@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8



Comments:

<0> if my mine were "J ", fscanf if "%d" would do what?
<1> fscanf would return 0, I imagine
<1> and probably not advance the file pointer
<0> http://72.86.96.239:13111/img4.txt rather
<0> so there's my file
<0> now how the crap should I account for that/
<1> thought you were going to read into a string, and then read intot he array
<0> decided, since it looked like this was working, to do it this way
<1> ha, you fool! ;p
<2> I lub that Burger King comercial, where the Jr whopper has a blonde, and it appears she's giving the jr whopper a BJ, or do I have a dirty mind? ;)
<1> could probably call gets if you hit a line where fscanf returned 0
<1> but would need a buffer
<0> if I had "-110 42 102 #stuff here", using "%d %d %d" would ignore the crap at the end, yes?
<1> or, could call fscanf with just a %*s, but I forget how you'd make it not ignore whitespace
<3> yeah, once it reads the 3 integers it could be followed by romeo and juliet for all it cared
<1> it would read in the 3 numbers, and then sit there pointing to the #stuff here



<0> rather, if i had that stuff in a string
<0> i could then just overwrite it on the next line, and go abouts my merry way?
<0> yep, that'd do it
<0> so now I just need to be able to read until \n
<0> ideas?
<0> fgets()?
<0> ah, that'd do it
<0> eads characters from stream and stores them in string until (num -1) characters have been read or a newline or EOF character is reached, whichever comes first.
<0> R+
<3> if you're using fscanf() if you put a \n at the end of the input string it works the same way I believe
<0> ahhh, looks like this is working now
<0> let's try with a more complicated file
<0> **** yes
<0> that'll do it
<2> umm, FuIru, isnt this why ppl perfer iostream? ;)
<0> ah, I love you ****in guys
<3> bleh
<3> have to do a fade in and fade out on a title
<2> I never liked std c, atleast we were allowed c++ libs
<1> I know I prefer iostream in cases like this, heh
<0> thanks again guys- ya saved me a lot of pain
<0> and now, after 39 straight hours of awake work, I sleep
<1> heh http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=171
<2> sign of the times I guess....
<4> hmm... sleep...
<5> Re_Boot
<5> I have a letter to the editor sort of thing you should read
<5> but you may make it your life's goal to ***asinate me (if you havent already) :
<2> MaoTseTongue I like the contrversy between us, gives me an a reason to rag you
<2> btw, whats your physical address? ;)
<2> listen, MaoTseTongue, as I was saying yesterday, there is so much bs for politician no wonder why we cant elect exceptional leadership, since exceptional leadership generally has a IQ that registers above a shoe size
<5> lol
<2> no one with a IQ would WANT to run for a office.
<5> that may be true
<2> besides, if your back on a bush bash, tell me of anyone that would of done a better job, Hillary?
<1> as Carlin says, "Garbage in, garbage out."
<5> No. Kerry or Gore
<1> "The public ****s!"
<1> Ronald Reagan's monkey friend, Bonzo? heh
<2> heh, riot, welp, Gore did create teh internot
<5> so tru
<2> and kerry would just lay down and take it in the ***
<5> oh pleeeease
<2> he would, you think hillary would allow him a doggy treatsy? ;)
<5> lol
<2> see, my point is valid, WHERE is the GREAT leadership?
<2> besides, 911 was a bad hand of cards, you had no choice but to play them
<2> regardless, there was no plan of action in place to deal with such events
<2> is that bush's fault?
<6> yep
<2> what about clinton, he knew there was problem, he ordered a "failed" bombing attempt on Osama
<6> according to pentagon officials, that never happened
<6> it was made up
<2> democrates had a chance and played dumb
<2> thats called a cover up
<2> wink wink
<2> so, Osama has been a ungoing issue, no other president truely dealt with
<2> besides, democrates, republicans, there all the same lot, mindless bickering
<2> point is, this country does have real issues that real ppl have, that real leaders need to resolve



<2> I say vote the mall out, get a gr*** root campaign to get career politicians out of office, they are evil "."
<2> s/mall/bums
<2> people should never vote party line, they should vote with thier concious, who they truely feel would work for the ppl, and not for thier bank accounts.
<7> good luck with that
<7> that's like asking a guy not to smile in a strip club
<2> well, until ppl start using the thinking part of thier brains.....
<7> yeah.. i mean i agree with you
<7> don't get me wrong
<7> it's just a hopeless cause
<7> there's too many people that really don't care for anyone else
<2> if they say "I will do this" then dammit they should do it or be casted out with the sodomites! ;)
<7> i agree
<2> dam, Ann Richards died, I like her persona
<6> voting your conscious is a great way to never, ever get your legislation p***ed though
<6> annoying when 'reality' sets in :p
<2> I hear ya
<2> I really feel that they way the goverment is set up, the beuarcracys involved, that it leads to party line disagrements, and a broken country becaause of it
<2> we need only 1 part, the american party, with many choices to choose from
<2> get rid of the partys system
<2> vote or electcted officals, majority wins the vote
<2> s/or/our
<2> then let the ppl control who they let in to vote
<2> if they campaign and say they'll do "this" they better do "that" or be casted out
<2> accountablity
<2> also Im for term limits
<2> to many well educaated ppl in this country to be forced to settle for the same old crap, term after term
<2> bring in new ideas, from great leaders from the public sector
<3> and age limits!
<3> we don't need 90 year old senators
<3> the roman empire is gone
<2> dont know, can they bring what the ppl want to the table
<2> if so, let em
<2> old values have also stood the test of time
<6> the primaries need to go
<6> our government shouldn't have official parties
<6> if Random_Group_A wants to have 'sub-elections' to determine the one and only one candidate they'll "allow" on the ballot
<2> Im not saying new ideas arnt good, but, look at how modren socioty and its industrys have eveloved, shouldnt our political system also evolve into a more representive idealism of the ppl?
<6> fine
<6> people can do that on their OWN time
<6> get people to go vote in their internal election
<6> let em rent the polling stations
<2> well, I think ppl in Texas, shouldnt tell ppl in MA how to run there show
<2> nor would we want MA in our affairs
<2> so, regional ditricts ofcource
<2> districts rather
<6> kinda like how its setup :p
<2> and stll hold a city,county,state levels of goverment including fed
<6> of course that doesn't solve issues which might fall under 'universal rights'
<2> but, just do away with party lines
<6> I suspect the 'lines' would just be harder to see
<6> but still be there
<2> hell, if the ppl vote in 100 leaders that all think the same way so be it
<2> but, hold them accountable
<2> this country needs to look at thier voting records, did they say one way and do another, vote them out, send a message to washington saying WE WONT TAKE IT ANY LONGER!
<2> to many countrymen that care about this country, that will stand by what they say, that have great leadership skills, vote them in.
<2> btw, for the most part, bush has done what he said he would, or attempted to implement changes to have congress and the senante vote otherwise
<2> but time for new blood
<6> see thats where the party system helps em though
<6> okay you voted for person 1
<6> they went back on their record
<6> next election, person 1 is the only person in the party who's running
<6> and person 2, your essentially only other choice
<6> could be promising to vote specifically against the issues you think are important
<6> so you either vote for the guy who SAYS he'll vote your way and doesn't
<6> or vote for the guy who says we WONT vote your way
<6> good choices eh?
<6> guess you can help the guy who won't vote your way will go back on HIS word too
<6> hope*
<2> welp, just like corperate america spends oodles trying to hire good ppl, the same should be done finding good ppl for office
<6> ahh yes
<6> spending oodles on our politicians, bound to improve the pool :p
<2> plenty of political science majors out there
<6> eh, few of the people I've worked with minored in poli-sci
<6> you dont want them running a starbucks


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #vb
or
Go to some related logs:

SQL special charcter quote
#kl
#allnitecafe
#allnitecafe
Vampire Chics
#php
Angeline Muahahahahaha
southpark dreidel.mp3
#india
cerryred



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes