| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Comments:
<0> what both channels
<0> you're only in here.
<1> yeah i noticed
<2> linux: Um, ratchet down the hostility please.
<0> i'm not being hostile
<1> actually.. the problem is platform independent
<0> jblack: you told him he was in the wrong room if he wanted to discuss windows
<0> i saw you were going to sleep
<0> i was trying to keep up what you said.
<0> sorry.
<2> It's not what, but how. :)
<2> nexea: I would check the routes on the client.
<0> i'm sorry, i didn't mean to come across rude.
<0> i'm eating dinner, might be typing quick sentences.
<1> no offense taken
<1> ok, well tell me this then
<2> You can try adding a route to the target network using the router as the gateway
<1> from a purely linux perspective
<1> a computer can ping another computer on the same network
<0> yes
<1> suppose you do a.. 192.168.1.5
<3> for client == winxp ; do part #linux ; do join #windows95 ; done
<1> and your computer is 192.168.2.2
<0> Nexea: uhuh
<1> now.. suppose you do a vpn
<2> If you manually add a gateway to the network and things magically work, then either the server isn't providing the routes to the client, or the client isn't implementing them.
<1> well hold on.. sorry, your computer's ip address is 192.168.1.3
<0> ...
<1> you vpn with the server.. it gives you a ip of 192.168.2.3
<0> 1.5, 1.3, what's the difference?
<2> In linux, that would be something like... route add gateway -net 192.168.3.0 gw 66.11.22.33
<2> I muffed that up considerably, but you get the idea
<0> Nexea: uhuh??
<1> well what i am saying is that when you do a ping 192.168.2.11.. the client computer does not understand that it shouldnt route to the local ip address.. but it should go through the vpn instead
<2> So check your routing table
<0> Nexea: routing table.
<1> yes.. i am asking.. is that the default behavior?
<0> route add default gw 192.168.2.0
<0> erm, no, that's wrong.
<0> what am i thinking
<0> blah
<2> How do I know what the default behaviour for a windows machine is?
<1> wait, would it be better to just rename one of the subnets?
<0> we don't know, we don't support windows, sorry.
<1> im talking default behavior of linux
<1> forget about windows
<0> windows != linux
<0> linux != windows
<2> btw, my memory about windows issues gets a lot better after large donations.
<1> ok, from now on, when i refer to any machine i am implicitly talking about ubuntu linux
<0> implicitly?
<0> or explicitly?
<1> implicit
<2> nexea: You need to check the route list on the client. Thats all there is to it
<1> implied
<0> are you sure?
<1> yes
<0> hehe ;)
<2> And if the route isn't there, add it by hand and see if your problem goes away.
<0> i'm messing around, sorry.
<1> ahh ok i see
<2> I already told you that twice, btw. :)
<0> route add 192.168.2.0 gw 192.168.2.1
<1> i mean.. how can i edit it with say, vi
<1> surely there is a config?
<0> config for what
<3> linux > ms
<0> Nexea: man route
<1> something like /etc/ um.. /ppp/
<1> tables.conf
<2> Not really, no.
<1> hmm i see
<0> Nexea: man route
<0> Nexea: for m$ route /?
<2> Routes are typically to dynamic for that.
<1> pptpd came with proxyarp for this.. i thought it would work
<1> maybe i didnt configure it properly.
<1> hmm
<2> However, if you setup /etc/network/if-up.d/interacename, you can put typical bash commands there
<0> see jblack, i do try to help people.
<2> Linix: ok
<0> it's just i get annoyed when they won't listen ;)
<2> yeah, this one is annoying. :)
<2> When that happens, just help someone else, read /., write some code....
<0> sorry, damn french fries
<2> perhaps even go to bed
<1> i was looking for a better way than manually adding routing tables
<0> jblack: haha, i actually was recently reading /.
<1> i've been looking at google for a solution
<2> nexea: Do it for troubleshooting problems.
<1> proxyarp is supposed to work for me
<1> yeah.. i am reading that
<0> Nexea: http://google.com/search?q=learn+c+programming
<2> The purpose to doing it by hand right now is to see if that's the problem.
<1> why did you send me that link linix
<0> uhm
<1> the heck does it have to do with this problem
<0> <1> i was looking for a better way than manually adding routing tables
<0> that's why
<1> kind of vague
<1> well im going to try some things.. thanks for your help
<0> awesome.
<0> that's the kind of attitude i love to hear!
<0> why do i have a feeling he didn't listen to a single word we said
<0> sup syncx
<4> fine
<2> because he didn't.
<0> i doubt he man'd route
<0> +even*
<2> I'd rather you not rtfm people.
<0> i didn't
<0> he said he wanted to learn a better way than manually doing it
<2> Yeah, you did. Thats what "man route" is exactly.
<0> i gave him a link to google to learn c programming
<2> Just without the **** part.
<0> no, i tried twice to give him full examples
<0> read up.
<2> You did.
<0> then i gave up, being i'm not sure, and said to man route for proper syntax, as i wasn't sure.
<2> You did a lot of things just fine. I'm not going to stay up extra late enumerating those for you.
<5> grr
<5> anyway
<5> i do the best i can
<5> hey Mephux
<6> sup
<6> whats good tongiht
<5> pudding, friends and Linux
<5> hrm
<5> mountain dew too
<5> mountain dew is also good tonight..
<5> mountain dew is always good!
<7> Steve Irwin is dead.
<7> :(
<5> so is Elvis, what's your point?
<7> Elvis didn't die within the last few hours.
<5> ooh.
<5> how do you know?
<7> Well...
<5> who is steve irwin anyway
<7> :O
<6> hhmmm can;t figure out how to change the text color on this.... how annyoing..lol
<7> THE CROCODILE HUNTER!
<5> who?
<7> >___________<
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
dazzal this year
#worldchat
#egghelp
#india
#php
#vb
#india
#chat-world
#chat-world
#india
|
|