| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Comments:
<0> that makes sense?
<1> although it would be nice to know that power plants in the US are being operated safely under international guidelines.
<1> Viniceos, why do you need to inspect for nuclear weapons, we already know the answer is "yes"
<0> i dont see any sense to that. if you're not producing more nuclear weapons, why not let the entire world see?
<2> OT, I'm talking purely about the NPT-related inspection functions.
<1> Viniceos, well we're actually allowed to produce more nuclear weapons under the IAEA.
<3> Viniceos: you said the US has enough weapons to destroy the world severaltimes over what difference does it make if it's 1 time or 1000 times over?
<0> gauze, the us says it's getting rid of its nuclear weapons, why not prove it?
<0> why would you deny inspections on your own facilities?
<4> Because we can?
<3> maybe because the government is really run by telekinetic reptilians?
<1> Viniceos, because inspecting our facilities via the IAEA is not in it's jurisdiction.
<0> to protect your industrial secrets? the nuclear power plants in my country have industrial secrets as well, and we had to give them up
<1> the treaties we have are with other nations, not with the UN, IAEA, or Brazil.
<0> OrageTide, that's not an explanation, that's a legal loophole
<0> OrageTide, i'm not asking about details on your legal system
<0> i'm asking WHY, not how
<1> your problem is that you feel that it's unfair that you need to give up industrial secrets when you are not making nuclear weapons, but the US, because it has nuclear weapons, does not need to give up it's secrets?
<1> i can certainly see how that is unfair.
<1> Viniceos, well the details are for international law, not just my legal system
<0> allright, that's all i'm saying, that it's unfair
<1> okay. agreed.
<1> i admitted from the start that i thought it was kind of unnecessary to go investigating brazil. I think history has shown that Brazil can be trusted.
<1> what's realy bad is the investigations, afaik, aren't kept secret either. they will publish all the results even industrial secrets. (or am I wrong about this)
<1> if the reports are only shown to member countries then it's not too terrible. it's not like G.W.Bush is going to be able to communicate some complex nuclear process to the private sector so they can steal all our ideas.
<1> he has trouble communicating his own name. :P
<5> Yeah.
<1> although i'm bit of a libertarian. i don't believe the US should be interfering in the affairs of sovereign nations. trade embargos, sure. reactions of force, of course. but these committees to push other nations around is just total BS.
<3> lol the leader of the free world is a moron
Return to
#c
or
Go to some related
logs:
tallinder gangbang
turtles you konw what i mean lyrics
#stocks
#ubuntu
#narcotics
#narcotics
#politics
#beginner
#gamedev
#gamedev
|
|