| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Comments:
<0> i was watching american idol one time and without realizing it
<0> i wrote a four-line-long list evaluation
<1> and was like "are there penguins in our code?" and he was like "...what?!"
<0> that worked on the first try
<0> like, my subconscious was typing while i was laughing at the retards
<0> and then when i was done it was like [[[[([(]]]([])))
<0> and i was like got damn, it's a miracle!
<2> mwahahaha, reading all the posts on slashdot about a mac actually getting hacked. it's funny reading all the excuses the zealots are using to keep their view of the world from collapsing in on itself.
<1> yeah
<0> to_upload.extend([("%s/%s" % (q, z), [(t, os.path.getmtime("%s/%s/%s" % (q, z, t))) for t in os.listdir("%s/%s" % (q, z)) if not os.path.isdir("%s/%s" % (z, t))]) for z in updir[1]])
<0> there's the beauty
<3> so like, this guy calls up our partner company wanting programming added to his lovely site. He's all like "I got all the HTML done, just needs programming to make it work! I even learned HTML and wrote it all myself. It's great code!"
<0> i typed that subconsciously
<2> funniest was "shell access = root access"
<4> metallic: i know i'll regret this.. but do you have a link?
<1> The compelling reasons for me to use a Mac: It's GUI is beautfiul, it has better software support than Linux, it has a BSD kernel, and it works good.
<2> Two-Bits: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/03/06/1446207&threshold=3
<3> So, they take it, look at the code he wrote and it's like "OMFG, how the **** does this even work. It's almost worse than front-page!"
<0> threshold 3 for the win!
<4> gui? beautiful?
<2> Zenethian: the exact reasons i'm buying one. i have no illusions that it is absolutely secure.
<1> I wanna start out small
<1> with a mac mini
<0> best comment:
<1> now that they've been intellized
<0> "why keep ssh on? that's one of the first things you turn off to secure a machine"
<1> oh dear god
<1> well, actually, maybe for a desktop machine that's slightly true
<1> but still ****ing funny
<0> it's disabled by default in os x
<0> iirc
<0> It's a Mac. You don't _keep_ SSH on. It's disabled by default. You have to turn it on deliberately.
<0> yep, i was right
<3> I keep sshd on for my desktop
<3> it's no mac though. can't afford that stuff.
<4> metallic: i'm speechless
<4> "Also keep in mind that it is incredibly difficult to properly configure a Unix system to be completely secure against users with shell accounts."
<4> might as well s/Unix/Windows/ s/shell/nt/
<1> yeah
<4> or remove them entirely
<0> http://rm-my-mac.wideopenbsd.org.nyud.net:8090/ssh
<0> ahahah
<1> I have ssh enabled on my desktop
<0> that explains it kids
<0> close the article now!
<1> for when I need to get in from outside
<2> if it's unix, i have it enabled :)
<5> i don't think i'm going to do any more work day
<5> today
<2> i should get back to programming sometime soon.
<0> oh neat
<0> slashdot taught me the sudo hack
<0> sudo vi, inside vi :!bash, whoami will say 'root'
<0> hooray for sudo!
<0> So SSH was on and accessible? Dumb move. Like saying "I dare you to steal my jewelry from my bedroom -- oh, and my house is unlocked with the windows open."
<0> But maybe people WANT something to be stolen. Many years ago, the garbagemen (sanitation workers) in NYC went on strike, and garbage was piling up in the streets. A relative of mine in Brooklyn still managed to get rid of his: he put it in big boxes, wrapped the boxes in gift paper with bows, and left them in his car with the doors unlocked. They always got stolen.
<0> ^ gold
<4> jedzilla: as is mentioned in the article, privelege escalation is still an important concern
<3> I've had to use vi and other tools to get a shell before.
<6> Taljing about apple4a
<4> all that would be left otherwise is to find an exploit in a running service. escalating the privelege of the underlying local account would be the next logical step
<3> Not through sudo or anything, but the thought would have crossed my mind if I came upon such a situation
<4> jedzilla: er.. sorry. apparently that was a quote
<6> Are you guys talking about apple?
<6> Well??
<5> we're talking about your mom
<4> sho nuf
<2> ;and specifically, what she can do with an apple in her anus.
<6> So who is the apple zealot in here saying its not a problem?
<5> does fiber harden or soften poo?
<6> Soften
<4> Zenethian was voted scapegoat of the day
<1> yay
<1> I am not.
<1> we were just talking about the goofy apple zealots
<4> and today, you're it
<6> Just have to wait for 5 more minutes
<6> Then I can go poo
<4> your sphincter on a schedule or something?
<6> I'm a caregiver and she's in therapy
<6> Sitting in my car
<2> hrmm, weird. i'm using xmlHttpRequest and POST, but all the form variables arent in $_POST
<2> they are in $_GET...
<1> uh
<2> lol, even though $_SERVER["REQUEST_METHOD"] returns "POST"
<0> gotta love php's strange behavior
<4> metallic: querystring data goes in $_GET regardless
<0> xmlHttpRequest + POST != QUERY_STRING
<4> you can have both. make sure you're p***ing the data in the request body though
<0> unless he's giving a URL with a ? on it, he shouldn't be getting any GET
<4> .send("foo=bar&meh=blah&etc=boobs");
<0> well yes
<2> jedzilla: I am, but i still expected it to be decoded.
<0> hm, weird
<4> you sent a POST request with an empty request body. querystring data is just a part of the url and really has nothing to do with a GET request
<4> other than it's the only typical way to send form data with a GET request (aka, sans POST)
<4> i quite often use both
<5> This information is provided for information only.
<5> uh
<5> k...
<4> i want to stab every person who's ever included such a disclaimer (with or without the retarded redundancy)
<2> i'm going to be a rich mofo. i now have website search.... with ajax.
<4> dun dun DUNNNNN!
<5> oo score. i'm set to make $55 a month off my money market account
<2> meh, i think i'll get paid for doing absolutely nothing useful today.
<5> yeah
<5> i've been reading digg for the past 3 hours
<2> lol.
<2> my boss is out of the office.
<5> that's abotu $100 in my pcoket
<2> only $75 in mine :(
<5> my boss is ***igning me stuff, i just don't feel like doing it :P
<2> i guess i should be doing j2ee. extra $8 an hour. well... technically i'm on salary damnit.
<5> yeah, me too.. but i like figuring out my hourly wage
<5> heh. actually, i usually figure it out to an 8 hour day.. and i never work 8 hours
<5> except today. i'm leaving
<7> anyone here use bt?
<7> bt = bluetooth
<3> nope
<4> on occasion, why?
<7> having issues
<7> how do I set the BT p***key on my laptop
<2> well, we've known you've had issues for years.
<7> issues with bt
<7> not
<7> THOSE issues
<2> lol
<5> wow. some digg people are really idiotic
<5> on a thread about the first web browser:
<5> i doubt it could handle flash, let alone a whole page.
<5> WHAT AN ASTOUNDING CONCLUSION
<1> the first real popular web browser was Mosaic
<1> but I don't even think it was the very first one
<8> lynx for me
<5> nah, it was WorldWideWeb
<1> yeah
<8> folks were text browsing in academi before gui browsing
<1> and gopher browsing too
<2> and porn browsing
<1> gopher was interesting. it is such a backwards model to what we have now
<7> bbs + porn
<1> in terms of search engines.
<1> since gopher sites had to register with Veronica to be found and used
<1> heh
<1> funny stuff
<1> bbs's were still ling
<1> er
<1> king
<1> where else could you play LORD
Return to
#php
or
Go to some related
logs:
#india
joeyski
#chat-world
#india
#india
asprotect ske unpacking
#kl
#allnitecafe
#netcafe
#allnitecafe
|
|