| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4
Comments:
<0> give me the original image
<1> http://kaiwitte.org/tmp/bp2.jpg
<0> ok
<0> i will resize it using my app
<0> and we will compare the results
<0> ok
<0> what's the new size that you want for the pic
<1> width of 275px, which would result in a height of 182px +/- 1
<0> true
<0> how can i upload it for you
<0> ?
<0> when i set the bound to 275
<0> the height is 182
<0> and i did put 100 for the quality
<0> it's a multi threadded app.
<0> :-)
<0> do you accept DCC?
<1> Not sure - I think so, but I have no serverport routed.
<2> how about http://folk.ntnu.no/vidarhol/lol.jpg
<0> the image size is 69k now
<2> mine is 21k
<0> i will send it by mail
<1> kwitte t kaiwitte.org
<0> ok
<1> koala_man, yours is clearly better than mine already, isn't it?
<0> wait
<2> I ran a pretty drastic sharpening filter before rescaling it, it seemed to help quite a bit with the lack of focus
<2> maybe it was a bit too much
<2> I didn't bother selectively sharpening some areas
<1> It is usually a problem to resize anything by a small magnitude like <<50 %, isn't it?
<1> In Opera btw the original image with width and height settings in the HTML code looks quite good, but all other browsers don't have such a good resize filter.
<2> so take a screen shot and compress it
<1> thx ruds, I got it. Will upload it now so that we can compare it.
<1> http://kaiwitte.org/tmp/ruds.jpeg
<0> acidjnk: check your mail
<1> http://kaiwitte.org/tmp/ruds.jpeg
<1> I say this: ruds and mine both look equally (?) unsharp, and koala_man's look a bit artificially oversharped. What do you think?
<1> s
<0> is it good?
<1> I'd say it is like mine, what do you think?
<2> the women are more sensitive to the sharpening than the man, for best results you could try sharpening separately
<1> http://witte-consulting.com/images/businesspeople_are_discussing_work_and_new_projects.jpg http://folk.ntnu.no/vidarhol/lol.jpg http://kaiwitte.org/tmp/ruds.jpeg << that are the three
<1> Maybe I should try a middle-thing between koala_man and ruds. Sharpen, but not as much as koala_man, then use a good resize filter.
<1> thx koala_man & ruds
<2> here's one that's less csharpened http://folk.ntnu.no/vidarhol/lol2.jpg
<2> not sharp enough if you ask me but it does look better than nonsharp
<1> There is still another option: Don't resize.
<1> What do you think?
<1> I could also get at least two of the images in question in a higher original resolution. Would that help very much?
<2> I think it needs sharpening regardless of whether you resize it
<1> So I shouldn't spend 4 USD to get them in a higher original resolution.
<2> is this a free version that they blurred?
<1> I wonder why the original is so very large in the file size, btw.
<2> because that wuld explain a lot
<1> No, it is the smalles payed version, 1 USD.
<1> t
<1> paid
<2> I don't think the high res would help
<1> Do you find the quality problematic?
<1> btw, if I compress almost lossless after resizing will that help? Or does the duplicate jpeg compression not cost double quality?
<2> to me it looks like the image is slightly out of focus to begin with
<2> low depth resolution
<2> or sharpness
<2> whatever you call it when the aperture is big
<2> depth of field
<1> Here are all of the images, btw. Three or four of them are getting problematic when resized: http://kaiwitte.org/tmp/i/
<1> 403 ...
<1> now: http://kaiwitte.org/tmp/i/
<2> haha, corporate stock photos
<1> Yes. I wonder why the files are so big.
<2> wouldn't do to have jpeg artifacts on them
<1> thx koala_man, with your reports I was able to improve the quality further - I think.
<1> I sharped much, but not extreme, and then used a default "smart" algorithm for shrinking, both with a very old paintshop version.
<1> I was careful for now; I think with a little more sharpening the quality would improve further.
<1> current: http://witte-consulting.com/images/businesspeople_are_discussing_work_and_new_projects.jpg and older tries: http://folk.ntnu.no/vidarhol/lol2.jpg http://kaiwitte.org/tmp/ruds.jpeg http://folk.ntnu.no/vidarhol/lol.jpg (<- the sharpest)
<3> ello dudes :)
<4> Guys, I need your help understanding a problem that I am running into with redirections
<4> I have a JSP1 Hosted on Tomcat1 and Java Code on Tomcat 2
<4> JSP1 makes calls to the Java APIs on Tomcat2, but inorder to access the servlet on Tomcat2 the authentication needs to happen
<4> So, my code works fine when I comment out the <security-constraint><web-resource><url-pattern>Servlet url pattern</url-pattern></web-resource><security-constraint> in login-filter-config.xml
<4> So, essentially avoiding the authentication step
<4> But I want the authentication to be there, so I uncomment the above in login-filter-config.xml
<4> and my JSP1 is not able to handle the redirection to the login page
<4> I am using HttpURLConnection in JSP1 and also use the setFollowRedirects(true) method to follow the redirects
<4> But no use
<4> any help
<3> be never too late!
<5> ompong: please dont pm me
<6> hi there
<6> im dealing with ibm websphere
<7> LOL!
<6> anyone experienced on it?
<2> haha
<7> koala_man is certified
<6> oh really
<2> to party!
<6> ?
<6> jajajajaajajaj
<6> jjaja
<6> im serious bro...
<6> pls
<6> i really
<2> dibblego used to work for ibm, he's uber at these things
<6> need help on it
<7> what version?
<7> I barely remember IBM junk
<6> ok...im using ibm websohere broker
<6> and that stuff
<6> tu configure a message broker
<7> is that the EJB client thing in the JVM?
<7> I feel sick
<6> jejeje
<6> nop....
<6> im only dealing with the message broker
<6> im bnot sure about some settings
<7> sorry, I have no idea
<6> do you know a channel where i can find some help?
<7> IBM support
<7> and be prepared to wait
<7> or, talk whoever-makes-the-foolish-decisions into not using IBM while you can
<7> they are your two options
<7> believe me
<6> why pal....i think ibm its better than microsoft
<6> or im i wrong?
<7> it's not a matter of right or wrong
<7> they both pretend to solve problems
<7> when they don't - to an incredible extreme
<2> I don't mind cholera, it's so much better than ebola
<7> you will sit there on this problem for weeks - thinking it is you who has the problem
<7> and IBM market it and train its followers this way
<6> well i'll give you that....u r so right pal....
<6> i mean
<6> problema after problem
<7> I can only speak for Microsoft from the outside - but it's blatantly obvious that they employ similar tactics (though, not as good at it as IBM)
<6> it never stops
<7> you say "it never stops"
<7> but don't say it and question it
<7> I ***ure you, it does not stop
<7> there are mechanisms in place to ensure it
<7> I have *seen* them
<7> I used MS Windows the other day
<3> ello koala dude
<3> and dobblego
<7> explorer *still* hangs
<2> hey
<7> hello Zenethian
<7> er, ZeroVista
<3> :)
<6> yo wre using ms and...???
<7> and windows explorer still hangs
<7> I used to work on IBM WebSphere 6
Return to
#java
or
Go to some related
logs:
What does o-level mean
WPNT511 on ubuntu
kl cam
#linux
Barbiy
hindustani larki
t
amsn debian hung
#allnitecafe
black sxsy girls
|
|
