| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Comments:
<0> my SPARC gets 15.66
<1> perhaps i should find a SPARC instruction that increments something and takes the same number of cycles as a nop
<1> and use that instead of nop
<1> aedi: can you paste me the sparc program? i want to run it on mine
<0> And my PowerMac gives 0
<0> Damn.
<2> t
<0> http://igotallthe.info/~drew/bogomips.c
<1> thanks
<0> counts the number of adds
<3> no, it's just wrong to increment global var
<1> oh
<3> you get all kinds of memory delays
<0> Yeah.
<3> it *must* be register var
<1> aedinius.. double check the asm for that in dbx
<0> dbx?
<1> make sure it's doin the right thing
<1> yeah, or gdb or whatever
<1> yeah you should use a register
<1> if youre touching memory toure ****ed
<1> s/toure/youre
<1> you might be able to get the compiler to do it by declaring the variable by this, but it's just a hint so youll have to verify it in a debugger/dis***embler: register unsigned long var asm("%l1"); /* uses sparc register l1 */
<0> Damn. Yeah, it touches memory.
<0> ld [%g1], %g1
<0> add %g1, 1, %g1
<0> st %g1, [%g2]
<1> that works in gcc and sun workshop, afaik
<1> or you could just write it all in ***embly
<0> That sped it quite a bit
<0> 4082.361288 mips
<1> just have your program do this: mov %g0, %g1 1: add %g1, 1, %g1 ba,a 1b
<1> i think
<1> and before that, do the signal handler/alarm setup
<1> i dont know if that delivered signal will clobber %g1 tho
<1> oh well.. i'll have to actually look at this in a bit and write something
<1> brb
<3> hmm, how do you print register variable in signal handler
<3> porblem
<0> Hey, what does this mean?
<0> movl(%eax), %eax
<4> **** knows
<4> AT&T is nasty
<4> mov [eax], eax I'm guessing
<5> move what's pointed to by eax into eax
<4> looks like a segfaul waiting to happen
<4> err yea
<4> mov eax,[eax]
<6> what ack said and it should work fine
<0> ack, it does it twice in a row
<6> uhm
<5> double indirect
<6> yeah, prolly
<1> aedinius: att syntax uses the offset(base) notation instead of [base + offset, and with (%eax), the 0 is simply omitted
<1> err instead of [base + offset]
<6> yeah, you could write it like 0(%eax)
<6> but no point
<3> aedi: this is your site ?: http://igotallthe.info/
<0> Yes.
<0> One of them.
<0> Why do you ask?
<3> "SCIENTISTS ESTIMATE THAT 50% OF INTERNET SITES BELONG TO SOMEONE AEDINIUS!"
<0> Heh
<0> igotallthe.info is a neat bo
<0> box
<0> cpu0 at mainbus0: mid 8: RT620/625 @ 125 MHz, on-chip FPU
<0> same for cpu1
<0> yay! sd0: sync (100.00ns offset 15), 8-bit (10.000MB/s) transfers, tagged queueing
<0> That's not just a web server.
<7> hard disks are cheap
<0> DNS/DHCP/VPN/Apache
<8> Is the following a good precaution if you don't have an antistatic bag: wrap in paper, then put in a plastic bag
<0> It only does local DNS though
<0> Edam: I usually just put it in a plastic bag.
<0> like OMG cl*** is over
<8> Intriguing
<0> bbl
<8> kbye
<3> Edam: what is your problem with static, that your skirt will stick to the *** ?
<3> just don't wear synthetic skirts
<8> Right yeah. I'm gonna go eat now, bye
<9> or wear a slip, duh
<10> mornin'
<1> hiya
<4> hi2
<11> hello
<12> lo.
<11> I hate the cable company...
<13> Doesn't everyone.
<11> we can't get digital tv without a set-top box (converter) which will completely defeat the capabilities of any cable-ready TV we happen to get, requiring the TV to stay on channel 3.
<13> Mark, well, that sort of makes sense, you know.
<11> kidart: It's frustrating...
<13> Mark, since your cable-ready TV is, well, not a STB.
<13> You have the option of "analog" cable, right?
<11> because for most of the channels, our TV would do just fine.
<13> If you don't, then it is annoying. If you do, you don't really have much to complain about.
<11> kid: the specialty channels are all digital.
<13> Well, that makes sense too, you know.
<11> there aren't many of them...
<13> And yet.
<11> the problem is that it's annoying that we have to use a blasted box for ALL the channels just for the sake of one or two
<13> Why not put a splitter before the box, and hook the TV up to both analog and digital?
<11> that would require two splitters, wouldn't it?
<13> Why would it?
<11> Well, one signal splitter and one A/B switch, actually
<13> No, no switch. Just a splitter.
<11> er.... how's that?
<13> Because your TV has several inputs?
<13> And you can hook the STB and the direct analog signal to different ones?
<13> Hook the STB up digitally, say?
<13> Or doesn't it have any kind of digital output?
<11> It only has one cable input
<13> What, the TV?
<11> yes, the TV.
<13> How old's the TV?
<11> brand new.
<13> Well, then it should have some digital inputs in addition.
<13> And the STB should have a digital output of some sort.
<11> No, it does not... it just has a coax output.
<11> for channel 3.
<13> And that's it?
<11> it's the stupidest thing in the world, I know...
<13> How old's the STB? :)
<11> 3 years.
<13> Oh. Well, get a new STB, then.
<10> any of you play muds?
<11> I don't think the cable company has changed them.
<13> Check.
<13> Over here I have the exact setup I described - the STB is connected to the TV with SCART, and the analog signal is split before it gets to the STB, between it and the TV.
<13> The RF signal, rather.
<14> Gambit-: takes too much time
<11> hmmm....
<10> aet, yah
<10> i'm just looking for someone with experience to glance over a db schema and see if there's any gaping wholes in it.
<10> er, holes
<11> hmmm.....
<11> is sony or toshiba the better brand for televisions?
<0> Gambit-: I can!
<15> Sony if you want Tech. right away but dont care about quality
<10> aedinius, have you played any muds at all?
<15> toshiba if u can wait on the tech and want quality
<0> No ...
<11> hmmm
<11> the toshiba tv has surround sound but 5w/channel, the sony tv has 10w per channel but no surround-sound...
<15> thats why god created DTS Recievers...
<11> DTS?
<15> so we dont use built in surround sound on tv's
<0> Built in surround on a TV doesn't sound like it surrounds.
Return to
#c
or
Go to some related
logs:
#online
babycock pics
ubuntu pc97 sound
#windows
#heroin
#beginner
#nhl
irrsi beginner
#computers
#cph
|
|