| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Comments:
<0> zid_, the 40 seems good. i can send that
<0> better than nothing
<1> do it, do it now! </lobby scene>
<1> OrngeTide: I saw 3 more hedgehogs this morning
<2> were they pink?
<1> erm.. no..
<1> they were brown..
<0> i didn't know you were seeing any hedgehogs
<2> paint?
<1> they are meant to be brown you retard
<3> I thought they were blue
<1> no that's soniuc
<1> sonic*
<3> sonic is a porcupine
<1> http://zid.rm-f.net/tri.c
<4> hedgehog
<1> nope not that
<1> ****ing X
<1> http://www.astro.virginia.edu/~kw6k/picture/hedgehog/hedgehog%20015.jpg
<1> that
<3> photoshopped
<1> to be not blue?
<3> yes
<1> there's a really fat one going around
<1> looks like a football
<3> it's not fat anymore. I took care of that.
<1> pretty sure he's still there, I gave him a stroke this morning
<3> I thought you were talking about something else going around.
<1> OrngeTide?
<1> I hear he's like the village bike
<5> hrm
<5> there is an integral type that's big enough to hold any pointer. what's it called?
<6> Generally, long. I don't know if it's guaranteed.
<7> intptr_t or uintptr_t.
<6> Oh, that's much cooler.
<7> some argue, incorrectly, that ptrdiff_t would, and in fact it does quite often, but it isn't guaranteed. hell, it isn't even guaranteed to be able to hold the result of subtracting two pointers (into the same object, of course).
<5> long doesn't work.
<5> (according to the standard.)
<7> nothing in c89 is available, only c99's (u)intptr_t.
<0> the bot was nice enough to +v and ban in the same statement. computers are stupid
<8> any lex/yacc guru's here?
<9> lol
<2> a ban must be queued up at a higher priority than voice
<0> i think there is just no ***ociation between them
<2> might be
<2> seperate threads
<2> would you want to wait while it searches through it's banned list before it gives you voice
<2> on some channels it's like that
<2> 2 minutes + before you get voice
<0> uhh. it's an irc bot. do you really think it's multithreaded?
<0> searching is a non-issue. don't use an O(n^2) algorithm
<0> a lot of times you intentionally put a delay on voice. #c needs to have a 30 second voice delay.
<10> im using select on multiple sockets but how can i find which socket timeout or got data?
<11> compare the fd?
<10> how?
<11> == ?
<11> :P
<10> what if i font know any of the fds
<0> kthx^, you walk through your list of sockets (you're keeping a list right?) and do FD_ISSET on the bitmask that select gave you
<0> if you don't know any of the fds then you are stuck. you made a mistake in your design
<10> i know fd_isset but i dont know the fd
<10> how can i fix it?
<11> you should keep track of the fds
<11> iny our own list
<0> keep a list of sockets
<11> but i must make dinner now, and OrngeTide is a much better explainer
<11> :D
<0> poll() forces you to have a list of sockets.
<10> yeah i cant use poll
<2> why can't you?
<10> win32
<10> have to use select
<10> using poll on nix port tho
<0> calc libevent
<12> libevent: a BSD licensed library for dealing with event notification on windows and *nix. Uses select, poll, kqueue, epoll, devpoll, etc. http://www.monkey.org/~provos/libevent/
<2> eeew
<10> ?
<0> poll() isn't significantly better than select() anyways. it's not really faster. and there are some portabillity issues with POLLHUP
<10> should i use libevent?
<2> you don't have to redo the list of file descriptors each time you call it
<2> or masks
<10> eh
<0> yea. you'd think you'd save a lot that way. but you don't because reading ram is just as costly as writing it. and poll struct entries are 64 times bigger than select entries
<0> poll saves you a bit when you don't have very many sockets getting activated. but when you're under real load select and poll meet at about the same level of scalability.
<2> makes for a simpler program
<2> that's why I use it
<0> well poll() would be better if there was a void* in there to keep your own custom structs.
<0> otherwise you still need to build your own lists. so it doesn't really make your code any simplier
<0> i think it just boils down to personal preference. do you like bit setting with macros or do you like structs. choose your poison:)
<11> or maybe the performance gain of either isn't really going to affect your program
<0> that is probably more right:)
<13> I just used "gorram" in conversation
<13> *sigh*
<0> freak
<2> you have to stop watching repeats of firefly
<13> My friend was like "a what?"
<13> It only repeats when I press play.
<2> too bad the pricks killed off that show
<13> Whih happens often
<2> it was just getting going
<2> they put it on after midnight here
<2> bastards
<2> I ended up downloading them all
<13> Same
<13> I want to get the DVD
<13> and Serenity, too
<2> missed a lot of them when it was on the bull**** box
<11> i bought the dvds a few weeks ago
<11> it's sad that it got cancelled :(
<2> I borrowed the dvd of serenity from a local video hire and he went broke and closed up the next day. so I still have it
<2> overnight hire
<2> that was a few months ago
<2> things are so ****ed here that even they can't survive
<2> lots of businesses are stuffed now
<2> stuffed == ****ed
<2> the government here has finally succeeded in creating an undercl*** to be cheap labour. that won't help
<13> What
<13> The ****.
<13> The guy gonna hire me go an take a vacation ...
<2> what happened?
<2> I wouldn't trust that
<13> My friend just checked his calendar
<1> HACKER
<14> hakar!!!11
<1> your hacker friend shouldn't be checking other people's calendars, it's wrong.
<13> zid_: Uh, it's a public calendar. They work together
<1> yea right, HACKER
<1> I should go to bed, it's early
<1> OrngeTide: night
<1> ..***y
<15> Anyone here use Nero to burn DVDs?
<15> How can I make a WMA & MP3 disc?
<8> any lex/yacc guru's here?
<1> I know yax
<1> and lecc
<8> heh
<13> kawfee: What do you mean?
<15> aedinius: I want to make a DVD that has MP3 and WMA files on it and I want to filter out the protected contect WMA files. YOu can do this in nero for cd writing by making a wma/mp3 disc.
<15> I'll just do a data disc. I didn't want to do that though.
<13> Hm.
<13> I thought there was a similar thing for DVD
<15> Yeah, that's what I want
<13> I can do MP3 DVD and WMA DVD
<1> WMA DVD???
<13> Yeah
<1> WMA is worse than a 20 year old VHS for quality, why would you want it on a dvd
<15> Yeah, I can do a WMA or a MP3 but I can not do a MP3 and WMA disc
<1> I'd love an xvid player
<15> Oh well, I'm doing a data disc. I guess I'll have to seperate my MP3's and WMA's
Return to
#c
or
Go to some related
logs:
#winxp
remove passeord
#computers
#goal
#mirc
canon i960 photoshop
#computers
lolw calorie
#microsoft
#computers
|
|
