| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Comments:
<0> ... sigh
<1> I didn't say it's not doing it. I asked you if you think it _is_ doing it.
<0> I don't know why you guys are being so arrogant about everything
<0> I may not know the details of linux networking.. but that doesn't mean that I don't know about networking in general.
<1> Mostly because I already told you how to take care of this and you haven't done it.
<0> it doesn't matter if you did or if you didn't
<1> And yes, I think you have no idea about networking in general. You've already shown me you have no clue.
<2> well, first of all, ndiswrapper really ****s. don't use it. secondly, if your wireless currently works, there's no reason to mess with it. thirdly, your driver has very little to do with the problem, it's the configuration program you're using.
<0> I've done plenty of networking in my time..
<0> I've had a frustrating day of being sued for something I had nothing to do with and dealing with legal ****
<1> If you are making a wireless connection and you think you are connecting to a router, I honestly think you have no clue.
<0> excuse me for not being able to think clearly
<1> I'm not blaming you... I'm trying to help you.
<0> Making a wireless connection?..
<2> p3nguin: if case you haven't actually looked in a store lately... they all say "ROUTER" in big letters on both the packaging and the unit itself.
<0> I'm already connected to a router.. wirelessly.
<1> lol
<1> furrywolf: Just because I write Human on your forehead doesn't make you a human.
<0> It's not my fault that a router ALSO has wireless capabilities
<1> routers don't have wireless capabilities.
<2> so users are justified in calling every box to do with connecting things together a router, since that's what the manufacturer does. :)
<1> See above.
<0> well what I'm saying is theres no need to be technical when it does't change the situation at all
<0> just to make someone feel dumb.
<0> a wireless router, in the way they are advertised.. works a a router.. and a wireless access point.
<1> Feeling dumb is your own choice. I'm trying to teach you.
<2> Lanlost: correct. but you've also not listened to anything you're told... for example, I think I've said about 3 times what you should do. :)
<1> furrywolf: You mean change the program to something that works? Yeah, you told him three and I told him two!
<2> p3nguin: exactly. heh.
<0> no, I agree with that
<1> So go ahead and do that.
<0> I was just saying that the way you speak is very insulting to anyones intelligence
<1> We'll wait.
<0> regardless if you helped me or not.
<0> blah blah
<0> so just let me cry about it
<2> actually, it's through two switches. my mistake. :)
<1> Router + switch + wireless access point = router? lol
<0> ...
<0> so since I cleared the buffer
<1> Alright, buffer is cleared...
<0> all you guys have told me to do is change the program to something that works..
<0> ...
<0> .. such as...
<1> I actually told you more than that, but you didn't try it yet.
<0> yeah I was awaiting an idea of what that might be
<0> if you haven't noticed.. google isn't the exact greatest place to search for broad terms like
<0> "fantastic programs to replace networkmanager"
<1> I honestly don't mind if you use that program as long as you can bring up the wireless device and make the connection.
<0> ... I am connected already
<1> Once you have made the wireless connection, stop touching things.
<0> .. I've been connected wirelessly this whole time
<1> Then, pull up your command line...
<1> su to root
<2> p3nguin: one of my computers connects to both the cable modem and the lan, doing NAT and serving IPs. into that I have plugged a switch. into that switch is another switch and a hub. plugged into the second switch is a wireless router unit, that also does nat and hands out IPs. as I said, ugly. :)
<3> good day gents
<1> Then configure the ethernet device manually.
<1> ugly!
<1> UGLY UGLY ugLY!
<0> "configure the ethernet device manually"
<2> yes :P
<0> .. with what..
<3> VERY UGLY!
<0> vim?.. where is the file
<1> Lanlost: Let's see here... You want to configure your InterFace... maybe ifconfig would be a good start?
<1> ifconfig eth0 192.168.2.1
<0> and thats common sense how.
<2> I could set the wireless router thingy to act as simply an access point, and not its full nat/dhcp server/etc router package, but I'm lazy, and I don't care if boxes on the wired lan can't talk to wireless ones...
<0> I really appriciate the help, but theres no need for the ****ing smart *** comments
<3> LOL. thats my wireless ap's ipaddress
<4> popeye is on a lappy ?too
<0> like capitalizing I and F as in I wouldn't understand what ifconfig stood for.
<1> Lanlost: I presume that anyone that comes in here has a basic knowledge and doesn't need me to hold their hand the whole time.
<5> Reply from 10.10.10.2: bytes=32 time=-545ms TTL=127
<0> you don't need to hold my hand the whole time
<0> how would "its ifconfig" be any harder..
<0> actually it would have saved you a lot of time
<1> Have you configured the interface yet?
<6> heh
<2> klb: guesses would be two boxes on the same IP, or you're using a usermode linux.
<0> uh huh..
<5> that's a windows machine pinging another windows machine across a vpn
<2> dunno then :)
<5> weird.
<1> Now you need to create the NAT across the interfaces.
<0> Let's see here... you want to configure your Irc Client.. maybe iconfig would be a good start? lol!11."
<3> Lanlost, Why dont you invest in a 60 dollar atheros wireless card to knock one of those routers out.
<0> thts basically how I took it.
<2> the only times I've seen negative pings are when two boxes try to answer, or a UML runs out of ram. (no clue why they do that... but they do)
<0> because I have no need to do that.
<0> I'm going to have this problem fixed in two days anyway
<1> Great, then my time here is useless.
<0> no.. I didn't say that.
<5> furrywolf, not any big deal.. I just thought it was funny to look at
<3> p3nguin, aggreed
<0> <1> Now you need to create the NAT across the interfaces.
<0> ill shut the **** up if you will just finish
<1> Arsenios: You agree I'm useless? Thanks for the support, buddy.
<3> LOL
<3> p3nguin, Smart ***.
<1> Lanlost: You'll need a few iptables commands to create the NAT. Give me one moment while I get the commands.
<3> iptables -I INPUT -p all -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT ; iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
<1> iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING -o ra0 -j MASQUERADE
<2> Lanlost: I bloody already told you what to do here. this is why you're getting attitude from people.
<3> cept my ethernet is eth0 yours may be different Lanlost
<1> iptables -I INPUT -p all -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
<1> Arsenios was almost exactly right.
<1> Now we have to also make sure that ip forwarding is enabled.
<1> echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
<1> That enables ipforwarding.
<1> I typically reserve eth0 for my local side and eth1 for the internet side.
<5> hey, who let nullcode in here
<7> i did
<5> oh
<7> should i leave ?
<5> nah
<7> =)
<5> as long as you don't start singing in the bathroom
<1> Lanlost: If you have a "router" instead of a switch, simply ***ign a manual/static IP address to the WAN/Internet port in the same range as your eth0. 192.168.2.2 would be an example.
<1> Now you'll have two NATs instead of the single one that is required.
<2> all of which he's been told before, of course...
<1> Of course
<8> furrywolf, one quick question. I'm reading the file using mmap but I'm not sure what type the array should be. I thought it should be char, is that correct?
<1> furrywolf: Were you helping AtSquiggs earlier with this topic?
<8> if you're not in the mode i'll keep playing
<8> yep! ;)
<1> I was about to give you the "don't hilight people" speech.
<2> unsigned char * would work... void * would work too, since you'll be casting everything... don't use plain char.
<2> char can be either signed or unsigned, and it's bad to use it for data.
<2> p3nguin: heh, somehow he's decided I'm the best person do help him with his homework. :)
<8> ok thanks.
<8> well you sound like you know what you are talking about :)
<2> heh :)
<8> furrywolf, can I show you something?
<2> this isn't what I used to teach, but it's close enough...
<0> my bad
<0> sheyit
<0> I was cooking a bagel
<0> sorry I had the iptables thing done already
<8> http://pastecode.net/?action=viewpost&tag=1292
<0> its not going to screw anything up right? I had all of that done already
<0> I went ahead and typed it in again anyway
<0> didn't want it to add seperate entries to anything
<8> the image.bin is actually the file from the site
<2> AtSquiggs: firstly, your comment says it's ints... which it isn't. :)
<9> Evening all.
<8> can you tell I found a site online. Once I can read this puppy I'll be redoing the whole thing
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
#allnitecafe
#allnitecafe
#chat-world
dattiri dit dit
#allnitecafe
mileage kl to penang
#c++
#india
#allnitecafe
php +fopen +write +perms
|
|