| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Comments:
<0> but not like the free beer thing
<1> i c, so have license for a year, rigth?
<0> i am not novel salesman
<0> but most stuff should be GPL'ed
<2> Novell charges for SusE.
<3> there is openSUSE if you insist on using SUSE and not paying for it
<1> i c
<1> i m already working with windows for few year, must learn much bout linux
<1> specially bout the security
<1> but i still cannot find out which the best linux at all
<4> nothing from NOVELL is free
<2> You dont need any fancy stuff for that. And to quote some noname " there is no best linux".
<4> or bug FREE heehe
<1> lols
<4> the best linux is one that runs good and SUSE runs great most of the time
<1> there's no free lunch rite
<5> best linux is different for every person
<2> the best linux is the one that you like, i think slackware is the best, wanna start a flame war? :)
<1> yes, red hat n suse is mostly heard in good performance
<5> i think gentoo is best (i'm quite sure of it)
<3> ubuntu rox :)
<2> lon3ly_9uy: You can get whatever linux distrobution, just download something and try it i mean worst case scenario you download and install some other distrobution.
<4> I have red hat at work and SUSE at home - they both work ok
<1> deegan: good idea, i'll do it
<6> I am biased towards Gentoo :)
<1> does linux have user security like windows server to log onto?
<4> linux can run smb nfs file shares
<4> usually if you can dream it up, somebody has code around somewheres
<1> samba can shares, but don't have such strong security
<7> heh
<4> ill take that snippet
<7> spox You're funny :P
<8> hey all!
<9> ha
<9> i just watched that last night too
<4> NO
<9> YES
<9> :)
<10> ...
<10> lon3ly_9uy, what do you mean about Samba shares and not having security?
<1> klb: not really, i found out it only can secure by allowed host/IP
<1> means, someone knows IP address can breakthru it, rite?
<10> what do you mean "breakthru"?
<10> You can have share permissions, and you can set ACLs on the actual files
<10> in fact, I run several samba servers that are members of Windows domains and have permissions just like they would if they were on a Windows share
<1> what is ACLs?
<10> access control list
<10> like "domain users:read" "bob:read/write" etc
<1> i c
<1> can do so? i'll try
<4> ACL? good grief
<10> rocket625?
<11> Hello everyone.
<12> hello
<13> sup
<14> hi all,
<14> is there a tool that i can use to open the windows compiled help .chm files in linux
<5> i think KDE help opens them
<9> kchmviewer
<9> for kde at least
<14> thanks
<12> archmage too.
<9> looks like there's gnochm for gnome too
<14> do i need to install them manually or they alereday there?
<11> xchm also works
<5> depends on the distro
<5> but most probably you have to install them
<9> i'm guessing probably not
<15> the kernel from ubuntu edgy only boots graphical mode when fglrx modules are isntalled
<15> is there any way around that?
<16> Hi all
<12> Hey Al!
<16> hey lacroix
<16> W***SSSSSSSSAP
<12> My friend was in KSA, he did a car accident. He killed 7 camels.
<12> It's a miracle he's still alive.
<16> LOL
<12> No guardrails, no fences, no security safety devices.
<16> I'm happy he's OK
<12> Be carefull in Kuwait.
<16> usually it doesn't turn out that good
<12> thank you
<12> That's what they told him, when it happens it's fatal.
<16> when you hit a camel on it's feet, it falls on top of the car (usually crushing who ever is inside)
<12> That's exactly what happened.
<12> I saw the pictures, you wouldn't believe he's still alive.
<17> hi, how can i easy compile an application written in objective-c for linux?
<6> I remember using something called ocaml when building mldonkey
<6> maybe its that
<16> I'm really happy for him
<12> Hello Simple
<9> gcc compiles objective-c
<16> and you're right, there is no security measures for those type of things
<12> Thanks Al
<15> Be Right Back
<16> they could at least put a sign of camel crossing
<17> well, but this app uses some libraries from apple...
<17> and i don't know if it will compile well...
<6> Hi lacroix !
<17> it uses cocoa, and i need to port that app to something like qt, or gtk
<16> **** I forgot to buy something for wife, tommorow is valentine's :/
<18> Al-Ashtar: well, go to the local toy store... :P
<16> hmm
<16> what should I get her ?
<19> greetings.
<19> I am really frustrated, been struggling for two days: I keep on getting "Warning: Unable to open an initial console" right after my kernel boots, the machine "runs" but has no login prompt (i.e. console). I have initial console on serial port compiled in the kernel. :-(
<16> Greetings, Earthling!
<20> well, first of all, why do you want serial console? :)
<19> furrywolf, it's a headless SBC, no keyboard, no mouse, no speaker, no hard drive, you get the picture...
<19> one kernel works, the latest 2.6 doesn't, and they (re)moved some config options <sob> so the whole /dev and udev setup doesn't work at boot time to find /dev/ttyS0. What *really* irritates me, is that it CAN write to the console that it CAN'T write to the console.
<20> hrmm, yeah, that would be annoying. heh.
<20> I can't help much there, then... never played with serial consoles.
<19> oh, well, just thought I'd throw it in here ;) Thanks.
<21> Myrddin maybe this helps you: http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Remote-Serial-Console-HOWTO/
<19> Thanks GuAliCho. Just took a squiz, they explain up to kernel 2.5 and I'm using those exact settings in the latest 2.6. This seems to be a 2.6 issue as 2.4 worked fine (on the same hardware)
<20> and I'd imagine that source code is a bit long to take a look through...
<19> that is plan "b", but tomorrow being monday, deadlines for projects don't include kernel hacking (I wish) <grin>
<21> did you take a look at "non-standard serial port support" in the kernel options just below Virtual Terminal option?
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
#chat-world
#vb
#linux
#allnitecafe
wine folder access privilege
congigating verbs
#chat-world
Discribe Pune
#india
#india
|
|