| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Comments:
<0> yea, i know john. i was just trying anything
<1> fearphage, atleast truss can attach to a running process. strace might be able to do the same, I'm not sure. Or use ls -lart in the directory.
<2> fear, you can't do it
<3> isnt there some user signal you can send? like with dd?
<0> ok
<0> i just decided to run it with the log option
<0> thank you
<2> fear, what are you trying to do?
<1> nibble, download pr0n!
<1> Oops, did I say that? o:-)
<2> :)
<4> bye sad childish geeks grow up and get a life
<2> heh. I considered the whole "Sun buys out OpenSSH and close sources it for $1.5m to Theo just to shut him up." Of course part of it was an agreement theo wouldn't write another SSH client/server for 20 years..
<1> Theo can't have the sole copyright to OpenSSH, no?
<1> Bah, wasn't april 1 a while ago?
<3> nibble: that would be awsome :D
<3> (especially since sun would get a lot of flak for that. theo wouldnt want to sell, and ms stock would once again soar)
<2> * Copyright (c) 1995,1999 Theo de Raadt. All rights reserved.
<2> * Copyright (c) 1999 Theo de Raadt. All rights reserved.
<2> Granted Markus, Damien, and Niels has more such in the code..
<2> and I have none.. but frankly I didn't see a need to add a bloody copyright line.
<2> :)
<2> at least not in the OpenBSD code I'm grepping through.. I'm sure I may have one or two in portable.
<2> Mostly on ****ty-*** code for SonyOS and NeXTStep
<1> nibble, is copyright void if you don't add a copyright line? There should be public archives of who contributed the code.
<1> On the other hand, the bsd license isn't exactly prohibitive about closing it, thats sort of the point. But they could just branch it and pay Theo to shut up instead of selling anything.
<2> I was always told that yes you have a copyright on your patch and you submit, but unless you are making large sweeping changes then you have no business putting a copyright entry on the file.
<2> However, copyright means very very little in most countries.
<2> You need to REGISTER IT before it has any real teeth.
<1> Register what? The copyright?
<5> I always thought copyright was implied?
<5> Like you make something you automagically have copyright over it
<2> John, Yes
<2> (ie: In the US you need to register it or you may not have much of a leg to stand on.)
<2> (EVERYTHING you write by default is copyrighted in the US.. Just enforcement is hard without a registrated.)
<1> xarius, one could argue that small changes to a project with an existing license are ***umed to be of the same license as the rest of the project, unless otherwise stated (and if you try to give away a 3 line patch with another license they won't accept it if they're sane).
<1> nibble, register it where though?
<2> John, US Copyright Office aka "Library of Congress"
<2> :)
<1> I doubt that you can count the US as most countries though.
<2> I believe UK has a Copyright office as well, france does.. anyway.
<1> And you're saying that without registering you are without protection from the copyright law?
<2> no where I said you are without protection.. I stated that if you go into a court of law it's harder to win a case.
<6> at russia, any copiright is null
<6> copyright*
<2> The registration proves that you are the first to come up with that blob of text.
<6> any software and intellectual copyright
<2> Without that the process to decide who came first.. and who stole from whom becames much harder.
<7> oh
<7> my
<7> gosh
<8> i need help
<8> i need to install sendmail
<8> can someone help me?
<9> evenin
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
stop spamming PMs in mirc
#netcafe
hindutan na
sexok
#java
#india
babra shareef
Datapacket DALnet India
#india
#kl
|
|