| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3
Comments:
<0> is there a free ASP dev environment available that would test compile and give basic level error reporting
<1> Tcalp: ASP pages are interpreted, not compiled, and testing is usually done using IIS on localhost
<2> shhiieeett
<3> fist
<2> of fury
<2> of the northstar
<2> full of dollars
<2> that drunk girl over there p***ed out on the couch
<3> fistingfiles
<2> yeah i like word ***ociation games
<2> Response.write ("<% =giftbox %>")
<2> would that work?
<4> you should try it
<2> er yeah might give that a shot
<5> hello people
<5> I was wondering about the use of Response.IsClientConnected. Someone in our team added a check on that property in an include file which is interpreted before anything else on each post. This is because every time this script gets interpreted, it's for running huge SQL queries that will generate a report and we don't want the IIS process to launch the execution of such queries if the client has closed it's browser or navigated t
<6> I don't think it means client in that sense
<6> actually it may - I never used it cos it was marred by issues
<5> k
<6> you'll find quite a few if you google
<5> I was just worried that what this guy made was just pointless
<5> because I was asked to validate if his approach was good prior to proceed to put that on production servers
<6> I think generally it won't hurt
<6> but wether it will do anything is questionable
<5> I think it's pointless due to the fact that, this verification is made on each post... if the user clicks the button to launch the report, the verification occurs in the next milliseconds on the server and right after this, the SQL gets executed so, this stuff would be usefull ONLY if the user closes or navigate to another page during the few milliseconds after his clicks, right?
<7> surely something which does nothing but is coded anyway does, by its very nature, hurt the software
<7> they call it bloat don't they ?
<6> if it's a short process there should be no need for it kramer
<6> if it occurs every page hit it's surely too short to justify it
<5> well, the guy added this to prevent huge queries to be fired if the user closed his browser...
<5> I don't get how it could be helpful to check the Response.IsClientConnected before executing the SQL since the check AND the execution of SQL are performed AFTER the user click the button to launch it
<5> the user would have to close or browse away BEFORE the interpreter to hit the Response.IsClientConnected check if I got that correctly
<5> so it's pointless in my view
<6> it's a good point
<6> it's useful if you have a lot of queries on a page multiple processes
<6> if it's one long process then it needs to be async to benefit
<5> yep
<6> this is perhaps why I've never used it nor been advised to 8)
<6> the other aspect is if it's an asp loop
<6> so every loop u can check it - it has uses there
<5> especially in my caee, the guy added that check in a seperate include file which get interpreted each time a post is made, so the verification occurs only at the very beginning of each requests...
<6> right
<6> fairly pointless then
<5> ah I don't question the usability of the property, it's just the guy's approach I'm not sure about
<5> hehe
<5> well, thanks guys for the "collaborative thinking" I guess I've pinpointed a potential issue before it happens
<5> hehe
<6> ok, stop sounding like a project manager now :P
<5> hahahahaha
<5> I'm not, I'm a software developper who is doing chores others don't want to do under a small 3 months contract...
<7> heh, if he were a project mamnager it'd be alll AJAX this, Tag that, roll-your-own everything. On-demand, faster, cheaper !
<5> god I can't wait this hell to end...
<6> hehe
<5> at leats, they just sent me a new report development task...
<5> :D
<5> but I miss .NET development so much... what are your profession guys?
<7> php ;)
<6> run my own dev company
<6> pretty much 100% .net
<5> great
<5> I am a freelancer, I own my own software dev company as well
<6> cool
<6> we do a lot of B2B - software integration and the like
<5> mainly .NET but you have to earn money to live so right now, I'm doing cl***ic ASP support and Crystal report/SQL dev/support as well
<5> nice
<6> yeh what we're finding is clients who come with asp3 stuff we just rip out and redo in asp3
<5> 2 months remaining until the end of this contract, I'm already on the lookout for another one
<6> very few cases where it's worth supporting 3
<5> ya
<5> .NET 2.0?
<6> or do new dev in .net and work side by side with 2
<6> with asp3 rather
<6> yeh
<5> nice
<5> are you alone or you have employee/***ociates?
<6> 3 of us in the company, all directors
<6> looking to employ this year
<6> jumping from small company/home offices to medium size
<5> ok and what type of .NET licence you got? Pro or enterprise?
<6> vis studio you mean?
<5> sorry, yes
<6> pro atm, looks like we'll need to upgrade soon though
<5> hehehe yeah, probably
<6> the other devs I work with are 100% monolithic devs coming from asp3
<6> I'm more enterprisey
<5> ah
<5> I was considering buying the pro version since im alone in my company
<5> so I guess it's a good choice
<6> one of the reasons we might need to go team system is for the souce control integration
<6> but then I guess u can buy vss on it's own too so we'd look at that
<5> yeah, and believe me, it's quite useful!! I use that in my current contract and it's very nice
<6> well it's actually a new toy - vss used to be terrible
<5> VSTS is really great!! especially with the sourcesafe integration
<6> other source controls are good but clunky to use for .net
<6> yeh
<6> we don't often have more than 2 devs on one project at any time though at the moment
<5> eh! even VSS is sometimes a hell with .net
<6> so working from a network drive is feasible
<5> yes but for project management and priority management, VSTS is really something!
<6> aye
<5> where are you based? USA?
<6> uk
<5> oooh!! nice!!
<6> hehe
<5> in that cool part of UK where there's no taxes? :)
<7> hah
<6> lol, jersey? nah ;\
<7> we'd never be that lucky :/
<6> uk taxes ****
<5> I think it's called Pays-Bas in french (im based in canada)
<6> specially with this government
<7> they sure do
<7> at least we aren't in a skandinavian country
<6> I thought pays-bas was wales
<6> they have taxes
<7> their taxes are criminal
<5> hmmm
<6> ye I know a few scandis
<7> I'm in wales
<7> and we get taxed to the hilt
<5> The Rolling Stones have evaded the fisc by basing their home office there so I heard
<5> that's why I asked
<6> it's prolly just the welsh not being able to do math properly.... ;D
<7> :O
<5> maybe there's no taxes for foreign enterprises?
<7> you better no be a scouser ;)
<5> lol
<6> hehe, soz mate - I have to rib the welsh whenever possible to confirm my englishness
<5> hell no ;)
<7> g1bz: 'tis the way of the world
<6> I do of course expect a full apology for charlotte church though
<7> I'd prefer she was bruned at the stake
<7> which, incidentally, would be an inferno given the body fat she carries
<6> lol
<6> I never had much against her til she started a chat show thing
<6> like every other little wench
<7> I've always hated the common slapper
<6> anyhows got work to be on with ;\
<6> l8rz
<7> me too :/
<5> later guys and thanks for the help
<8> how can I replace < to < but not if there's object after it? (like <object...)
<6> regular expressions and forward lookahead
<8> can you help me with the regular expression
<8> ?
<6> with bits yes - I'm not writing it for you
<8> thanks...
<9> I'm just picking asp up and I can't place any sort of debug function
<9> something to dump all my data to a readable format
<9> in php you'd have print_r() if that helps
<10> "all my data"?
Return to
#asp
or
Go to some related
logs:
#nhl
#windowsxp
#c
#nhl
oqoprpima
#nhl
#winxp
how belive civil unions are wrong ?
#computers
#hardware
|
|