| |
| |
| |
|
Comments:
<0> ewww @ klux's spoof
<0> * Dns resolved fed.gov to 0.0.0.0
<1> lol
<2> lol
<0> so hackerish aren't we nowadays
<1> right
<0> gonna get the fbi up in here
<1> its from a ghosted server
<0> it could just be efnet ?
<0> fed.gov = no such domain
<0> nm it does exist :P
<1> lol
<0> #secure Illegal channel name
<3> lol
<4> Die young. Die virgin. Use Linux.
<5> hummm
<5> t1
<3> w3b
<6> does anyone here familliar with the bsd license? I want to make a prog with some libs that is bsd licensed and sell it, is there anything I must mention? am I allowed to do so?
<6> it would be proprietary code...
<7> ThePhanto
<7> yeah
<7> most licenses will allow you to do that
<7> even gpl under som circumstances
<7> but the major diff is that with the BSD licence you do NOT have to distribute the src
<7> with the program
<6> do you have to say that part of the program is licensed under bsd or alike?
<7> the bsd license requires you to mention it afaik
<7> i havent written anything under in a long time
<7> but i know there are companies writing commercial software under it
<6> I guess I'll have to dig out the license and try to understand it :/
<7> easier than the GPL
<6> gtg
Return to
#bsd
or
Go to some related
logs:
#redhat
#gentoo
wget -r excluding filetypes
#cisco
#computers
#beginner
TWindowsMediaPlayer+info
transparant proxy centos
#politics
#stocks
|
|