| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Comments:
<0> milk does a good job on keyboards
<0> no chance after milk
<1> hardly matters, imo, if it eats the traces
<1> ive killed two keyboards with water
<1> repairable, but difficult probably, and needs special materials.
<0> I saw someone pee on one
<1> basically, you need some sort of conductive goo.
<1> but nothing you have to heat up, because it will melt the substrate.
<0> liquid nitrogen
<0> snap
<1> liquid nitrogen is generally only effective if things are actually dipped in it.
<1> spraying or pouring tends to not work very well. either the material is too good of an insulator, or too good of a conductor.
<1> and a vat large enough for a keyboard requires quite a lot of the stuff.
<0> dip your favorite professor
<0> after shoving a big stick up his arse
<1> hollywood tends to overuse people using various supposedly cold things to break locks and other metal things.. almost impossible irl if you can't actually dip it
<0> wd40 helps a lot with old sytle padlocks
<1> if you're going to be destructive, generally brute force works far better than actually trying to screw with the mechanism.
<0> I've seen peopleopen them with little effort
<1> those O locks with the enclosed shackle tend to be very good.. very resistant to brute force.
<1> however, im much more in favor of integral locks
<1> integral locks have the potiential of being unbreakable by brute force.. plus no weak point where the lock interfaces with the door or mechanism
<1> for eg, a deadbolt on a door is hugely better than a padlock on a door.
<1> but unless the door is made out of steel, you almost certainly can kick it in fairly easily anyway.
<0> I know. I have a deadlock on mine
<1> imo physical security (like computer security) is largely a delaying process.. slow the intruder down for long enough for the humans to show up and put the smack down.
<0> or force them to use more damaging methods to break in
<1> for what purpose?
<0> speed
<1> unless you have military-grade security, pretty much anything is easy to break easily.
<1> im a big fan of fences and walls. a fence around your house is hugely better than trying to beef up the front door.
<2> There's a nice picture of a Windows firewall illustrating that point.
<2> Yeah, there we go. http://obligement.free.fr/images/windows_firewall.jpg
<1> haha
<1> nice
<2> Makes me giggle whenever I see it
<3> "handjob", like in self-hand-job, or like in non-self-hand-job ?
<4> like when you are lying in bed and a girl tries to jack you off for 3 hours, but enda up failing because she has no idea what she's doing.
<5> rofl
<0> 3 hours :)
<5> and then a nice strong man comes along and does it in 5 minutes
<5> right?
<6> lol go back to bluehell a
<5> who the..
<0> no. she whips off her pants and does it properly
<7> Three hours with a hand? Won't that burn terribly?
<6> lmao
<0> wouldn't do much for her hand
<0> wouldn't it ache after that
<1> *** therapists recommend lubricant for these cases
<1> personally, i dont see the purpose in manual stimulation of this type.
<3> llikee, shhe''s in menstruation ?
<1> hmmm
<1> that is an unfortunate case
<1> if anything, that is an argument for multiple wives.
<3> for multiple hands!
<1> i will take keira knightley, natalie portman..
<1> scarlett jowhatever is ok too
<4> hund: yes.
<4> hund: i think i bled once as a result of an attempt at a handjob.
<1> ervvh
<1> lubricant :P
<4> AaronWL: lubricant doesn't do much for a violent bodyward yank.
<3> and when girl does it, is this your preference, or her preference ?
<1> evilgeek, i disagree.
<1> KY jelly works wonders.
<1> with suitable ***y approach, the exact nature of the stimulation is unimportant if proper lube is used.
<3> aedinius, evilgeek: what's so attractive on handjob *** ?
<3> I don't get itr
<1> while handjobs are inferior, imo, if the girl is ***y, it really hardly matters what she does.
<6> lool
<8> zidane had a null pointer last night ...
<3> SIGCRAZY
<3> It is hotly discussed on blogs what the other guy told him.
<3> Like, whether the other guy called him something offensive
<2> it was obviously offensive
<3> but what it was ?
<2> Zidane will never tell!
<1> who cares. he's bad***, and he pwned the n00b.
<0> :)
<4> i was under the impression that zidane was told something about his mother.
<0> but was it true
<4> and, well, if you insult a guy's family, the least you should expect is a headbutt to the sternum.
<0> I just got off the phone taliking to my mother
<3> youur mother knows zidane's mother ?
<1> i have impregnated both of them, i think.
<0> my mother :) she's 66 years old
<0> and looks older too poor thing
<3> some blog speculates that the other guy called him 'tapeworm', his well-known offensive nick
<0> that's alright. tapeworms always take lots of ****
<1> too bad hardly anyone in my country (except immigrants) has any clue about soccer
<1> i think my team managed to kick the ball once or twice...
<3> your country desperately needs more immigrants
<1> sure, marrying a hot american chick gets you in for free.
<9> Is there a standard library function to check if a char is printable?
<10> Printable?
<9> Nevermind, I found it. isprint in clocale and ctype.
<9> Maloeran: A character which is valid for displaying.
<10> I would have ***umed that any character >= 16 are "printable"
<11> yeah, like escape (27)
<11> or delete (127)
<12> 32 <= x <= 126
<11> yes, except or are also printable
<12> for (i=0;i<256;i++) printf("char number $d -> %c", i, i);
<12> see which one prints which one doesnt :P
<11> you're ***uming UCHAR_MAX == 255
<3> ccconttrroll chars are not printable
<13> quiet day today.
<14> no trolls yet?
<14> its still early over here tho ;]
<3> hey the troll is an art
<3> don't disqualify troll as simple thing
<3> you don't have even B.Sc in troll
<2> Er.
<13> actually I do
<2> You jsut stated that trolling is an art, not a science
<2> How does one obtain a Bachelor of Science in trolling?
<3> heh ?
<3> what ?
<2> B.Sc.; that's bachelor of Science
<13> well I did troll my way through all my comp sci cl***es
<3> Ah, easy
<14> Bachelor of trolling.
<3> You take courses, sem,ester, exams
<3> Then , finally, diploma
<2> At maximum, you'd get a BA (or even MA)
<14> and then go troll #c
<2> But a ****ing BSc?
<2> You're talking utter crap, sorry
<3> What, you don't have exams, courses, points ion BA ?
<13> if you don't believe me I'll sent you a fax of my diploma
<2> Nah, it's a similar structure.
<2> You just wouldn't get a BSc
<3> programming is an art, too, but you get BSc in it, not BA
<2> If you have a BSc in trolling, you've got a problem
<3> I believe troll is exact science
<3> despite being an art
<2> 165657 <+Aeon_> hey the troll is an art
<13> I don't see a problem.
<2> It cannot be both.
<3> i don't see a problem, either
<14> i only see solutions.
<3> Two9A: as I said, programming is an art
<3> but you get BSc in programming
<3> not BA
<2> Programming is in no way an art.
<3> so, I proved my point
<3> yes programming is an art
<2> Your evidence?
Return to
#c
or
Go to some related
logs:
#politics
#politics
#gamedev
#politics
#computers
#computers
bigassadventure pw
SQL Server does not allow text, ntext, or image
#flash
cygwin INACCESSIBLE_BOOT_DEVICE
|
|
