@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10



Comments:

<0> @search 4 ft in lbs
<1> Search results for ft in lbs:
<1> FOOT POUND (ft. lbs. or sometimes, ft.lb.) -> http://tinyurl.com/jjhg4 [autorepair.about.com]
<1> Conversion Calculators - Convert ft/lbs to Joules - Chapel Steel -> http://tinyurl.com/m8247 [www.chapelsteel.com]
<1> Impact Wrenches deliver up to 117 ft-lbs of torque., Milwaukee ... -> http://tinyurl.com/oxdt9 [news.thomasnet.com]
<1> Horsepower vs Torque -> http://tinyurl.com/rz4dd [www.newton.dep.anl.gov]
<2> would someone send me a notice please
<2> thank you
<0> you're very welcome
<3> :>
<0> http://users.design.ucla.edu/~akoblin/work/faa/us.html
<0> check that **** out
<0> quicktime, bewarned
<0> http://www.aaronkoblin.com/work/faa/
<0> that's the main page
<4> where's a webcam go when you plug it in on fedora



<5> heaven
<4> lol
<0> i give up
<0> i've scoured google for 2 hours and every single data provider i've found is $499/mo+
<0> but i've gathered how it's done, with an airband receiver that decodes ACARS messages from planes to the airline
<0> yet all of them elude "data is direct from the FAA", but nothing on the FAA site even remotely suggests that data is generally available
<0> flight position information turns out to be just like TV listings data, "generally available" to a selection of paying vendors that can mark it up for the general public
<0> my FOIA request for TV listings data was rejected
<6> jedzilla, you're a nerd.
<0> well
<0> i wanted to write a python script that would show me the shows i wanted to watch and when they'd be on in the next week
<0> and generate an XML file that would feed my DVR
<0> impossible
<0> the tv listings data is supposedly publicly available, yet how is completely hidden
<0> there's one site that offers it distilled and through a SOAP interface, but it's intentionally distilled for some reason and you have to renew your key every three months
<0> even the best open-source solutions scrape web sites, it's ridiculous
<7> xmltv?
<0> okay folks
<0> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Virtual_memory#Contradictory_lead_and_sections_.28Split_Suggested.29
<0> I'm "Jed S"
<0> let's review the discussion
<0> comments ending with JS(talk) are mine
<0> am i completely out of my mind here?
<8> In php, can I use a while(true) with a break; inside?
<0> Mick_Fanning: yep
<0> #php: this is the comment that pissed me off
<0> Jed, I'm going to revert your entire contribution, as you introduced some brutally bad factual errors, while also removing factually correct and relevant information. Swapping is a -completely- incorrect term to use w/r/t Windows NT in any form. If you don't know that, frankly, you shouldn't be writing about virtual memory on Microsoft Windows. -/- Warren 16:31, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
<0> it is my understanding, since i know everything
<0> that every windows version made swaps
<0> am i nuts?
<0> discuss.
<9> sup ****as
<8> Is that right?: (I want the while loop to be broken) while(true) { if(condition) { break 2; }}
<0> Mick_Fanning: "break" will work fine
<8> or I should use just break?
<8> ah ok
<8> jedzilla even if I have one if inside other, inside while
<0> break as far out as you need to
<0> while() { while() { /* need break 2 here */ } }
<0> break does not apply to ifs
<8> allright :)
<8> ty
<8> ah okay!
<7> jedzilla, what's wrong with xmltv?
<0> poutine: it scrapes
<0> poutine: did you review http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Virtual_memory#Contradictory_lead_and_sections_.28Split_Suggested.29
<7> no, but looking at it I agree that virtual memory is not swapping
<0> look at warren said to me
<0> i don't know what i'm talking about
<0> this coming from a windows vista beta tester
<7> I don't use wikipedia much anymore due to the quibbles
<7> jedzilla, what's the easiest way of making _BASIC_ API documentation from source and header files in visual c++ express
<7> like doxygen without the comment vars
<7> hmm, I might be able to work with this xml file
<7> probably not much better than writing a manual parser though
<0> hmm
<0> xml docs?
<7> I see "XML Document Generator"
<0> i only use xml docs for "Object Browser" and intellisense
<0> i haven't produced any API libraries that have made me dump a file from it



<7> how do you generate basic API documentation?
<7> for a project growing in size
<7> for a quick reference
<0> i've heard good things about http://ndoc.sourceforge.net/
<0> i don't know if it works on c++
<7> Do you do much C++?
<0> very, very little
<0> i'm mostly C and C# when it comes to C
<0> i can read it but i don't know the STL at all
<0> s/STL/runtime/
<7> Is it better to have a blank default constructor using Cl***::Cl***() : mNumSomeVal(0), mNumOtherVal(0) { } than one which takes 1 or 2 arguments with a default such *** Cl***::Cl***(int mNumSomeVal = 0, int mNumOtherVal = 0) { }
<7> I mean, is it better to have both than just the second
<0> i do overloads in C# on the constructors
<0> a la
<0> Constructor(Specify1, Specify2)
<0> Constructor(Specify1) /* Specify2 defaults to null */
<0> Constructor()
<0> if i'm extending ApplicationException, i'll : the base constructors in
<0> like
<0> cl*** MyException : ApplicationException { public MyException(string message) : base(message) { } }
<0> i don't know what the style consensus is on that
<0> i find the : foo(1), foo(2) syntax real ugly though, personally, but what i find ugly doesn't necessary disqualify something from necessary use
<7> All in this C++ book written by Bjarne Snoustroup he talks about how exceptions are the cure for all C's memory ills, yet I'm reading everywhere to avoid them like the plague
<0> c++ exceptions are terrible
<0> .net/c# exceptions are the holy grail
<7> yeah, templates are ugly too, so are iterators, and all sorts of stuff, but they are still useful
<0> exactly
<0> i was disappointed they kept C++ templates syntax for C#
<0> Dictionary<string,IComparable> quidditch = new Dictionary<string,IComparable>();
<0> that just doesn't look right to me
<7> C++ references are also confusing
<10> that's C++ template syntax?
<0> that's c# generic syntax
<0> which is effectively c++ template syntax
<10> that's java's new generics syntax too
<0> Dictionary<T,U> is a cl*** provided by System.Collections.Generic
<10> i love generics
<0> you can get real creative with generics in C#, like, U has to be a value cl***
<0> yeah, me too, i think the syntax could use work though
<5> generics rules.
<10> i dont know how to make it any happier though
<7> Everything.Should.Not.Be.A.Namespace.Or.An.Object.holy****()
<10> what would you suggest?
<0> i'm not sure
<10> and is .NET going to try and pick up enclosures like java is apparently trying to do?
<0> enclosures?
<5> moving from java 5 to 1.4 is like a step into last century
<5> which i think it is
<0> like, the .. um .. python things?
<0> i can't think of their names
<0> continuances?
<0> what the devil are they called
<10> i've not read much about them, but they'd be somewhat like routine literals that can be p***ed as parameters
<10> kinda like php callbacks using create_function, but more built in rather than all namespace hackish
<0> oh, yeah, those are python things
<0> and i'm not sure, i heard musings they were supposed to be in .NET 2.0, but i'm not sure
<10> js has them too. not entirely sure how java plans on actually making any reasonable use of them
<0> you can pull it in python with something like
<0> my_sort_func = lambda a, b: a >= b
<10> yeah
<10> but python is also not strongly typed
<0> that would be the trouble
<10> it loses much appeal when you still have to account for an entire method signature just to make the compiler happy
<0> http://blogs.msdn.com/abhinaba/archive/2005/09/17/469568.aspx
<0> there's someone's thoughts on it
<10> but i'm a big fan of syntactical compiler contracts like interfaces and generics
<5> does .net for webapps work like java?
<0> apparently it's supposed to be in C# 3.0
<0> .NET for webapps is ASP.NET
<0> which doesn't work like anything i've ever seen
<5> you have to use just asp.net?
<0> yes
<5> that's gay


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #php
or
Go to some related logs:

#india
nicklerim?
#india
photoshop error 93:-8
BERİL.JPG
#chat-world
#allnitecafe
#allnitecafe
#chat-world
aapachi



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes