| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Comments:
<0> and thats the one I would have preferred
<1> As far as I can tell neither of those guarantee that there will be no difficulties with AoE if two clients attempt to write the same file simultaneously, for instance. http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8149 explicitly states that JFS would not be suitable for multiple mounts.
<0> whythehell: yeah. there is that. in fact, I really don't think there is any FS that can do that without *some* problems
<1> Well, yes there is. GFS :-)
<1> For instance.
<1> Indeed, presumably any of the clustered filesystems in this list: http://yolinux.com/TUTORIALS/LinuxClustersAndFileSystems.html
<2> anyone help me about iptables?
<3> pucink :what?
<4> whythehell, hm. You said what I've been trying to say for 30 minutes in 3 lines.
<2> i want block all port
<2> 80
<1> John_Dow_: Yeah, well I went and googled and checked what you guys were saying, and came up with a conclusion.
<2> destination all port 80 block
<2> but destination to 202.130.234.1 no block
<2> how to make rules
<2> my proxy use 8080
<5> pucink, block outgoing 80 you mean?
<4> So the conclusion is that aoe is probably not what one is looking for, unless one can run special filesystems on the devices.
<4> (If we for some reason ignore the portability problems with it).
<2> yeah outgoing port 80 block all but if destination 202.130.234.1:80 redirect to port 8080
<2> i not use transparent
<2> my client all use proxy port 8080
<6> falling in love with openvpn
<7> i like it
<8> huh?
<7> i use it for my tun-tap devices on windows
<6> I was being stupid all that time..I just forgot to add a route to the VPN subnet on my machines in the LAN
<6> and was wondering why it was not working <g>
<7> you might need a route
<9> Anyone here familiar with plesk?
<10> some can help me
<10> how i can solve Zero Sized Reply in my squid
<11> http://www.sitres.net/vacation.html
<12> uh .. ok
<13> they seem not to message the kickbot anymore
<14> they do.
<13> ah
<14> When the bot moves to a co-lo system, I'm going to beef him up a bit. :D
<14> that way, it should catch even more.
<13> simmy: he'll start messaging the bots?
<14> Might even put up TWO bots that rotate every 15 minutes or so. bwahahahahah
<13> heh, you'll end up with a chan filled with bots.
<13> your own legal botnet :D
<14> nope.
<14> Just two.
<14> ... at most.
<12> the trick is they aren't predictable. they msg you sometimes, other times not. sometimes they delay by a few seconds or minutes.
<12> +s would help. but i tried that. mlocked.
<14> fire-eyes : We've tried +s and -s .... the -s lets the DalBots in and helps with the problem, overall.
<15> you need the bot to stop cycling all the time
<12> so they still get in with + ?
<15> it needs to cycle with a delay
<14> yep.
<14> Techdeck : It will.
<12> it already does that
<15> if it cycles right away bots can detect it
<12> they still msg it anyway
<15> depends which
<15> some kinds will some kinds wont
<12> anyway i got a job to do bbl
<15> simmy, also, if it's nick will start with an 'a' you will catch it first
<15> (by it's I mean your bot)
<6> alright-msgmeforakickban
<6> :)
<15> :D
<13> aaaaaAAA-MsgMeForAKickBan-kthnxbye
<13> :D
<10> how i can solve Zero Sized Reply in my squid
<15> simmy, im telling you, you should modify my bot, it will work much better for you, and you know bash better than you do BX scripting
<13> Techdeck: your bot has backdoors in it!
<15> nope
<13> :)
<15> it has bugs..
<15> but no backdoors
<15> you are welcome to read it/test it for me :p
<13> yeah, that is what they said about Skipjack too
<15> I'm giving you the source you know..
<15> If it has any backdoors you should see them
<15> :p
<15> actually at first I thought there was a backdoor when it tried spelling
<13> Techdeck: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skipjack_(cipher)
<15> but no :P
<15> Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name.
<15> oh, it didn't catch the second )
<15> Enchanter_tim, oh cool, but where's the backdoor?
<13> Techdeck: well, that was part of a fictious story :D
<15> heh
<13> just like my claim of backdoors in your bot
<15> I see :P
<16> just like checkpoint apart from checkpoint was true..?
<15> anyways it's possible, but if it does have backdoors, I don't know about them
<16> j/k
<15> Enchanter_tim, wanna help me find bugs?
<13> welshiD: there is a portknocking secret in fw-1
<13> :D
<16> Enchanter_tim :- and you wonder why u.k. gov doesn't use checkpoint..
<16> :)
<13> heh
<13> they use the windows firewall ?
<16> lol naa they aren't that bad..
<16> some are..
<15> ew
<16> i seen them use a few different things.. anything from symantec raptors to watchguard x6000's..
<17> *yawn* alo!
<13> hello smurfer
<17> timmeh!
<18> Anyone seen a pack of trojans?!
<14> of course!
<15> did they p*** by?
<15> :P
<13> eep! did they get out?
<17> they use the backdoor?
<13> :)
<14> trojans in the backdoor?!
<14> um.... ew.
<13> thats what i got from using Techdeck's bot.
<13> (this sounds quite vulgar)
<15> bend over
<18> maseltov!
<15> hah
<17> :P
<15> nibble, mazal!
<18> bashbot is my online crush
<13> :)
<15> :D
<15> he wuvs you too
<18> so are the majority of 10gigE lasers MM or SM?
<15> eh?
<15> what lasers?
<15> what are those?
<18> haha
<15> seriously
<14> I'd think they're MM because of MM's ability to handle increased bandwidth.
<14> (if I remember correctly)
<15> ??
<17> M&Ms? lol
<18> you got it smurf :)
<14> M&M's with S&M?! What?!
<15> a laser operated network?
<15> lol
<13> hah! you are all laughing at my network :(
<14> I love it...
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
DHUDH WALA
#chat-world
#allnitecafe
bagrsak
#india
#india
#allnitecafe
#allnitecafe
#india
#allnitecafe
|
|