@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14



Comments:

<0> As far as I know, yes.
<0> But lsmod doesn't list anything using the driver for me to figure out what loaded it.
<1> then you don't need to know what loaded it
<0> I do need to know where it is loaded from, though
<1> maybe some other hardware, or maybe your nic loaded it, but it only needs configuration
<0> I have to know what loaded the driver.
<1> why
<0> So I can p*** options to it.
<2> k thx heaps
<0> (when it is loaded)
<1> modprobe loaded it
<1> lol
<0> How did it know?
<3> p3nguin: Is it listed in /etc/network/interfaces with dhcp?
<3> Actually, that shouldn't load the driver, should it. n/m
<0> I don't have that directory/file, anyway.



<4> onjoin cikgu_iddas
<3> Is there any other /etc/module* at all?
<1> try unloading the module with modprobe, it unloads then modprobe loaded it
<1> if*
<2> is there an easy way to piss of gnome and use kde if both are installed (i am new at this, i know)
<2> without like
<2> doing anything stpud
<3> piss?
<2> get rid of
<3> For what distro?
<2> 7
<2> rh
<3> Hmmm. That's quite old.
<1> breadfan01: manually edit your /etc/X11/xorg file and set your default session as "startkde"
<2> yeh
<2> well so is the pc
<1> right whythehell ?
<3> Al-Ashtar: xorg?
<0> RH 7 didn't havef X.org!
<3> Al-Ashtar: On RedHat 7?
<0> hmm
<1> that's why I said "right whythehell ?" because I'm not sure, lol
<3> Easiest, if it's for single user, is to write startkde to ~/.xsession I would imagine.
<0> If it is using startx to start X, then it's ~/.xinitrc instead.
<0> I think 7 didn't start GDM automatically.
<2> 'unable to open display'
<0> Does it have xf86config command?
<5> fx86config
<2> sec
<5> I think 6.2 did
<0> Somewhere around there they used a different command.
<2> has xf86config
<0> I just can't remember was it is. It's been a long time since I used RedHat with xfree86 on it.
<5> that should work
<5> works with slackware
<0> Not after 10.
<0> Not even 9, if I remember right.
<5> I use 9.0
<0> Maybe 9.1 was when they moved to X.org.
<0> I can't remember.
<6> unable to open display can be any of a zillion things, as it just means an unrecoverable error.
<0> I'm using Slackware 11.0 right now. (In unreleased form)
<6> The most common error is missing fonts. Check your xf86 log in /var/log
<5> I didnt need it after 8.0
<7> guys
<7> can you do me a favor
<1> what kind of favor :/
<7> err can someone send me EICAR test file via email?
<7> just gonna test if my AV will catch the thing properly on mail
<7> http://www.eicar.org/anti_virus_test_file.htm
<1> ?
<0> Why can't you do it?
<7> no, it seems my mail server does detect it:x
<0> Then you know it works.
<0> Why do you need someone else to do it again?
<6> Nobody is going to send anything like a virus to you over email.
<7> no, what i want to find out is not the mail servers AV capabily but my installed AV software
<1> lol
<6> Not here, because if I catch them doing it, they're never coming back here.
<7> jblack: no its not, its eicar
<8> hello



<8> i'm new here
<8> have several questions
<1> do it yourself
<8> to ask
<1> shoot
<0> I would send the test, but it's pretty much pointless.
<7> pls do pls do
<0> Even if I wanted to, it wouldn't go past my server anyway.
<8> how to clear event log area in FreeBSD?
<0> k_e_r_b_e_r_o_s: You'll have to go to #FreeBSD to find out about that.
<0> Considering this is #linux.
<2> grr this one is gay as, anyone suggest the best linux distribution to put on a really old crap computer?
<0> An old version of Debian, probably.
<7> p3nguin: is it already sent?
<2> k cool ty
<1> raster^: create a yahoo mail account for your testing
<0> al-ashtar: That's a good idea.
<1> I know, I always give good ideas
<1> like this xorg on rh7 idea
<1> heh
<7> Al-Ashtar: yahoo wont let p*** that attachment :o
<7> not a good idea
<1> try gmail or any free mail account provider
<7> gmail wont do as well,
<7> both uses Symantec
<5> use your smtp or sendmail
<6> If you search the internet for "free email", you'll find 20,000 people that will give it to you.
<6> But we don't allow that sort of activity here for about a half dozen reasons.
<0> Why are you concerned about p***ing the test pattern if you know it gets blocked?
<9> Hi.
<6> One, is its bad practice to allow people to shuffle binaries around like that -- even if its for "tests", because nobody knows whether or not you own that email address.
<0> Read your howtos for securing the server, do what it says to do, be happy.
<6> Second, that binary doesn't have source available, so the person sending it wouldn't know its just a test.
<0> Is the test even a binary?
<6> At least one of the files is, yes.
<0> bad bad stuff, there.
<0> When I test my av I use the included test files with the scanner. That way I know what I am putting in my computer.
<6> If you weren't the recipient, and it was a false test (I.e. a website masquerading a real virus as a pretend virus), then its a felony in countries such as the U.S.
<0> ClamAV has test files for its own scanner.
<10> does anybody know any suse repo in the internet ?
<6> Even if you were the recipient, but it was an office computer, its still a felony if the company chooses to press it.
<1> I would upgrade my ClamAV version but this is the latest for ubuntu as a binary, and I don't want to put up with deps
<0> Not only that, but you could have to pay restitution to repair the company computers, fines to the government, as well as other possible sanctions.
<1> WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
<1> WARNING: Local version: 0.88.2 Recommended version: 0.88.4
<7> p3nguin: you talking about the risk that may cost me doing that test?
<6> Which is all some of the reasons as to why I will ban for life anyone that does a test like that.
<0> raster^: We're saying that sending viruses or virus hoaxes across the internet is not legal.
<0> That's why my server blocks viruses.
<6> Oh, it can be.
<6> You can send anything to yourself that you like.
<1> yes, that's the only way it's legal
<5> well you can send them to mcafee and the like too
<0> I don't need any liability like that, so I keep my ClamAV up-to-date.
<6> Nope. That violates other laws (copyright infringement)
<5> but I would never ever send a virus knowingly
<11> is there any stats about this channel ?
<7> anyone here using gmail?
<6> They can be generated for good reasons.
<7> does gmail inform users if someone send someone with an infected message?
<5> for good reasons
<5> lol
<1> heh
<1> that's it i've made up my mind. I'm switching to debian when itch is released
<0> *sigh* I've gotta get to bed, I'm about to drop.
<5> I cant due to wake in 1 1/2 hrs :( meh
<7> DR_DaTA: whats your work bro.
<5> they can wake me when they need me at my desk tomorrow
<5> auto claims
<7> ic
<5> specificaly sobrogation through the other ins co.'s for what we have paid out
<6> Al-Ashtar: Good to hear. :)


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #linux
or
Go to some related logs:

#allnitecafe
TK MASKS
#php
'isinf' in vc++
#allnitecafe
zhi sao hai you ni
t
rpm pxscan linux
#kl
BERİL.JPG



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes