@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8



Comments:

<0> fc stands for ****ed-up crap
<1> Al-Ashtar: you can't talk. you use ubuntu.
<2> why anyone hate fedora ...i think its cool for newbie
<1> the most worthless piece of **** on the planet.
<0> LinixNet: the one and only, my son.
<0> LinixNet: the one and only
<1> it shouldn't even be able to hold the linux title.
<3> Fedora is basically "Beta"
<1> Fedora is way more bad*** than ubgaytu
<0> LinixNet: you use slackware, so I would just waste my time telling you how good ubuntu is.
<4> I think when it comes to superiority, the best is LFS, however, to save effort, the next best thing is Debian
<2> what the hell is ubgaytu ?
<3> We can stop the distro bashing right now.
<2> i didnt start trolling ...



<1> personally i like Fedora because it's still a functional, good linux distro, but it's a very good desktop o/s being that it has many many packages with a lot of good GUIs for newbies
<2> that dude start it
<1> however.. it's still Red Hat
<4> Ubuntu is a great distro, it just targets a different population, mostly windows immigrants
<1> it comes at the price of an >8GB install though
<3> and it's a dev distro... meaning, it could break at any moment.
<1> nivek: i never had problems with it
<4> well, Fedora is not unstable, in fact, it displays more stability than Mandriva and Suse
<0> (high fives)
<3> I haven't either... but it's a bad choice for newbies because of that. If someone knows what they are getting into... then by all means, go for it.
<1> nivek: are you saying that Fedora never has a stable release?
<4> However, if the main target is stability, then the best distros are of course Slack and Debian
<1> Cognition: wrong.
<4> and i would prefer debian because of the gigantic community support.
<1> Cognition: slack is simply hardcore linux, no bull****.
<1> that's what it's been known for since day 1
<1> that's why some of us still love it, because we appreciate that unwavering trueness to linux
<1> :)
<4> LinixNet: i won't argue ...
<5> I have a weird question. I know that Linux cannot write to NTFS drives, but if one were mounted, could a Windows computer write to it if it was mounted as a network drive in Windows?
<1> MokonaSan: ......
<5> Yeah i know that's an odd question
<0> MokonaSan: linux CAN write to NTFS
<1> that's not odd
<1> that's dumb
<5> the only reason I ask it is because I have files on a drive
<1> MokonaSan: you need to RTFM.
<1> worse than just not knowing ANYTHING
<1> is coming in, thinking you know the wrong thing.
<4> Anyway, for people like Al-Ashtar, even though some of us can comprehend his fondness with Ubuntu, yet, he can't comprehend the benefits of other distros, especially those targeted for power users. That's why he worships Ubuntu, not knowing that a new distro might become the most famous, because Linux is constantly changing and morphing
<1> no
<1> Al-Ashtar is just a dumb*** at times
<0> MokonaSan: http://www.linux-ntfs.org/
<1> Al-Ashtar just like his Tonka Toys, Fisher-Price distro :)
<6> hello
<6> neeed help
<1> you need help?
<4> LinixNet: i have a feeling that you're trolling here
<1> i don't believe it.
<1> * MiRcWolF (w00t@leet.madhacker.biz) has joined #Linux
<6> i install psybnc on ma server
<1> the leet madhacker?
<6> but make comand is not working
<1> ooh, you want your own proxy, that one isn't good enough?
<0> MiRcWolF: we don't do psybncs here
<1> hrm
<6> i wana say that
<6> make command is not working
<6> how i install make in ma pc
<1> -MiRcWolF- VERSION mIRC v6.16 Khaled Mardam-Bey
<1> hrmmmmm
<1> yep
<1> this is #Linux buddy
<6> yeah am talkinga bout linux
<4> MiRcWolF: what distro
<1> Cognition: you're going to help this 'tard?



<6> linux 2.6.14.3-vs2.0.1
<4> LinixNet: stop bashing people
<0> I think he needs a compiler
<3> Shh
<3> MiRcWolF, what distro.. not what kernel version
<4> nivek: thank you, he's been trolling for a while now
<6> i686 GNU/Linux
<3> MiRcWolF, what distro.. not what processor
<4> MiRcWolF: distro, distro, as in Fedora, Ubuntu, Debian?
<0> cat /etc/issue
<6> sir its linux
<3> what distro?
<6> Debian
<3> Ahh
<6> Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 with kernel 2.6 support packages by Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> \n \l
<3> now we're getting somewhere
<6> make command is not working :S
<4> MiRcWolF: then as root, type in the terminal, apt-get install make
<3> we got that :)
<6> i did this but still same problem
<6> make
<6> Initializing bouncer compilation
<6> [*] Running Conversion Tool for older psyBNC Data.
<6> tools/convconf.c:27:19: stdio.h: No such file or directory
<6> tools/convconf.c:28:23: sys/types.h: No such file or directory
<6> tools/convconf.c:29:24: sys/socket.h: No such file or directo
<6> see
<3> Does Debian have something like "build-essential" ?
<4> stop flooding
<4> MiRcWolF: nothing is wrong with make
<6> ok srry
<3> MiRcWolF, looks like you're missing some files
<4> MiRcWolF: the problem is with you missing some libraries
<6> then what i do ?????
<7> build-essential does exist on debian iirc
<3> MiRcWolF, please don't msgflood me again.. Thanks.
<6> ok sir sorrry
<4> MiRcWolF: you are trying to install from source, but to do that, you need to satisfy all the dependencies
<0> as I've said before, we don't do psybncs here
<6> nivek what i do then
<4> MiRcWolF: i suggest you install whatever you want to install with apt-get instead of installing from source.
<6> am trying to install psybnc
<3> And we don't do psybnc.
<6> what i do sir
<4> MiRcWolF: apt-get install psybnc
<3> We helped with the make part.. it's installed.
<6> E: Couldn't find package psybnc
<3> Getting psybnc... that's up to you.
<6> but what i do sir
<6> why its not installing
<3> dunno
<6> why its show error on make
<6> nivek i can add yew user
<6> wana check ?
<3> no
<0> MiRcWolF: www.psybnc.at
<4> MiRcWolF: find repositories that cover it, or handle the dependencies by installing everything it requires
<3> The error says "no such file or directory"
<3> We said "Looks like you're missing some files"
<0> and read their manual
<3> that's as far as we go.
<4> MiRcWolF: you can see that by checking the source, you will see the requirements there
<7> try apt-get install build-essential
<0> epinephrine: make is working, but he's missing some files
<7> that package should include things like stdio.h
<6> hmm
<0> oh
<7> I'm installing debian now, old 500mhx box I want to stream video over wifi to
<7> I could be waiting for it to install for a while
<6> hey is there is any online ? installation
<6> i wana install some latest linux stuff which 1 is da best ?>
<3> apt-get update
<3> followed by apt-get dist-upgrade
<6> hmm i did this


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #linux
or
Go to some related logs:

#php
#india
#allnitecafe
russian women don't age well
#linux
#india
#kl
#allnitecafe
can't see phpinfo
#linux



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes