-ultra cool editor. you type one key and it prints out 2 instead?
<3> its emacs, you have to press twelve keys to get one.
<4> sure... say you want to make 10 copies of the current line... in vim: yy; 10p;... or in pico: C-k; C-u; C-u; C-u; C-u; C-u; C-u; C-u; C-u; C-u; C-u;
<4> and can you control whether you're pasting before or after the current line in pico? no... difference between 'p' and 'P' in vim.
<11> dont have to do that
<11> can put the repeat thinger to 10
<11> wait my bad, thought you said emacs :/
<13> holy crap - so I was gonna ask if anybody knew if you could install bloodshed's dev-C++ onto a thumbdrive and run it from there - but I just tried it out and it definitely works perfectly
<13> and it works perfectly out of the box - no configuration mess to go through - nothing extra to download - just works
<8> there's no reason why it didn't
<8> wouldn't* even
<8> it's just a program that reads and writes files
<13> and compiles
<8> compiling = reading writes, then writing fils
<4> zid_: you can't say that of most windows programs that just read and write files
<13> and debugs
<14> Someone has used microsoft software for too long
<13> well, whatever, I'm ****ing impressed
<8> java307: pfft
<13> Malorean: I think I've spent too much time using Linux software, not Windows software :p
<4> stop using windows. You'll be impressed all the time. ;)
<8> I just transcoded a DVD from a machine in one wrote and wrote the iso to a totaly different machine, in linux
<8> one room*
<13> I'm used to open source software being painful to setup and install, but that was damned easy
<8> i'm used to ./configure; make; make install; done
<13> zid_: normally the done part on my systems is instead replaced by a crash and one huge headache
<4> ./configure --with-cool-****
<4> sounds like he's running too many things in java
<8> nah, it's standard now, it's all --without-cool-****
<9> ./configure --without-evil
<14> Neat, I need to add support for that switch
<16> why do you always prefix stuff with ./ ?
<16> to be 100% sure?
<8> root needs it
<8> so I use it all teh time
<16> root?
<17> because I need it
<17> no user has . in his PATH here
<14> ./ is not generally found in PATH for security reasons
<0> well, for root anyhow
<0> most unices ive seen has it for regurlar users
<0> for some reason
<0> or well i should say linux distros heh
<14> Not any Unix I tried...
<0> see line under
<0> im running 3 distros here
<0> and they all have it for normal users
<0> not for root tho
<16> wait... ./ means "in current directory" correct?
<16> <-- windows guy
<14> Yes
<8> yes
<16> so why would it need to be in PATH??
<14> For those who want to run programs found in the current working directory just by name, for some rason
<0> thezog so you dont have to do ./exe in the current directory
<14> reason, rather
<8> is ./ treated as an absolute path? i.e. is the . substituted for pwd
<0> but its stupid to have it in the path
<14> No zid_, it uses the CWD as starting point before walking the file system(s)
<16> when i execute foo, doesn't lookup start from the local directory, *then* PATH?
<8> same thing
<8> no, PATH
<14> That would be a very serious security problem, thezog
<4> thezog: nope
<16> aha.
<16> why security problem?
Return to
#c
or
Go to some related
logs:
#hardware
#politics
#computers
Runtime Error! WMIADAP.EXE
SUBWAY ras
#politics
chubtoad
#visualbasic
dell m90 ris
filter out tylenol
|
|