| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Comments:
<0> haha
<1> wow this license manager I made is nifty
<2> hehe... sweet
<1> it's ****!
<1> WHY THE **** DOES IT HAVE TO BE SO STUPID
<1> IT DOESNT EVEN WORK RIGHT
<2> It always amazes me when girls are shocked/surprised that guys think with there ****s when they shouldnt be. Males are instinctively doggish. It's just a fact of life!
<1> are you a faggot?
<3> woo hoooo
<3> ubuntu RAWKS !
<4> ...
<5> why is that, you loaded kde and thought it was ubuntu's fault?
<3> man, this is cool
<3> XD
<5> you should try freebsd and cvsup ;p
<5> total dominance
<3> this SERIOUSLY rawks
<1> observe gentlemen, a fanboy in the making
<3> XD
<3> hmmm, everything is kinda tiny tho
<3> i need to increase the size of this display
<5> you're lame
<5> you're using unix for gui
<5> the only reason unix is better than windows is because you can do everyting without overloading the cpu with gui
<5> BSD is conquers
<5> heh
<3> yeh, 800 by 600 is working much better
<3> yeh, i used to think like that
<3> but then, i realised that there's no fighting a gi
<3> *gui
<3> i do web development for crying out loud
<3> can't exactly do that in console can you
<5> well what is the point in a apache server where gui takes up more ram on it?
<5> shouldnt you dedicate ram to services? rather than guis you dont really need?
<5> if you need gui, then buy a seperate machine and install windows
<3> i have another pc for my server
<3> this one here is for day to day stuff
<5> yeah but i bet you use gui to manage your services
<5> and those guis will crash your machine one day
<3> : /
<5> or/and compromise its security
<3> good point
<5> i use ssh to manage my services ;p
<1> dev workstations almost require xfree or xorg
<3> ok, gaim is being noisy
<6> how will a gui compromise security?
<5> messaging apps that come with it, that you will probably want to use
<5> which open ports on your sad **** server machine therefore
<5> and you might run vnc crap also
<2> what's the syntax for a reverse ORDER BY ?
<5> which is a security nightmare
<1> I somehow doubt Coke_N_Code has his machine on a T1 or higher
<3> ammm, i don't think most folks would do that at work
<3> hey !
<6> Etobicoke27m: ORDER BY field DESC
<3> i could have a t1 :(
<3> :/
<2> ahh yes... that's right... thanks!
<1> bitch
<3> lol
<6> un1x: you don't need a gui to run messaging apps
<5> most people who use a gui have irc or msn crap on there
<5> servers should be seperated from guis
<6> so what? i have never seen a bad vulnerability for IRC
<5> yeah right, i own your ip, you'r server is as 99% less secure than it was
<3> lol
<6> ..
<3> yeh, i never use irc at work
<6> my server is 99% less secure because you have my ip address
<6> right.
<5> Coke_N_Code, then what is the point of your gui on your server?
<5> if you dont run stuff like msn
<5> heh
<5> and games
<3> this isn't my server
<3> a server honestly doesn't need a gui
<3> i guess
<3> if you can set up the stuff without it
<5> well yeah, clap clap
<3> i'm really impressed with ubuntu
<5> dude you are looking at kde
<3> un1x, you're on bitchx or something ?
<5> any unix can run kde
<5> i'm on windows xp
<5> gui
<3> not just that
<3> i'm talking about apt-get
<3> the packages it came with
<3> the ease of installation
<5> apt-get is 100% lame
<5> and unreliable
<3> the lack of stuff that i don't need
<5> why would you be impressed?
<3> etc
<5> most people hate apt-get
<3> well, there's always the option of NOT using apt-get
<3> it's not like they force you to use it
<5> or there is an option to use a real os such as solaris or bsd?
<5> rock solid server elite
<5> where everything comes switched off as default :E
<6> why would most people hate apt-get?
<5> because it doesn't work at all
<5> perhaps?
<6> it doesn't?
<5> nope
<6> it's worked fine for me for years
<5> its insecure and it doesnt work
<6> what doesn't work about it?
<6> and how is it insecure?
<5> its a linux package manager
<5> must i explain myself?
<5> heh
<6> uh, yes?
<6> how's it any more insecure than having me download my own packages?
<5> ok then, investigate on google how many exploits for previous version of linux kernel to gain root directly in 1 minute independent of services?
<5> come back to me when you find out the number: more than 10,000
<6> and what's that have to do with a package manager?
<5> its a linux specific application?
<6> so?
<5> so you'd have to be somebody who doesnt care about security to run linux.
<5> maybe you share your root with 1000 other people without your knowledge?
<6> ..
<6> what does that have to do about the security of package managers?
<5> you're probably somebody's botnet
<5> heh
<3> i don't want to be somebody's botnet ... :/
<5> then you'd need to run a os that script kiddies find too cryptic to learn and therefore exploit
<5> bsd
<5> or solaris
<3> so script kiddies learn about ubuntu ?
<3> :o
<6> shrug. i'm running linux kernel 2.6.1
<3> man, i really think people are being too liberal with the term 'script kiddie' these days
<6> as long as the daemons i'm running are secure, i really don't see a problem
<6> nobody (not even me) has physical access to the box
<3> how lame is this, my best saturday night in weeks was spent setting up a dual boot ...
<6> also, bsds have a package manager
<6> does that make it insecure?
<5> most script kiddies don't know bsd dosnt even alow root access by default, from outside the box its installed on ;p
<5> heh
<5> they give up when they try to install, cause they have to partition everything with fdisk
<3> doesn't ubuntu also have root disabled by default ?
<5> i dont know, i hope so
<5> for your good
<3> what's with all the FUD dude ... ?
<6> un1x: let me guess, you read slashdot?
Return to
#php
or
Go to some related
logs:
#india
auzzie tabs
mary roalman finish
write.czm
gadisjelita
#chat-world
#india
sikmekistiyorum
#chat-world
#india
|
|