| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3
Comments:
<0> bleh, my gf come round to see me like 10mins ago
<0> and now shes asleep on my bed
<1> wasn't there an excellent video of their windows getting smashed as they tried to drive away on their bus
<2> you dont need roofies on your gf you ****nut
<0> lol
<3> Doh_: yep, somewhere
<1> oh the comments are good
<1> Did you know that when scientists research something and the result is not what they expect it to be, they just throw it out of the final report? So really, how credible are these "scientific" studies? So please do "shut up"
<2> lol ffs
<1> http://www.buy.com/prod/us_modular_4gb_quikdrive_2_0_usb_flash_drive/q/loc/14982/10381026.html?adid=17662
<1> http://www.buy.com/retail/Product.asp?sku=203472830&adid=17662
<3> yowzhers
<3> for $25? excellent
<3> I do need to upgrade my 256meg one
<3> although, realistically, 256 is usually more than enough
<1> i have a 4gb one on my keychain
<1> that 2nd link was ~$65
<1> with a $60 rebate
<1> unfortunately looks sold out
<1> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16820208093
<1> 4gb $32
<1> nm, everyones complaining its slow
<1> http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/S/SUPER_BOWL_SNICKERS_AD?SITE=TXABI&SECTION=ENTERTAINMENT
<3> pfft
<3> If they can take a cock in the ***, they can take a little, humerous advertisement
<3> yes, you can quote me on tat
<1> the commercial was rather stupid though
<1> they shoulda pulled it just for being stupid
<3> Agreed
<2> as a scat fan, i find it offensive also
<3> as a scat fan, your opinion is useless
<2> eat ****!
<2> oh, nvm
<3> well that didn't help his case any
<1> [12:33] <Paratus> The more I use .Net the more I want to shift all my projects to it..
<1> hear that Saww?
<1> http://www.tgdaily.com/2007/02/07/amazon_tivo/
<3> should be interesting
<1> http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070207/tc_nm/videogames_vision_dc;_ylt=AvqsVEHIAHb2cCFyDiXoPozMWM0F
<3> that article should be sent to every middleschooler with an eamil adress
<1> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,250711,00.html
<4> Is there any way to dynamically set the fill method for a typed dataset in vs2005?
<3> dynamically set how?
<4> well I'll tell you the whole issue i guess
<4> I am making a data management system for one of the departments at the university of maryland, they have an access database, I am developing a front end that provides a lot of functionality and makes sure they don't screw anything up
<4> data input and output works fine, but they also want crystal reporting
<3> naturally
<4> the issue with that is that they want to be able to change the location of the database they use, so in turn it cannot be set at design time when designing the reports
<3> sure
<4> so I made a typed dataset to do the job
<3> typed how?
<4> actually added a cl*** to the project
<4> but the select statement to populate the dataset to be used in the reports changes based on user input (sort of a report builder I designed), so I want to be able to set the typed dataset adapter's fill method at run time instead of design time
<3> and you can't just call .Fill() ?
<4> you can, but you can't specify the select command for the adapter like you can for a generic OleDbDataAdapter, so .Fill() will just get all of the records in the dataset
<3> This is one thing .net has against it
<3> there are too many damn ways to do the exact same thing
<4> this is true
<4> hmm actually I may have found a work around, i can fill the typed datatable using the typed adapter, and then use the table's .Select() method to filter out what I want
<3> This'd be a lot easier without trying to do any designtime selectcommand crap
<3> there'd be no issue switching databases in the first place, since a connection object doesn't care where the database is
<4> I did try that, but something didn't work...maybe I'll give that a shot again
<4> because it definitely should work
<3> I've never done any of the design-time database crap. I found it taking too much control out of my hands, and it just didn't work well at all
<3> I deal strictly with a dataset, a connection, and a command object, and that's it
<3> all interchangable
<4> I agree, I didn't make this abstract enough at all
<4> but I was kind of thrust into the project without much .net experience
<3> that'd be a good way to get around it- abstract it a bit
<3> ideally, you'd want to be able to toss the crystal report a dataset, and it does the work needed to visually prepare the data
<3> that report shouldn't care where the dataset came from, if it was sql server, oracle, access, etc, or the location
<4> yeah what I also tried was making a dataset, and writing the schema to an xml file, using that xml file as the report's data
<4> but the issue with that is some machines apparently write xml differently, so it worked on my machine and not the client's
<3> certainly shouldn't do that
<3> XML its self is completely independent of environment
<3> it's just flat text, after all
<3> two different ENGINES could create differently structured XML, sure
<3> What wrote the XML? your app?
<4> yeah I just did dataset.writexml()
<3> ***uming it was using the same data, that should certainly come out the same way
<3> and using the same framework version
<3> i've never played with .writeXML myself, so I could be mistaken
<3> Why not just give the crystal report the dataset its self?
<4> at design time you mean? or p*** it using report.SetDataSource?
<3> Well if you plan to change the source, you can't do it at design time
<3> Besides, that's the same as hardcoding it, and you never want to do that
<3> sure, ***uming .SetDataSource accepts a dataset or similar
<3> anywho, i gotta run, but as a suggestion, try to abstract it more. and get away from doing design-time data binding
<4> yeah right now I'm trying to design the report with no datasource, and p*** it one in the app
<3> it'll just lead to trouble
<4> yup thanks a lot
<3> good luck
Return to
#vb
or
Go to some related
logs:
#kl
divorced females in bangalore
#chat-world
#chat-world
#c++
#linux
wht is birdflue
t
artlusion
Vampire Chics
|
|