| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Comments:
<0> not going to happen
<0> that i can see anyways
<1> thanks
<2> hello
<2> i am using Ubuntu version 5.10, i cannot setup my EW-7128g wireless card, i followed the instruction found in Ubuntu forums
<2> anybody can help?
<2> i badly need help
<2> i'm a newbie... trying hard to get into Linux :)
<2> is there any UBUNTU users here/???
<2> please..........
<3> any asterisk hackers present?
<4> salam
<4> sesapa bleh tulun aku
<4> berkenaan dengan suse
<5> what?
<6> hello people and good morning
<6> i have a question. does tar have self checking ? for example... i tar my folder, then i wanna check if tar wasn't corrupted or something
<6> how to do that without actually unpacking archieve
<6> and checking integrity of tar file
<7> tar tvf archive.tar
<6> that's just verbose...
<7> Since you already know how to use tar, why are you asking here?
<6> well i dunno if i can verify my tar file
<6> cuz sometimes i make backup... and when i extract it... it says it's corrupted
<8> if you don't see errors with -t it's ok
<6> dun want this to happen too often... so i should verify if tar is fine. my question is, does tar check that or not...
<6> hmm
<6> ok...
<6> lemme try this -t thingie on an already packed tar...
<6> humm what about if it's gz-ed too ^^ ?
<6> lol
<6> i know i'm complicating... ^^
<6> ahh
<6> found out
<7> I thought you knew everything about tar!
<6> np
<6> tar ztvf bin-2006-12-16--_350_.tgz
<6> hmm penguin... how would look like an error in tar file ? like corrupted tar file... ?
<6> what sentence would it contain ?
<6> or a word or sth...
<7> Speak English, please.
<6> :/
<9> try tar -tvf /etc/fstab for en example error message
<6> umm
<6> i don't think i want to touch my fstab file ^^
<7> tar ztvf will either pretend to unpack the file or it will error out.
<7> If you get no error, then it works.
<9> tar -tvf `which tar` then
<6> so: tar: Child returned status 1
<7> status 1 = error
<6> this would be a unique error for corrupted tar file
<9> not always, there are different errors
<6> well i would just grep child returned status ... ^^ no error code.
<9> ah yeah, check return status
<6> if that exists... then a file was corrupted and system will inform me bout it
<9> i hate it when www.kernel.org/git is not opening
<6> is there any limit on size of .tar file ?
<6> can it be like 20 gig's ? or so ? or more ? any limit for that ?
<9> no, but your libc may have a limit
<6> how to check that ?
<6> ulimit ?
<9> but it's always higher than 20 gb on linux
<9> some libc's have a 2 TB limit
<9> but not modern ones
<6> ah, no no, i wouldn't have that much ^^
<6> i hate it when tar -ztvf is so slow... -.-
<6> i have like 10000+ files in my tar archieve... and he's checking it very slowly i guess -.- stops by bigger file... dunno why tho... he's not unpacking anything...
<9> it is decompressing the whole file when you do -tzvf
<10> it has to unpack it to compute checksums, etc.
<9> it's gzipped, so to check if the tar file is corrupt it has to decompress it first
<6> so it's actually unpacking ? and cleaning after unpack... or doing both at the same time ?
<6> i dun want my disk usage to exceed...
<9> it's not using your disk
<7> Just RAM?
<6> just ram ?
<9> it's not unpacking the files
<9> it's only decompressing thewhole archive
<6> ok...
<9> packing and compressing are different things
<6> i understand
<6> so actually if i didn't have .gz file he would do it in a second, rite ?
<6> since it's .gz it take so long
<9> not much ram either, it'ls like a pipe with zcat | tar -t
<6> omg this thing is gonna take hours -.-
<9> i don't know how much of this time is decompressing and how much is checking correctness
<6> i see...
<6> lemme see my cpu load
<11> show us what you got
<6> load average: 1.49, 1.41, 0.86 only -.-
<6> thought it would be more...
<11> wwow
<11> how many cpus do you have?
<11> that's a high load
<6> i have 4 cpu's
<11> oh
<11> that's a low load
<11> heh
<6> hehe
<11> what kind of cpus?
<6> 4 cpu's 3,2ghz and 4gb ram... xeon processors.
<11> ah
<6> actually 2 cpu's but hyperthreading...
<11> ah yep
<6> so it counts as 4
<7> Only in your world do two CPUs count as four.
<6> dunno why it doesn't put more load... it could go faster i guess...
<6> penguin that's what they told me here on this chan...
<6> they are probably better than 4 ^^ hehe
<7> Effective processing power does not additional CPUs make.
<11> lies!
<9> it's probably at 100% already if you see "top"
<11> thank you yoda
<11> stress -> anger -> doobies -> twinkies !-> incongestion.
<6> 1 2GH processor is better than 2 1GH... i guess....
<6> forgot z's
<6> ^^
<11> i prefer 2 x 1gb
<11> ghz
<11> better load balancing
<6> well it's not that fast tho.
<7> My crappy server has four in it. I think I want to sell it and get a dual instead of a quad.
<6> it's slower than 1 2GHz...
<11> yes
<9> your os can make a better balancing
<11> that's a given
<6> 4732 root 16 0 2884 448 280 D 13 0.0 1:08.05 gzip
<6> huh only 13% for gzip...
<6> are processes equal by default or is there qos by default on serv ?
<11> equal by default
<6> like http has advantage against gzip
<11> 'equal'
<6> then why my http gets more cpu than gzip ^^ should be equal ^^hehe
<11> some processes may tweak their own 'nice' value for priority
<6> not that i'm complaining
<11> and it also depends on your kernel scheduler
<6> but ... still if they are equal...
<11> as to what gets more
<6> ahh 2.21 is load now ^^
<6> getting up slowly ^^
<11> capacity!
<9> core meltdown
<6> meltdown ?
<6> it's falling now... the load... strangely... -.-
<6> http://www.bshosting.org/stats/ that's the serv stats.
<6> and btw
<6> is it possible to check how much % is each cpu using ?
<6> or is it same on both always...
<11> should be able to
<11> somehow
<11> maybe there's an acpi event for it
<9> it's not the same on both
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
#india
theweirdone
#kl
#linux
#allnitecafe
#india
tamde teens
#php
phillipine currency
/usr/src/kernels/2.6.15-1.2054_FC5-i586
|
|