| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Comments:
<0> yeah
<0> that's been going round a bit over the past few months
<1> hmm ya
<0> or, was it just the single IP in there?
<1> single
<0> ahh, it may just be some kidding trying to get in then
<1> Feb 3 09:55:03 sajith sshd[7363]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for 182-14-251-64.serverpronto.com failed - POSSIBLE BREAKIN ATTEMPT!
<0> those m*** brute focers, whoever/whatever they are (I havn't read much) seem to try more than once to log in
<1> this too
<0> had it happen to a few of the servers I admin, and a home box
<1> lol first one was for more than 30 min
<1> from same ipp
<1> they running postfix on their server... i logged in and send a mail to root
<1> ::Dd
<0> whois 'em and report their ip
<1> ahhhhh.... damn its alot
<1> i just noticed todays
<2> howto check file size?
<1> du
<0> jahanshah: ls -s or du
<3> hi all
<1> now it is 219.234.142.8
<1> damn
<3> I need help
<3> anyway I can recover my filesystem table ?
<0> execve: whois'd the ip?
<1> yaa
<3> I booted my pc using PXE, diskless
<1> CN or some place
<3> mounting nfs root
<3> for some reason it overwrote my hdd with vim history
<1> some proxy msotly
<3> the first 50k or so
<0> ahh yah
<3> any ideas ?
<0> sigmoid: ran fsck?
<3> linucks, yes
<3> superblock not found
<0> sigmoid: eek..
<3> overwriten or something, must have been in the first 50k that was overwrite
<0> sigmoid: what type of partition is it? which format even.. ?
<3> ext3
<0> okay
<3> the whole harddrive
<3> lost the partition table
<0> I'll see if I can find you a nice tutorial or something along those lines heh
<0> eek
<2> 219.234.142.8 Gothenburg, VG, SE
<0> teh svenska
<0> !
<4> have a cigar
<0> cigars, heh.
<1> lists.debian.org is down
<1> ?
<0> ;x
<0> heh, has anyone tried open suse 10.1 beta 2?
<5> wow
<5> linucks
<5> any MAJOR changes?
<3> :-/
<3> I'm loosing hope of recovering my files
<3> :-/
<6> Tossa`fight = on-join
<6> wow
<7> a
<8> morning
<7> s
<6> fire-eyes, Tossa`fight is doing it too
<6> some kind of "mirc inviter" script
<9> yeah i'm getting really sick of this crap
<6> I usually run +R
<9> we had a plan to go +R on feb 1 but I don't know what happened to it. though that was in reaction to floods
<6> yeah.. I was hoping for that
<6> but umode +R means only regged nicks can message you
<9> unfortunately on dalnet +R or +M is a significant problem if services go down
<9> yeah, it's handy. though as an op here I want to get them so I can kick their wanker ***es out heh
<6> that's why you have a bot :) If services goes offline, remove the modes till it comes back
<10> no.... umode +R means that only reg's can msg you. chanmode +R means only regs can /join. +M means only regs can post to the channel.
<10> Morning, all. :)
<6> "but umode +R means only regged nicks can message you"
<6> hehe
<10> oh.heh.
<10> It's first thing in the morning. Cut me some slack!
<6> <- ex oper
<10> heh. Me, too... just not here.
<10> (thankfully)
<6> don't feel bad.. I just spent 30 minutes debugging what turned out to be a layer 1 issue
<10> bad nic? bad switch? :)
<0> simmy: how's things man?
<6> dog got behind the rack and managed to knock the wan cable loose
<10> *laughs*
<10> even better!
<10> linucks : Um... great.
<0> neato :>
<6> I replaced my old ipcop box with a cisco router last night
<6> internet is noticably faster
<10> ipcop (and most out-of-the-box OS/Firewall combos) are notorious for not having an optimized ip stack and kernel.
<10> Takes a while to tweak everything to make it fast.
<11> what's ipcop?
<11> is it what you said 2 lines ago simmy ?
<10> <6> I replaced my old ipcop box with a cisco router last night
<10> <6> internet is noticably faster
<10> <then what I said>
<10> ipcop is a linux distro made to be a turn-key solution for routing/firewalling.
<10> kinda like smoothwall, astaro, and others.
<11> oh, a distro
<12> simmy: you use software firewall yourself?
<13> raster: These days, doesn't everyone?
<13> Even windows has a firewall
<10> I do... I use OpenBSD at home. It protects all sorts of different stuff on my internal network... None of which is OpenBSD. :)
<10> I'm a STRONG proponent of running a firewall that's different from everything else on your network. Makes it harder to break into servers if you can't just use the same sploit on multiple boxes.
<10> that won't help. :)
<13> I don't believe u.
<10> You really should just ask instead of versioning someone. :)
<10> BitchX-1.1-final+ by panasync - FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE
<13> A turtle shell doesnt get harder just because it has differnt proteins
<10> OpenBSD host.domain.com 3.4 SIMKERNEL#0 i386
<13> If thay can break ur shell, then thay can break the internal squishy parts too
<10> sclemmons : But if you have a windows firewall and windows servers, you can probably get in easier than if you have a windows firwall and *nix servers.
<10> My point is.... if you harden boxes AND you harden the security of the perimeter AND it's a heterogeneous environment, you can't use the same exploits to get into data as you would to get into the network.
<10> raster^ : Yes. I run BX cloaked so it doesn't reply to most CTCP requests.
<14> hello
<0> *sigh* ahh.. what the hell would I be doing at 3:27am with out pink floyd, coffee and cigarettes?
<14> simmy: ready for the super bowl?
<10> sleeping?
<10> Isaac-Lew : nope...
<10> I still have to go buy my alcohol for the party I'm going to.
<13> I bet thay get more tools off the same thing that gave them the way to hack ur firewall
<10> Tradition is... you buy stuff for yourself and bring a 6 pack to share.
<0> simmy: very true, unfortunatly my mind doesn't think in rational directions.
<10> sclemmons : But it makes it at least a LITTLE harder.
<10> And if you have the boxes set up in a way that doesn't notify the bad guys what they are... they're left guessing and have more crap to try.
<13> Yah?
<10> Trying harder usually makes it easier to trip alarms.
<10> raster^ : it's running on an old PC. I use both AMD and Intel in my machines at home.
<13> What do u think about the extra time to manage more platforms?
<14> *sigh*
<10> If you're in a small environment, it shouldn't be a big deal. Extra time for increased security is USUALLY worth it.
<14> more platforms = more job security
<13> I bet some1 with 2 platforms doesnt do the reserch 2ice.
<0> heh, one of you two must have had some experience building 2u servers?
<13> isaac-lew: yah.
<0> (simmy, Issac-Lew)
<10> If you're in a big enough environment where it's a real issue, then you have someone to handle each platform (or at least not one do-all, anyway)
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
chat in europ
#chat-world
#allnitecafe
#kl
#allnitecafe
CAPKIN__ist
evulish
#worldchat
#india
#php
|
|